Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201887 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Javier

Argentina

#166102 Oct 31, 2012
Madre Soltera Gana Trabajando Desde Su Casa En Sus Horas Libres $7,438 Dólares al Mes

Natalia Álvarez de Argentina,, nunca lo hizo; hasta que la curiosidad se apoderó de ella, llenó una sencilla encuesta en línea y antes de darse cuenta, descubrió el secreto para vencer la crisis y ser capaz de mantener a su familia mientras cuida sus tres hijos.

http://trabajos-en-argentina.webs.com/

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#166104 Oct 31, 2012
Winston Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
Rose, you cannot prove a negative.
Can you prove there is no elephant in your bathtub?
Winston Smith wrote:
Did the fossil record exist before the first fossils were found?b
The existence of God or gods is based upon opinion. Likewise the lack of existence is based upon opiinon.
No, if god exists, there is evidence of his existence.
It's quite possible, in fact likely, that there are fossils that exist we haven't found.

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#166105 Oct 31, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
..There IS evidence...Look around...You think all this just happened ?
<sarcasm>There can't be a natural explanation for it.</sarcasm>

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#166106 Oct 31, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
You just called him a racial slur.
"Boob" is a racial slur?
DoorMat

Monrovia, CA

#166107 Oct 31, 2012
Whats that door mat doing there anyway?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#166108 Oct 31, 2012
Finally of course we need to acknowledge that our sources are not there for our benefit, to tell us what was going on, like radio commentators at a social gathering, but that we are eavesdropping on a debate about what Greek homosexuality was and what it should be. This debate seems to have become particularly intense in the 4th century, and the vast majority of our information about it comes from three men, writing in the decades around 350 BC, and almost certainly acquaintances: Plato, Xenophon and Aeschines. It seems clear that what provoked so much debate at this time was the development of a flourishing market for handsome boys, slaves, male prostitutes and the cithara-boys, who sang to the lyre and danced at parties. It was this challenge that our authors were responding to, wondering what the difference was in the end between the love-smitten guests at a dignified symposium and the cithara-boy hired to entertain them, between a politician who had had many admirers and a common whore. Athenian homosexuality, with all its highly patterned practices, was suddenly threatened with a highly visible doppelganger, which replaced the discourse of "admirers", "beloveds" and "gracious favouring" with a world of clients, contracts, prices and tricks. Greek Love was confronted for the first time with a rather too vivid image of sheer homosexual lust.

The sex-market had one other consequence. It made it clearer that some men were rather more devoted to handsome boys than others, going well beyond the call of duty, prepared to spend large amounts of money on them and indeed to get into fights over male slaves, while remaining immune to the charms of courtesans - men like Misgolas "always surrounded by cithara-boys, devoted to this thing like one possessed", or Ariaeus "always accompanied by handsome Striplings". A new type of person was beginning to emerge - the homosexual himself.

· The Greeks and Greek Love by James Davidson is published by Weidenfeld and Nicolson on November 29
Big D

Modesto, CA

#166109 Oct 31, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you prove there is no elephant in your bathtub?
<quoted text>
No, if god exists, there is evidence of his existence.
It's quite possible, in fact likely, that there are fossils that exist we haven't found.
There is an equal amount of evidence for every one of the billions of gods that man has believed all through our history

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#166111 Oct 31, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage AND procreation, not Marriage OR procreation...The 2 go hand in hand. So mustn't have one without the other.
Didn't know you had to be married to get knocked up.
Damn, I wasted all that time and money on birth control.
R Hudson wrote:
You wish to cheapen the whole meaning of marriage and we won't let you. And that makes you very mad. Invent your own ceremony.
The ceremony isn't an issue, stupid.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#166113 Oct 31, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage AND procreation, not Marriage OR procreation...The 2 go hand in hand. So mustn't have one without the other. You wish to cheapen the whole meaning of marriage and we won't let you. And that makes you very mad. Invent your own ceremony.
You need to go back to Jr high health class

There are millions of married couples without children, there are millions of never married people with children.

The 18,000 legally married same sex couples didn’t cheapen the meaning of my heterosexual marriage, if yours was, I wonder if perhaps you should spend more time on that, then worrying about others.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#166114 Oct 31, 2012
http://townhall.com/columnists/dennisprager/2...

...
By redefining marriage to include same sex couples we are playing with sexual and societal fire. Just as the entitlement state passes on the cost of our good intentions to our children and grandchildren - unsustainable dependency and debt -- so, too, same-sex marriage will pass along the consequences of our good intentions to our children and grandchildren - gender confusion and the loss of motherhood and fatherhood as values, just to cite two obvious consequences.

It is not enough to mean well in life. One must also do well. And the two are frequently not the same thing.

There are reasons no moral thinker in history ever advocated same-sex marriage.
Brucie Bedwetter

Pulaski, TN

#166116 Oct 31, 2012
My newest and bestest slogan is "reported"!

WAAAAAH!!!!!!!!!!

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#166118 Oct 31, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Not at all kiddo... just not here to educate you, I honestly don’t care if you understand what people are saying or not, in fact it is tad more entertaining that you don’t.
Hey, Who taught everything you know starting with how to use the reply button you ingrate!

Now you're a big shot tough guy poster thanks to me. So now you're gonna be a wiseguy?

Too Funny!

You want to deny people you don't like equal rights. Not funny.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#166119 Oct 31, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You need to go back to Jr high health class
There are millions of married couples without children, there are millions of never married people with children.
The 18,000 legally married same sex couples didn’t cheapen the meaning of my heterosexual marriage, if yours was, I wonder if perhaps you should spend more time on that, then worrying about others.
No they didn't. But your marriage did!

Too Funny!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#166122 Oct 31, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
No they didn't. But your marriage did!
Too Funny!
Wrong again kiddo... have you ever been right about anything, you would think it would happen occasionally by accident, a broken clock is right twice a day.

My marriage is fine, we are closing in on 25 years and quite happy :) Homosexuals getting married didn’t hurt ours at all, I am somewhat surprised by folks that claim it did.

Their marriages must be terribly fragile

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#166124 Oct 31, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh boy, that's a real kneeslapper. Didn't I step on you one night in TJ ?
He's a real funny guy. I think it's really Winston. Judging by the lack of imagination and general dopiness.

Fun stuff!
RiccardoFire

Corona, CA

#166126 Oct 31, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
The CEREMONY is THE issue, remember ?
No, the ceremony is when DiRucci puts his pud into his dearest Hud.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#166127 Oct 31, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again kiddo... have you ever been right about anything, you would think it would happen occasionally by accident, a broken clock is right twice a day.
My marriage is fine, we are closing in on 25 years and quite happy :) Homosexuals getting married didn’t hurt ours at all, I am somewhat surprised by folks that claim it did.
Their marriages must be terribly fragile
Wha? Does anyone read this silly blather all the way through?

What does it mean? Please explain it better.

Fun!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#166132 Oct 31, 2012
Seriously R Hudson, in what way did the thousands upon thousands of legal gay marriages cheapen your marriage?

They didn’t cheapen mine, they didn’t cheapen any of my children’s marriages either.( certainly not in cost for my daughters - chuckle )

But not in any way were they less because others could marry as well.

In what way did they cheapen yours?

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#166134 Oct 31, 2012
Big D wrote:
Seriously R Hudson, in what way did the thousands upon thousands of legal gay marriages cheapen your marriage?
They didn’t cheapen mine, they didn’t cheapen any of my children’s marriages either.( certainly not in cost for my daughters - chuckle )
But not in any way were they less because others could marry as well.
In what way did they cheapen yours?
Cool story! But please explain it better.

Funny!

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#166136 Oct 31, 2012
Big D wrote:
Seriously R Hudson, in what way did the thousands upon thousands of legal gay marriages cheapen your marriage?
They didn’t cheapen mine, they didn’t cheapen any of my children’s marriages either.( certainly not in cost for my daughters - chuckle )
But not in any way were they less because others could marry as well.
In what way did they cheapen yours?
Woops! Post wasn't for me sorry I responded!

But you forgot to use the reply button you dope.

Fun!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
where can I find heroin in monterey? (Oct '14) Dec 2 FordEracing123 85
Where can I find legit black in Salinas asap!? Nov 27 Cjay22 8
News A cold case revisited: The night Dolly Evans di... Nov 21 HD vacaville 2
News Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) Nov 16 Helen Banks Curry 1,549
News Marina mayora s race: Incumbent Bruce Delgado v... Nov '16 Seattle Doug 1
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Oct '16 Agnostic 72,043
News Editorial: Yes on Measure E Oct '16 Kelly Sorenson 1

Monterey Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Monterey Mortgages