I didn't decide that Appealing to tradition and using non sequiturs are logical fallacies.<quoted text>
You don't decide what the rules are. Just so' you know.
How so? Look at Loving v VAAnd protection isn't the same as extra rights, just so's you know that, too.
And it isn't a separate issue, it is part of the whole issue, as is gay indoc in schools.
Look, gay couples can and do raise kids now without marriage. You don't have to be married in order to adopt. You don't have to be married to raise a kid from a previous relationship. And you can marry and not raise kids. Separate issues. Duh.
And the "indoc" stuff is pure BS.
All laws are made up.Your irrational spouting of your made up law does nothing to deter our guardianship of our children.
And like other such laws, it's a codification of observations.
Gay marriage won't effect the guardianship of your rug rats.
No, I said a *rational* reason. Not irrelevant crap.You'll be waiting forever, as you have already been given some, and are choosing to ignore them.
You don't have to be able to procreate in order to marry. It's a non issue! Do you have a problem with sterile people getting married? You can raise children without marriage. Again, give us a rational reason Adam and Steve should not be allowed to marry.