Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 20 comments on the Aug 4, 2010, www.cnn.com story titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#165979 Oct 30, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
While you are calling US violent, I wonder if you would care to comment on post #165866, by your friend LaQuesha, or the other violent friend of yours, who wants to see kids stabbed, and will cut the throats of anyone who even hassles her kid ?
Somehow, I expect not.....it would damage your argument that we are violent, now, wouldn't it ?
LOL. You are as dumb as you are ugly.
I said con dumbs are violent and amoral. Nothing either poster can write will change that.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#165980 Oct 30, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
LaQuesha,
Penal Code 422 is the code for criminal threats. It can be filed either as a felony or a misdemeanor. As a felony, it is a strike and carries up to 3 years in custody. You will need a good criminal defense attorney. I'd strongly suggest you find someone who focuses on criminal law and who routinely practices in the court where this case will be heard. And if Topix doesn't do anything, I will be contacting the authorities.
Topix might do something, if they feel their TOS have been violated.
But the authorities would just laugh at you if you tried to file charges. What laws are you claiming have been broken?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#165982 Oct 30, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
And? I didn't say "racist" in that post, now did I?
LOLSER!
You're an idiot...

You think that you can refer to everything that is "racists" and then escape because you didn't say the actually word?

Please Rose, the rest of us aren't a ignorant as you, that's why we aren't on welfare.

Seriously, are you f-ing stupid?
What to you think your ranting about slave ownership and the black vote was all about?

Here is your post again in case you forgot what you typed:
They are all worm poop now. Have been for centuries.
I don't give a fk what they intended. They surely didn't intend for black women to be able to vote.
<quoted text>
Slave owner, rapist.
Worm poop.
You really see yourself as some knowledgeable historian, don't you? You're just a pretentious little prick.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#165983 Oct 30, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL.
You are just silly.
Skinner V Oklahoma wasn't about marriage, it was about using forced sterilization as a means of punishment. The mention of marriage was incidental.
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials...
Have you ever even read the decision in Loving V Virginia?

Can you read?

"Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival. Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 541 (1942). "- Loving V Virginia

You do comprehend why the Court cited- Skinner V Oklahoma- don't you?

Right to marriage in Loving V Virginia was in directed reference to Skinner V Oklahoma as it was cited by the court.
You would know this if you had actually read the opinion which you like to ignorantly cite all the time.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#165984 Oct 30, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
This will shut you up:
Provide any evidence that god exists.
Provide any evidence that god doesn't.
Jerry

Los Angeles, CA

#165985 Oct 30, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
WE have up to 3 years to file charges against you. Count them, 3! Sorry, Mike, I wasn't trying to be elitist...
I cannot believe that Chongo has failed to come up with some spin that makes US the culprits here, like "(we) brought it upon (y)ourselves, so what's a poster to do?"
Too bad the authorities would find that kiddy porn on your computer hard-drive during their investigation.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#165986 Oct 30, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You're an idiot...
You think that you can refer to everything that is "racists" and then escape because you didn't say the actually word?
Please Rose, the rest of us aren't a ignorant as you, that's why we aren't on welfare.
There you go with another racist comment.
You are a typical racist fundie.
akpilot wrote:
Seriously, are you f-ing stupid?
What to you think your ranting about slave ownership and the black vote was all about?
LOL. You are so stupid!
I didn't rant.
We were talking about the "intent" of the founding fathers.
And I explained why I didn't give a fk about their intent.
akpidiot wrote:
Here is your post again in case you forgot what you typed:
They are all worm poop now. Have been for centuries.
I don't give a fk what they intended. They surely didn't intend for black women to be able to vote.
<quoted text>
Slave owner, rapist.
Worm poop.
You really see yourself as some knowledgeable historian, don't you? You're just a pretentious little prick.
And?
You're the one going on a rant about this.
Do you have a collection of my posts?
Do you pull it when you read them?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#165987 Oct 30, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Provide any evidence that god doesn't.
LOL.

1. If god existed, there would be evidence of his existence.
2. There is no evidence of his existence.
3. There is no god.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#165988 Oct 30, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
There you go with another racist comment.
You are a typical racist fundie.
What is racist? Again, welfare isn't race specific, and since you don't have knowledge as to my race- which could be the same as yours- even making the claim makes you foolish.
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
LOL. You are so stupid!
I didn't rant.
All you do is rant, it's the only thing you are good at.
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
We were talking about the "intent" of the founding fathers.
And I explained why I didn't give a fk about their intent.
That explains a lot. It also shows how ignorant you are of the founding.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#165989 Oct 30, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL.
1. If god existed, there would be evidence of his existence.
If God existed, he would certainly have the power to ensure his presence was never exposed.
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
2. There is no evidence of his existence.
There is no evidence he doesn't.
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
3. There is no god.
You can't prove that statement.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#165990 Oct 30, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you ever even read the decision in Loving V Virginia?
Can you read?
"Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival. Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 541 (1942). "- Loving V Virginia
You do comprehend why the Court cited- Skinner V Oklahoma- don't you?
Right to marriage in Loving V Virginia was in directed reference to Skinner V Oklahoma as it was cited by the court.
You would know this if you had actually read the opinion which you like to ignorantly cite all the time.
Dummy, nothing you can post will change the fact that Skinner v. Oklahoma was not about marriage. It was about using forced sterilization as a type of punishment.
Here is the full quote from Skinner v OK
"We are dealing here with legislation which involves one of the basic civil rights of man. Marriage and procreation are fundamental to the very existence and survival of the race. The power to sterilize, if exercised, may have subtle, far-reaching and devastating effects." The use of the word "marriage" is incidental.(Remember, this was 1942...)
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/histori...

So, exactly what point are you trying to make?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#165991 Oct 30, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Dummy, nothing you can post will change the fact that Skinner v. Oklahoma was not about marriage. It was about using forced sterilization as a type of punishment.
Here is the full quote from Skinner v OK
"We are dealing here with legislation which involves one of the basic civil rights of man. Marriage and procreation are fundamental to the very existence and survival of the race. The power to sterilize, if exercised, may have subtle, far-reaching and devastating effects." The use of the word "marriage" is incidental.(Remember, this was 1942...)
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/histori...
So, exactly what point are you trying to make?
You certainly are dense, we should have dropped you off the NJ coast as a break wall, hurricane Sandy would have turned around.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#165992 Oct 30, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
What is racist? Again, welfare isn't race specific,
Non issue, stupid.
I keep having to explain this to you.
Racist comments are most often based on *stereotypes*.
akpilot wrote:
and since you don't have knowledge as to my race- which could be the same as yours- even making the claim makes you foolish.
You race doesn't matter. People can be self-hating. And I would not blame you in the least for hating yourself.
akpilot wrote:
All you do is rant, it's the only thing you are good at.
<quoted text>
That explains a lot. It also shows how ignorant you are of the founding.
The founding what?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#165993 Oct 30, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You certainly are dense, we should have dropped you off the NJ coast as a break wall, hurricane Sandy would have turned around.
IOW, I provided evidence, including a quote from and a link to Skinner. You can't counter my argument, so you make a lame joke.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#165994 Oct 30, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Dummy, nothing you can post will change the fact that Skinner v. Oklahoma was not about marriage.
And silly puppet, nothing you say can ever change the fact that Skinner v Oklahoma is the source of marriage as a "right" and as such is always referenced in each and every subsequent case regarding marriage right's. Including your beloved Loving V Virginia.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#165995 Oct 30, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
If God existed, he would certainly have the power to ensure his presence was never exposed.
When I say, "God" I'm talking about the Christian/fundie god, who is supposed to take an active part in our lives, answer prayers, that kind of thing. If "god" can mean anything, then, stupid, there is nothing to debate.
akpilot wrote:
There is no evidence he doesn't.
Again, dummy, the fact there is no evidence he exists is evidence he doesn't exist.
akpilot wrote:
You can't prove that statement.
I did.
But I used logic.
No wonder you didn't understand.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#165996 Oct 30, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
And silly puppet, nothing you say can ever change the fact that Skinner v Oklahoma is the source of marriage as a "right" and as such is always referenced in each and every subsequent case regarding marriage right's. Including your beloved Loving V Virginia.
Odd, Skinner v OK never says marriage is right.
Anyway, WTF is your point?

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/histori...

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#165997 Oct 30, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Non issue, stupid.
So now it's a non-issue?
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
I keep having to explain this to you.
Racist comments are most often based on *stereotypes*.
Where is the stereotype? I am guessing that you are so defensive over this because you know I am right.

Enjoy that welfare check Rose, I worked hard for it.
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
You race doesn't matter. People can be self-hating. And I would not blame you in the least for hating yourself.
"You race"? Like I said Rose, you are ignorant, and you continue to prove my point.
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
The founding what?
Is this really a question? Sorry puppet, topix doesn't have a crayon font.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#165998 Oct 30, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
IOW, I provided evidence, including a quote from and a link to Skinner. You can't counter my argument, so you make a lame joke.
What evidence? The fact that Skinner V Oklahoma is the source of marriage as a "right" and as such is referenced in every case where this claim of "right" to marriage is mentioned?

The lame joke is you Rose.

stare decisis- look it up Rose.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#165999 Oct 30, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Odd, Skinner v OK never says marriage is right.
Anyway, WTF is your point?
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/histori...
Really?

" We are dealing here with legislation which involves one of the basic civil rights of man. Marriage and procreation are fundamental to the very existence and survival of the race."- Skinner V Oklahoma

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Apr 19 rabbee yehoshooah... 71,942
where can I find heroin in monterey? (Oct '14) Apr 18 BrocSD 8
News Four suspects still at large in Monterey Penins... Apr 15 M JC 29 1
News Jewish-Christian charity helps Ukrainians move ... Apr 3 Azat 1
News Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) Apr 2 svorpion 1,531
News Homicide suspect Victor Cabrera has long histor... (Oct '08) Mar '15 mando 12
News Carmel waste broker accused of bribery (Dec '08) Mar '15 Gary 16
More from around the web

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]