Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Laquesha Jefferson PhD]

R Hudson wrote:

I should have expected that, anyway, right ?

Hey Studly, have you and Mike DiDouchie hooked up in person or are you still in the masturbation phase of your bromance?

It would be quite a story:"A chance meeting of two homophobes on a thread about same sex marriage ends up being a life change even for both fells"

... If you boys end up getting "gay married" you might get a cable movie deal on "Lifetime" if your really lucky, "Ovation".

[Rose_NoHo]

Fabulous Frank wrote:

I just had a queer trick-or-treater ring my doorbell (he was wearing a DickOnHisHead) I slammed the door in his face.

You homophobes can't seem go two posts without mentioning dicks...

[Normal tricks]

This is normal dirty tricks politics for West Covina, California.

Assuming the Republican magots from West Covina are behind all the phony pumped up charges against Roger H.

A lightning rod since he was a member of the West Covina City Council, Hernandez this past weekend after a woman filed a restraining order against him.

This woman could have been a plant all along to bring down Roger H..

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
In the interest of expediency, instead of having him list EVERY one, why don't you list JUST ONE that DID advocate SSM ? It'll take less time

Because, stupid, Brian G made the claim that "no moral thinker in history ever advocated same-sex marriage.". It's up to him to back his up his claim. Duh.

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
You aren't even worth responding to.
1 You refuse to answer direct questions with anything other than deceit and spin.

Total BS.

R Hudson wrote:

2 You pick and choose only when you feel that you can win, citing false reports and bogus surveys that have no basis in reality.

Really? Post a link to a false report and bogus survey I sited. Or STFU after apologizing to me.

R Hudson wrote:

3 You apply a double standard to the posters this room.

Example?

R Hudson wrote:

4 You are on welfare, thus presenting yourself as the lowest form of dirt in here.

LOL! A total lie. I get you are a racist, and assume I'm on welfare because I'm black. But I have an advanced degree and I'm fully employed.

R Hudson wrote:

5 You say "FK everything we hold sacred".

Yep. Just because you hold it sacred doesn't mean I do.

R Hudson wrote:

6 You lack original thoughts, plagiarizing the works of others, in an inane attempt to sound educated.

Provide an example...
Looks like you are going to have to be doing a whole lot of apologizing to me.

R Hudson wrote:

7 You are elevated and exalted by having us even notice that you have tried to participate in the discussion.
You are a worthless, broken, drug addicted, welfare receiving, cranky old reprobate and a malodorous presence in here,

No, I'm not your wife.

R Hudson wrote:

and I, for one would rather ignore you, than bother responding to your strung-out rantings and ravings. I would enjoy it immensely if someone in here announced that you had died a horrible death, in flames and pain. If it came to pass that I saw you on fire, I wouldn't piss on you.

Typical fundie.

I don't want you to die. That would end your suffering.

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Shutup, shytehead.

Oh, good argument.

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Fundamentally, I believe that balance must be maintained, and that a SSM lacks the balance necessary in all things.

That's romantic babble. This is a legal issue.
The Constitution grants all US citizens equal rights.

[Ronald]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
Mr. Ronald. Thank you! That means a lot to me. I love your work.(Except the racism). Tough shit that you don't like mine! Deal with it.
Michael.

Mike DiRucci.

Point of information, please. Are you addressing Ronald Los Angeles or Ronald Long Beach?

Ronald

[akpilot]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah, really.
It says "Marriage and procreation are fundamental to the very existence and survival of the race", not "Marriage and procreation are rights". And they are wrong about marriage being fundamental to the very survival of the race.

That's funny, the SCOTUS is the Loving v Virginia decision didn't have the trouble connecting the dots you are having.

Or don't you like Loving V Virginia anymore?

"Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival. Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 541 (1942)."- Loving V Virginia

Really?
" We are dealing here with legislation which involves one of the basic civil rights of man. Marriage and procreation are fundamental to the very existence and survival of the race."- Skinner V Oklahoma

[akpilot]

Tzunammi wrote:

<quoted text>
Dance puppet.

She already is.

[akpilot]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Can you prove there is no elephant in your bathtub?
<quoted text>
No, if god exists, there is evidence of his existence.
It's quite possible, in fact likely, that there are fossils that exist we haven't found.

You're an idiot Rose.

There is no proof of life on another planet in the Universe. Doesn't mean it isn't there.

[Mike DiRucci]

Laquesha Jefferson PhD wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey Studly, have you and Mike DiDouchie hooked up in person or are you still in the masturbation phase of your bromance?
It would be quite a story:"A chance meeting of two homophobes on a thread about same sex marriage ends up being a life change even for both fells"
... If you boys end up getting "gay married" you might get a cable movie deal on "Lifetime" if your really lucky, "Ovation".

http://www.wavsource.com/snds_2012-10-28_1362...

[akpilot]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Total BS.
<quoted text>
Really? Post a link to a false report and bogus survey I sited. Or STFU after apologizing to me.
<quoted text>
Example?
<quoted text>
LOL! A total lie. I get you are a racist, and assume I'm on welfare because I'm black. But I have an advanced degree and I'm fully employed.
<quoted text>
Yep. Just because you hold it sacred doesn't mean I do.
<quoted text>
Provide an example...
Looks like you are going to have to be doing a whole lot of apologizing to me.
<quoted text>
No, I'm not your wife.
<quoted text>
Typical fundie.
I don't want you to die. That would end your suffering.

Seriously Rose, this response to Hudson proved everything he said about you. You wouldn't have been better off keeping your mouth shut. But then again you aren't intelligent enough to realize that.

[akpilot]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh, good argument.

About as good as yours.

[Mike DiRucci]

Ronald wrote:

<quoted text>
Mike DiRucci.
Point of information, please. Are you addressing Ronald Los Angeles or Ronald Long Beach?
Ronald

Ronald of Long Beach.

I thought I was addressing you. I was fooled by the dastardly troll from L.A. much to my embarrassment.

Love the humor in your work. It is a rare thing here and find it a treat!

Michael

[Rose_NoHo]

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
That's funny, the SCOTUS is the Loving v Virginia decision didn't have the trouble connecting the dots you are having.
Or don't you like Loving V Virginia anymore?
"Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival. Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 541 (1942)."- Loving V Virginia

But that is nowhere to be found in Skinner v OK
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/histori...

akpilot wrote:

Really?
" We are dealing here with legislation which involves one of the basic civil rights of man. Marriage and procreation are fundamental to the very existence and survival of the race."- Skinner V Oklahoma

Again, Skinner v OK was not a case about marriage. The use of the word was incidental. It was a case from the 40's...
The case was about using forced sterilization as a means of punishment. Marriage laws were not changed at all.

Anyway, WTF is your point? You don't have to be able to procreate in order to marry.

[Rose_NoHo]

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
Seriously Rose, this response to Hudson proved everything he said about you. You wouldn't have been better off keeping your mouth shut. But then again you aren't intelligent enough to realize that.

LOL. You didn't even read my response, you just replied!
For one, Rock claimed I site false reports and bogus surveys. Tell us how my response proved I site false reports and bogus surveys.
Speaking of keeping your mouth shut, looks like you are going to have to!

[Mike DiRucci]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
But that is nowhere to be found in Skinner v OK
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/histori...
<quoted text>
Again, Skinner v OK was not a case about marriage. The use of the word was incidental. It was a case from the 40's...
The case was about using forced sterilization as a means of punishment. Marriage laws were not changed at all.
Anyway, WTF is your point? You don't have to be able to procreate in order to marry.

Skinner schminner. Why are you a racist?

[Rose_NoHo]

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
You're an idiot Rose.
There is no proof of life on another planet in the Universe. Doesn't mean it isn't there.

You are the idiot.
IF god existed, there would be evidence of his existence.
He's supposed to be all knowing, all powerful and involved in our lives.
It's quite possible there is life on another planet without our having any evidence of it.

[Ronald]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
Ronald of Long Beach.
I thought I was addressing you. I was fooled by the dastardly troll from L.A. much to my embarrassment.
Love the humor in your work. It is a rare thing here and find it a treat!
Michael

Mike DiRucci.

Thanks for your good sentiments.

Ronald.(Long Beach)