So... it's your OPINION that your long winded rant warranted repetition. I disagree.<quoted text>
Link to what?
Since the self proclaimed PhD acted like a 5 year old and deleted the post it was responding to I have no idea what it is talking about.
Let me know when you are ready to have an adult conversation, or are you simply a Rose clone?
And your post was just another repeat of the same same old tired OPINIONS you have been hawking. No more valid this time that there were the other times you bought them up.
1.You are a (brilliant) constitutional scholar and anyone who disagrees with your bullying is a moron.
2..."Loving V Virginia
Homosexuality isn't a "race" yak yak yak....
As for an "adult conversation". That can't happen as long as you continue to be a smarmy name calling asshole.
Bader Ginsburg is 79 years old, Kennedy and Scalia are both 77. So here's hoping that Obama will get to choose the next two (or three) new justices. Assuring that the Constitution will once again be interpreted as a fluid document by a MAJORITY of the court. nations values. After all, THAT is what the founding fathers intended.