Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,363

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#166203 Oct 31, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, good argument.
About as good as yours.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#166204 Oct 31, 2012
Ronald wrote:
<quoted text>
Mike DiRucci.
Point of information, please. Are you addressing Ronald Los Angeles or Ronald Long Beach?
Ronald
Ronald of Long Beach.

I thought I was addressing you. I was fooled by the dastardly troll from L.A. much to my embarrassment.

Love the humor in your work. It is a rare thing here and find it a treat!

Michael

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#166206 Oct 31, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
That's funny, the SCOTUS is the Loving v Virginia decision didn't have the trouble connecting the dots you are having.
Or don't you like Loving V Virginia anymore?
"Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival. Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 541 (1942)."- Loving V Virginia
But that is nowhere to be found in Skinner v OK
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/histori...
akpilot wrote:
Really?
" We are dealing here with legislation which involves one of the basic civil rights of man. Marriage and procreation are fundamental to the very existence and survival of the race."- Skinner V Oklahoma
Again, Skinner v OK was not a case about marriage. The use of the word was incidental. It was a case from the 40's...
The case was about using forced sterilization as a means of punishment. Marriage laws were not changed at all.

Anyway, WTF is your point? You don't have to be able to procreate in order to marry.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#166207 Oct 31, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Seriously Rose, this response to Hudson proved everything he said about you. You wouldn't have been better off keeping your mouth shut. But then again you aren't intelligent enough to realize that.
LOL. You didn't even read my response, you just replied!
For one, Rock claimed I site false reports and bogus surveys. Tell us how my response proved I site false reports and bogus surveys.
Speaking of keeping your mouth shut, looks like you are going to have to!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#166208 Oct 31, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
But that is nowhere to be found in Skinner v OK
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/histori...
<quoted text>
Again, Skinner v OK was not a case about marriage. The use of the word was incidental. It was a case from the 40's...
The case was about using forced sterilization as a means of punishment. Marriage laws were not changed at all.
Anyway, WTF is your point? You don't have to be able to procreate in order to marry.
Skinner schminner. Why are you a racist?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#166209 Oct 31, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You're an idiot Rose.
There is no proof of life on another planet in the Universe. Doesn't mean it isn't there.
You are the idiot.
IF god existed, there would be evidence of his existence.
He's supposed to be all knowing, all powerful and involved in our lives.
It's quite possible there is life on another planet without our having any evidence of it.
Ronald

Long Beach, CA

#166210 Oct 31, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Ronald of Long Beach.
I thought I was addressing you. I was fooled by the dastardly troll from L.A. much to my embarrassment.
Love the humor in your work. It is a rare thing here and find it a treat!
Michael
Mike DiRucci.

Thanks for your good sentiments.

Ronald.(Long Beach)

“SCOTUS will Rule in June for”

Since: Aug 08

MARRIAGE EQUALITY:-)

#166211 Oct 31, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text> Proposition 8 is almost identical to Minnesota's law defining marriage as one man and one woman.
Judge Walker ignored the precedent of Baker v Nelson and excluded evidence showing the universal nature of male/female marriage.
No, it's not because there are 18,000 legally married Same-Sex Couples and those marriages remained valid, legal and recognized even after the passage of Prop 8.

Again, Baker vs Nelson was about getting a marriage license.......Perry vs Hollinsworth(Prop 8) is about a right that Same-Sex Couples had and was ELIMINATED by a vote........and the evidence you claimed was excluded, was more like NOT presented and totally irrelevant because it was about having something and then having it removed or taken away!!!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#166212 Oct 31, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
But that is nowhere to be found in Skinner v OK
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/histori...
<quoted text>
Again, Skinner v OK was not a case about marriage. The use of the word was incidental. It was a case from the 40's...
The case was about using forced sterilization as a means of punishment. Marriage laws were not changed at all.
Anyway, WTF is your point? You don't have to be able to procreate in order to marry.
You are a f-ing idiot. There is a reason the SCOTUS referenced Skinner V Oklahoma.

I am sorry that you failed to learn critical thinking.

Yet another example as to why you are collecting that welfare check.

SQUAWK-- RACIST-- Beat ya to it, now how about you formulate an intelligent response.

Tell us how the SCOTUS was incorrect in Loving V Virginia when it referenced Oklahoma V Skinner as the source of marriage as a "right". Show us how much smarter than you are than a sitting Justice.

BTW, have you looked up stare decisis yet?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#166213 Oct 31, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL. You didn't even read my response, you just replied!
For one, Rock claimed I site false reports and bogus surveys. Tell us how my response proved I site false reports and bogus surveys.
Speaking of keeping your mouth shut, looks like you are going to have to!
Like I said Rose, you prove his point.. You are simply too stupid to know when to shut up.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#166214 Oct 31, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL. You didn't even read my response, you just replied!
For one, Rock claimed I site false reports and bogus surveys. Tell us how my response proved I site false reports and bogus surveys.
Speaking of keeping your mouth shut, looks like you are going to have to!
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
You aren't even worth responding to.
1 You refuse to answer direct questions with anything other than deceit and spin.

You Wrote:
Total BS.

You failed to answer, as usual.



R Hudson wrote:
3 You apply a double standard to the posters this room.

You Wrote:

Example?

Here is one- Calling everyone a racists without providing the same requirement of stating which race they hate that you require from someone calling you a racist.
This is also another example of what Hudson claimed in Item 1.

R Hudson wrote:
4 You are on welfare, thus presenting yourself as the lowest form of dirt in here.

You Wrote:LOL! A total lie. I get you are a racist, and assume I'm on welfare because I'm black. But I have an advanced degree and I'm fully employed.

Proving my point. No one thinks you are on welfare because you are "black" Rose, in fact we don't even know for sure that you are- we claim you are on welfare because you are too ignorant to support yourself.

No need to go further, all of your other responses simply provided further examples of what was claimed in item 1.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#166215 Oct 31, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You are the idiot.
IF god existed, there would be evidence of his existence.
He's supposed to be all knowing, all powerful and involved in our lives.
It's quite possible there is life on another planet without our having any evidence of it.
So you claim, as fact, that there is no life on any other planet in the Universe?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#166216 Oct 31, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You are the idiot.
IF god existed, there would be evidence of his existence.
He's supposed to be all knowing, all powerful and involved in our lives.
It's quite possible there is life on another planet without our having any evidence of it.
Everyone pay attention here to Rose!!

Only in the fantasy world of Rose could anyone accept this response as logical.

Let's follow the nonsense of Rose.

Rose claims, it is quite possible there is life on another planet even though there is NO EVIDENCE OF IT!!

But, she also claims, that because there is NO EVIDENCE of god, then definitely god does not exist.

The court jester never lets us down!!
Vinkville

Covina, CA

#166217 Oct 31, 2012
No peats, next time ask permission.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#166222 Nov 1, 2012
wait.. not all the Gods are all knowing and all powerful, depends on which of the billions of Gods man has made up you are talking about.
Rebecca

Los Angeles, CA

#166223 Nov 1, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
Do you work in the gay film industry as an actor, Mister Hudson? Your face looks like one I've seen in my nephew's collection of gay porn.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#166224 Nov 1, 2012
Big D wrote:
wait.. not all the Gods are all knowing and all powerful, depends on which of the billions of Gods man has made up you are talking about.
Take your god schtick to the religion threads. There are plenty of them for you religious whack jobs. This one is about same sex marriage.

Will you be spewing more anti marriage equality rhetoric again today?

Fun!
cable guy

Los Angeles, CA

#166225 Nov 1, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Take your god schtick to the religion threads. There are plenty of them for you religious whack jobs. This one is about same sex marriage.
Will you be spewing more anti marriage equality rhetoric again today?
Fun!
another day, same old phagg.^^^
Big D

Modesto, CA

#166228 Nov 1, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Take your god schtick to the religion threads. There are plenty of them for you religious whack jobs. This one is about same sex marriage.
Will you be spewing more anti marriage equality rhetoric again today?
Fun!
I dont take order from you kid

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#166230 Nov 1, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I dont take order from you kid
No one has called me "kid" in over 60 years sonny! Thanks feels kind of good.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Feb 25 END TIMES UPDATE 71,552
Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) Feb 23 Joe Balls 1,528
Beware of Monterey Audi. Feb 4 Dave 1
Multiple suspects in custody for Seaside shootings Jan '15 Anonymous 1
Peninsula high school students arrested in 'fig... (Sep '09) Jan '15 trey 108
Other border states shun Arizona's immigration law (May '10) Jan '15 colton case 9,053
Kristen Scannell Saratoga Springs NY Adds New H... Dec '14 Kristen Scannell ... 2
Monterey Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 6:15 am PST