Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201878 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Fred Sanford

Corona, CA

#166558 Nov 3, 2012
Amos McCoy wrote:
<quoted text>
Your granny's p.u$$$y?? Sure, I remember her cunny. Two-bits fer' evr'y half-hour behind the general store.
Cost me an even buck...

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#166562 Nov 3, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Except it wasn't her/him/it, it was Ronald..
:C
If it was Chongo, I'd've done it already...
:D
I think it was the troll from L.A. and not the real Ronald from Long Beach. He fooled me once with a fake Ronald post too.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#166563 Nov 3, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
You didn't keep your marriage male/female, you got a divorce, hypocrite. Stay home on Tuesday.
^^^Rose knows this is untrue, she doesn't care about truth as long as she achieves her political goals.

She's a liar!

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#166566 Nov 4, 2012
Don't know about anybody else, but even for a thread about same-sex marriage, there seems to be an awful lot of bitching. Especially by those who don't agree with it.

Ho-de-ho.
Mona Lott

West New York, NJ

#166570 Nov 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
And let's face it, when one is born Euro-American, one can be said to have won Life's Lottery, as we don't come any finer than that. Not sorry that you were born second-rate. After all, you are necessary, as a comparative model. People need to look at you to see the lower classes, in their true light.
You're a flaming dumbass. An accident of birth gives one exalted status????? Is being white your only claim to fame? That's pathetic.
DorN

Altadena, CA

#166571 Nov 4, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
Keep marriage male/female; vote Tuesday.

The judge overturned ban on same sex marriage, and the Supreme Court agreed. Same sex marriage is legal.
Vote Democratic and you are you are voting for equality of marriage for two consenting adults.
TheTroll Stopper

Roanoke, VA

#166573 Nov 4, 2012
Man, it seems nobody wants to discuss the actual topic of the threads these days.
DorN

Altadena, CA

#166577 Nov 4, 2012
DorN wrote:
<quoted text>
The judge overturned ban on same sex marriage, and the Supreme Court agreed. Same sex marriage is legal.
Vote Democratic and you are you are voting for equality of marriage for two consenting adults.
Actually because same sex marriage is legal it does not really matter which political party wins the election. It will not change the fact that gays can marry gays.
Mona Lott

West New York, NJ

#166578 Nov 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
And, yes it does, if you're asking....The dark people call themselves "Afro-American", now don't they ? Is this something that I am NOT allowed to do ?
Go ahead. Call yourself Afro-American. Call yourself whatever you like.... just don't call yourself sentient.
Mona Lott

West New York, NJ

#166579 Nov 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
Hell, I'll quantify it, too.
I am 1st-generation Euro-American
Oh.... 1st generation.... did your parents come here legally, or were you their anchor baby?

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#166585 Nov 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>AND, not only am I Euro-American, I am of English descent, which places me at the top of the Caucasian food chain. Top shelf. Finest gift that God ever gave the world, Englishmen.
Yea, you aren't a bigot, are you? Go play in the sandbox.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#166590 Nov 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
Boy, you sure make a lot of noise for some scrub from NJ
He's from Kentucky! A nasty little pocket of rednecks down there. So he has a fine heritage, but then he moved to Joisey and became a gay commie.

Funny stuff! But true.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#166594 Nov 4, 2012
jaymoo wrote:
Don't know about anybody else, but even for a thread about same-sex marriage, there seems to be an awful lot of bitching. Especially by those who don't agree with it.
Ho-de-ho.
QED
DorN

Corona, CA

#166595 Nov 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
AND, not only am I Euro-American, I am of English descent, which places me at the top of the Caucasian food chain. Top shelf. Finest gift that God ever gave the world, Englishmen.
White trash, by any other name...
...is still white trash. You have self-glossed yourself an upgrade to English trash. Bad teeth, bad hygiene, a large homosexual strain in the male population.

Please return to England. You are a burden to the rest of us here in America.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#166596 Nov 4, 2012
Mark Regnerus' family structure study;

Here is the bottom line (pun intended). Out of 3000 subjects, 248 had parents in a same sex house (a fair homosexual representation out of three thousand).

By the way, that is the LARGEST study of gay households to date AND over the longest period of time.

ONLY TWO WERE ANY WHERE NEAR LONG TERM! It is not Regnerus's fault that's the best gay couples do.

The children from those gay houses rated at the bottom of the family studies. It is not Regnerus's fault they did poorly. He just reported the results.

This is the simple reality you deny.

“A JOURNEY OF A THOUSAND MILES”

Since: Aug 08

MUST BEGIN WITH A SINGLE STEP!

#166597 Nov 4, 2012
KiMare wrote:
Mark Regnerus' family structure study;
Here is the bottom line (pun intended). Out of 3000 subjects, 248 had parents in a same sex house (a fair homosexual representation out of three thousand).
Actually, your comment is a lie.......the question that was asked was "Did your mother EVER have a Same-Sex relationship?" or "Did your father EVER have a Same-Sex relationship?" Once the person answered this question.....their questionnaire was separated into a different stack. There were 255 kids who answered the question yes......and it is hardly a fair representation of the Gay and Lesbian population.......also, it didn't matter if the Same-Sex relationship was a one night stand or long term........so, again hardly a fair representation!!!

Lililth_Satans_B ore

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

#166599 Nov 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Guess you are trying to be relevant and funny ?
...Pity......Keep trying.
oh stfu little bigot boy
Mona Lott

West New York, NJ

#166600 Nov 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
AND, not only am I Euro-American, I am of English descent, which places me at the top of the Caucasian food chain. Top shelf. Finest gift that God ever gave the world, Englishmen.
You poor dear. Religious AND irrational.... how fresh.
Mona Lott

West New York, NJ

#166601 Nov 4, 2012
KiMare wrote:
Mark Regnerus' family structure study;
Here is the bottom line (pun intended). Out of 3000 subjects, 248 had parents in a same sex house (a fair homosexual representation out of three thousand).
By the way, that is the LARGEST study of gay households to date AND over the longest period of time.
ONLY TWO WERE ANY WHERE NEAR LONG TERM! It is not Regnerus's fault that's the best gay couples do.
The children from those gay houses rated at the bottom of the family studies. It is not Regnerus's fault they did poorly. He just reported the results.
This is the simple reality you deny.
Regnerus compared people raised by stable heterosexual couples, to those raised by unstable mixed-orientation couples, and then declared that “gay” parents have significantly worse child outcomes than do heterosexual parents, though his data does not support that conclusion.

For Regnerus’s comparison even to have begun to be valid, he would either have had to compare 1) stable same-sex-headed households to i) stable heterosexual-headed households, or 2) unstable heterosexual households to ii) unstable mixed-orientation-headed households.

There is no need for any further discussion as to whether Regnerus made a sociologically valid comparison; he did not. This issue alone is the beginning and the end of whether his published study is valid.

Writing in the Los Angeles Times, Dr. Nathaniel Frank said that Regnerus:“fails the most basic requirement of social science research — assessing causation by holding all other variables constant.”
Mona Lott

West New York, NJ

#166603 Nov 4, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
Boy, you sure make a lot of noise for some scrub from NJ
Yeah..... we're laughing all the way to the bank, newbie.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
where can I find heroin in monterey? (Oct '14) Mar 18 Fhhvc 97
More Mexican Gang Bangers Off to Prison (Jul '11) Mar 15 Fred 5
News Do Re Mi Music & Video goes way beyond basics (Jun '09) Mar 10 cinema1895 3
Lyft in Monterey free ride! Mar 10 Faucet 1
Looking to buy... (May '16) Mar 8 Anonymous 2
Discount Tickets - Monterey Bay Aquarium Feb '17 howefortunate 1
News Trump's North Korea red line could come back to... Feb '17 Mikey 11

Monterey Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Monterey Mortgages