Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201811 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

Coolidge, AZ

#167754 Nov 12, 2012
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>You didn't mention anything about the quality of the legislation to be stalled by te Rep.s in congress, you just said stall anything Obama does. it would seem you don't care about solving any problems we have as a nation. You just want your party to regain power. Sad, very sad. not a very good US citizen.
It's not my party. I'm not a Republican as I ahve said here more times than I can count.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#167755 Nov 12, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
No Clinton was acquitted ( look up that word please ), the impeachment did not fulfill a single thing that it was voted on for, not one, an absolute and total failure in every respect.
Name one outcome that the impeachment caused?
I can already tell you, none.
The real question is what were they doing in congress spending my hard earned money doing absolutely nothing of value whatsoever?
Bill Clinton was impeached (look up that word please).

On December 19,1998 Clinton was impeached by the House on two counts. Perjury and obstruction of justice. If he wasn't impeached, it would not have gone to the Senate at all. But he WAS impeached so it went to the Senate where he was eventually acquitted and thus not removed from office. The acquittal in no way negates the impeachment. You couldn't have an acquittal without impeachment!

I repeat for the 50th time Clinton was impeached. We know you don't understand, you don't have to tell us again that you don't understand.

One consequence of his impeachment was that he was disbarred.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#167756 Nov 12, 2012
Fa-Foxy wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not my party. I'm not a Republican as I ahve said here more times than I can count.
regardless...

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#167757 Nov 12, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
I think Boehner will be reasonable. And now that Obama is in his second term and has no need to keep the far left charmed anymore, he'll be more moderate. This is encouraging.
Is hhe going to pull a 'Lucy' on president Charlie Brown again and hhold the football until the last second and then pull it away? Real leaders can make shit happen, but it takes one on each side...

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#167758 Nov 12, 2012
Fa-Foxy wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not my party. I'm not a Republican as I ahve said here more times than I can count.
You gotta tell these jackasses everything 50 or 60 times!

What dopes!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#167759 Nov 12, 2012
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Is hhe going to pull a 'Lucy' on president Charlie Brown again and hhold the football until the last second and then pull it away? Real leaders can make shit happen, but it takes one on each side...
I don't know anything about those cartoons, my grand kids watch sponge bob square pants.

Yep, real leaders make sh!t happen. One on each side. And you ain't it. You're the problem, not the solution.

Jackass!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#167760 Nov 12, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Bill Clinton was impeached (look up that word please).
On December 19,1998 Clinton was impeached by the House on two counts. Perjury and obstruction of justice. If he wasn't impeached, it would not have gone to the Senate at all. But he WAS impeached so it went to the Senate where he was eventually acquitted and thus not removed from office. The acquittal in no way negates the impeachment. You couldn't have an acquittal without impeachment!
I repeat for the 50th time Clinton was impeached. We know you don't understand, you don't have to tell us again that you don't understand.
One consequence of his impeachment was that he was disbarred.
and was acquitted on Feb 12 1999 causing the impeachment to be a total and absolute failure. You keep forgetting that part.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#167761 Nov 12, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know anything about those cartoons, my grand kids watch sponge bob square pants.
Yep, real leaders make sh!t happen. One on each side. And you ain't it. You're the problem, not the solution.
Jackass!
how am i the problem?

(you don't remember Peanuts from your childhood? can you remember anything? you keep posting incorrect stuff I already ggave you verifiable facts on...)and you talk about having to tell people things again and again...hypocrit much?

What a dope!

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

Coolidge, AZ

#167762 Nov 12, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
and was acquitted on Feb 12 1999 causing the impeachment to be a total and absolute failure. You keep forgetting that part.
It wasn't a "FAILURE". Please point out where it says in teh U.S. Constitution that if the Senate doesn't covict someone of charges brought against an impeache dofficial, that it is a "FAILURE". You can't because it doesn't say that at all.

Clinton was impeached. It's a fact atht you apparently simply don't want to acknowledge.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#167763 Nov 12, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
and was acquitted on Feb 12 1999 causing the impeachment to be a total and absolute failure. You keep forgetting that part.
Impeachments don't "fail". You keep refusing to accept that part.
Nutty Norquist

La Puente, CA

#167764 Nov 12, 2012
Billionaires wasted millions trying to buy the 2012 election.

They there were the "money laundry's" that proccessed the ill gotten monies.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#167765 Nov 12, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Impeachments don't "fail". You keep refusing to accept that part.
impeachment processes do. how did the senate impeachment process go...success or fail?

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#167766 Nov 12, 2012
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>how am i the problem?
(you don't remember Peanuts from your childhood? can you remember anything? you keep posting incorrect stuff I already ggave you verifiable facts on...)and you talk about having to tell people things again and again...hypocrit much?
What a dope!
You're the problem because you're extremely partisan, not to mention a stubborn icehole. Woops! I mentioned it.

I remember peanuts from childhood. At the ball game. Crack em drop the shells on the bleachers. I'm a little older than you sonny.

Re-post some "incorrect stuff" I posted please jackass. Re-post those "verifiable facts" you posted. We'll wait.

Stop stealing my schtick.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#167767 Nov 12, 2012
He still has not looked it up, it takes both houses of congress for an impeachment to be successful..... that did not happen.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#167768 Nov 12, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
You're the problem because you're extremely partisan, not to mention a stubborn icehole. Woops! I mentioned it.
I remember peanuts from childhood. At the ball game. Crack em drop the shells on the bleachers. I'm a little older than you sonny.
Re-post some "incorrect stuff" I posted please jackass. Re-post those "verifiable facts" you posted. We'll wait.
Stop stealing my schtick.
show one example of my partisansip. please.

how 'bout your half truths of the white house watching the whole attack in real time...false.

how 'bout your claim of requests for more security in benghazi. false, they were for Tripoli.

now it's your turn...my partisanship?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#167769 Nov 12, 2012
Fa-Foxy wrote:
<quoted text>
It wasn't a "FAILURE". Please point out where it says in teh U.S. Constitution that if the Senate doesn't covict someone of charges brought against an impeache dofficial, that it is a "FAILURE". You can't because it doesn't say that at all.
Clinton was impeached. It's a fact atht you apparently simply don't want to acknowledge.
Mike cant understand it... maybe you can

It takes both houses of congress vote to successfully impeach a president and remove him from office ... did that happen?

One house votes to impeach, the second tries the impeachment

it passed the first, and failed the second.

the impeachment was a failure.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#167770 Nov 12, 2012
Fa-Foxy wrote:
As a matter of fact, since the Republicans hold a majority in the House Of Representatives, and teh U.S. Constitution specificallly states that "ALL bills for raising revenue MUST originate in teh House, the Republicans can prevent ANY increase in taxes that teh Obamaniac wants, and stop ANYTHING THe Obamaniac wnats to do, simply by voting against his proposals, or simply not voting on them at all.
I hope that the House majority OPPOSES The Obamaniac in every way possible, as that is apparently why the Americna people elected them to teh majority in teh first place.
And besides, with the Patreus\Benghazi\CIA scandal, it appears that impeachment hearings are going to be the ONLY way for teh American people to learn teh TRUTH, so The Obamaniac should jsut quitely resign right now if he REALLY wants to avoid long drawn-out impeachment hearings and an impeachment vote, and a Senat trial, whoulc could take up to 2 years to comeplete I bet.
:)
Throw STUMBLEBUM JOE in there !
NEXT !
You con dumbs are so desperate. Sorry, this whole Benghazi thing is a non issue.
You have a black president. Get over it.
Republican Hag

La Puente, CA

#167771 Nov 12, 2012
Ann Coulter Invited was Then was Uninvited to Speak at University in New York state.(good move on there part).

Did University campus Republicans bow to social pressure, or simply see the "error" of their ignorant ways?

Since Ann Coulter is nothing but a ding dong, with no top floors working.

Her West Coast Hag-partner has yet to surface.
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

#167772 Nov 12, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
and was acquitted on Feb 12 1999 causing the impeachment to be a total and absolute failure. You keep forgetting that part.
Dude. Stop it. Clinton WAS impeached. Impeachment means charges were brought. It's like an idictment by a grand jury. Clinton WAS impeached. At trial, he was acquitted.

Impeachmnet DOES NOT MEAN remove from office. It means the House voted to indict him.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#167773 Nov 12, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You con dumbs are so desperate. Sorry, this whole Benghazi thing is a non issue.
You have a black president. Get over it.
I hate the knee jerk sentiment you just made Rose, but sometimes Rose, but I wonder if it actually is the truth.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Monterey Public Officials VIOLATING FEDERAL LAWS May 26 Un agenda 21 and ... 4
public officials violating federal laws May 24 Un agenda 21 and ... 3
the music thread (Apr '12) May 23 Musikologist 19
News Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) May 23 ikestubbs 1,535
News Letters: Charter application superior (Jan '11) May 21 Yin Simons 13
News Taking extraordinary measures to wear an extrao... May 18 outtogether 2
News Police: Armed robbery at Santa Cruz sandwich sh... May 11 bump 1
More from around the web

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]