You are a f-ing idiot. There is a reason the SCOTUS referenced Skinner V Oklahoma.<quoted text>
But that is nowhere to be found in Skinner v OK
Again, Skinner v OK was not a case about marriage. The use of the word was incidental. It was a case from the 40's...
The case was about using forced sterilization as a means of punishment. Marriage laws were not changed at all.
Anyway, WTF is your point? You don't have to be able to procreate in order to marry.
I am sorry that you failed to learn critical thinking.
Yet another example as to why you are collecting that welfare check.
SQUAWK-- RACIST-- Beat ya to it, now how about you formulate an intelligent response.
Tell us how the SCOTUS was incorrect in Loving V Virginia when it referenced Oklahoma V Skinner as the source of marriage as a "right". Show us how much smarter than you are than a sitting Justice.
BTW, have you looked up stare decisis yet?