Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Lililth_Satans_B ore]

Martina Navratilover wrote:

<quoted text>The sad thing is, it is not just a name, it is free advertising for her. Literally.

aaaaaaawwwh do you dislike me????? well go take a seat with all the other jealous biatches... and when I give a fluck... I'll call your number...

[Mike DiRucci]

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>But the real issue with you is that you offer nothing to the conversation. But I guess you are free to make yourself look like the fool.

Dear, you're talking to the wrong "Mike" again....

Jeesh!

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
But gays ARE protected. The argument here is to include them in a ceremonial rite that bestows a special definition to a couple.

No, stupid it's not. People can perform whatever kind of rights they like. The REAL issue is the civil right to marriage.

R Hudson wrote:

To grant them rights is a given, to grant them a legitimate status as a couple is another thing. To confer upon them the same rights extended to a natural couple is what is at stake here. And that means that they are asking for something special.

Can't have it both ways, since straight people would also be able to marry someone of the same sex, they aren't asking for anything special.

R Hudson wrote:

They are also demonstrating in parades,

Why are you homophobes so fixated on the parades? Just quit searching youtube for clips them. You nutcases act like you can't go down to the corner store without running into a gay pride parade.

akpilot wrote:

as a superior class. We do not have a Heterosexual Parade in every city,

Gee...I wonder why...

akpilot wrote:

complete with indecent symbology, and we are also asked to accept that they wish to introduce the subject matter of homosexual couples into our school system, at an alarmingly early stage in childrens lives,

Rose's Law...
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"

akpilot wrote:

so as to prevent any natural development of the child feelings and emotions towards the gays. This is a far cry from mere protection, and goes too far. It has also been proposed to make it illegal for parents to attempt to guide a childs choices of sexual preference,

See what I mean about Rose's Law? Children don't choose their sexual preferences. What could someone have told you that would have made you "choose to be gay"? Time to put up, or shut up!
I don't anything short of hooking my privates up to a car battery and shocking me every time I had a sexual thought about a boy could have made me a lesbian. And it would have more likely resulted in a spent battery.

R Hudson wrote:

complete with the threat of the state taking custody of any children found to be guided by their parents in the choice of same.

Again, Rose's Law.
What you just claimed is pure BS. You just use "children" to whip up emotions. You try to make it seem like a person is "anti-child" if they aren't against equal rights.

R Hudson wrote:

It is not a natural thing to engage in same-sex relationships, no matter how it is dressed up and packaged.

There are same sex relationships in nature, sort of the definition of natural...

R Hudson wrote:

What IS natural is sexual relations for procreational purposes, anything else is deviance from the norm.

Tell that to all the straight couples that can't or don't want to procreate. And then find me a straight guy who will turn down a BJ from a woman saying, "Get away from me you amoral strumpet! This is not for procreational purposes! This deviates from the norm!"

R Hudson wrote:

Clearly, with scientific evidence to explain the purposes of genitalia, it is ludicrous to think of deviance as normal.

And then he adds, "Are you not aware of the fact that scientific evidence to explain the purposes of genitalia? It is ludicrous to think of this deviance as normal!"
Oh, and then, "I shall not touch your breasts, as doing so is not required for fertilization!"

R Hudson wrote:

If you want to be gay, fine. Don't ask to be included in a traditional ceremony meant to celebrate a family unit.

Pssst...stupid...they can do that now. Anybody can...

R Hudson wrote:

Do what you want, by all means. But do not ask us to smile and tell you that it is ok, it is not.

I think people are just asking you to fk off.

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
And when it comes to you, that is definitely your shoe size ...
and we are not "claiming" anything, we are stating it,

Then you are lying.
It's a fact, most people into anal sex are straight.
What percent of the population is gay?

R Hudson wrote:

you made that up. You hate everyone that is not gay, you have said so in previous post,

That's another clear lie. Post a link, b1tch, or STFU and go sit in the corner in shame.

R Hudson wrote:

Anything counts that we say counts, child. You're not the boss. You must think that you are starring in a crummy Chinese movie.

WTF?

[Mike DiRucci]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
You do realize that using other peoples names makes you a punk and a coward with no credibility don't you?
A punk troll tries to make some serious (but dopey) point about God. Funny stuff!

BTW: I do fully expect you to take this up with "Martina Navratilover"....

Or will you just continue on as the two-faced douche you've proved yourself to be over the years?

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Where do you get these stupid insults from ? Is there a "Lame-Brain" website that you go to for inspiration ? You're so 2nd grade...If I was dumb and ugly,

So, that's not your picture?

R Hudson wrote:

I wouldn't be able to dissect you at will, and I wouldn't put my picture up here.

Hey, wait, is that your picture or not? You claimed you're not ugly...the man in that pic is flat out hideous!

..

[Tata]

Lililth_Satans_Wh_ore wrote:

<quoted text>.... wow i like your ignorance... typical of a trailer hillbilly in your holler..... oh and btw i was a stripper and hooker virtually all of my life until just very recent.... now go fluck your sisterwife and claim to follow jesASS

I remember you, Lily-ho.
You used to do donkey films and turn tricks in McDonald restrooms.

[Mike DiRucci]

Tata wrote:

<quoted text>I remember you, Lily-ho.
You used to do donkey films and turn tricks in McDonald restrooms.

At least she was the producer: You were the "star".

[Brucie the Haruspic]

Lililth_Satans_Wh_ore wrote:

<quoted text> oh and btw i was a stripper and hooker virtually all of my life

Yes, you are stereotypically proud of being human debris, but may I examine your entrails?

I too worship the sphincter. I too think that the sphincter shall elevate Civilization.

The sphincter is Progressive. I'm a pathetic waste of liberal skin. Give me a medal, Mr. Congressman!!!!

[Mona Lott]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course you term the account fiction. That is my point. How did a three thousand year old fiction story accurately depict an alien, space craft and radiation?
No one here has rationally explained it.

It doesn't matter. It's fiction. You can believe it was a chariot pulling the sun across the sky for all I care. It doesn't require an explanation. Do you ask why the dish ran away with the spoon?... or why the mouse ran up the clock?

[Mona Lott]

Brucie the Haruspic wrote:

<quoted text>
No, I have never been to Hicksville, NY. Or to Hicksville, CA. How are the braincases there?
May I foretell your sphincter?

My sphincter doesn't appreciate philistines.

[Radar]

Must have been another flight of birds.

[Mona Lott]

Martina Navratilover wrote:

<quoted text>Really, how is that? 44 states do not have sad marriages and the US Supreme Court has stated that sad marriages are not constitutional.

Is that so? What planet do you live on?

[Change you can step in]

So where did everyone go? To a Pride parade? To write their Congress-critter asking for Special Status? Are they marching in the streets so that the Fish and Wildlife Commission will grant them protection as an Endangered Species?

[two stepping]

Where is a subjective verb and your a verb yourself, TN..

Then again it wasn't us, who became traitors in the 1800's..

[WeThePeopleUSA]

Do you think that same sex marriage should be legal? Go to we-the-people-usa.com and tell us about this and many more important issues.

[Change you can step in]

two stepping wrote:

Where is a subjective verb and your a verb yourself, TN..
Then again it wasn't us, who became traitors in the 1800's..

Traitors to what? The forever overbearing "Government"?

I thought you shitferbrains appreciated anarchy. I guess it means nothing if it ain't jammed up your braincase.

[Mike DiRucci]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
BTW: I do fully expect you to take this up with "Martina Navratilover"....
Or will you just continue on as the two-faced douche you've proved yourself to be over the years?

Expect in one hand sh!t in the other see which fills up faster, troll. You mad or something punk?

Funny!

[Mike DiRucci]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
Expect in one hand sh!t in the other see which fills up faster, troll. You mad or something punk?
Funny!

Nope, stupid.

Just pointing you out for the tool you are.

Carry on!

[KiMare]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL! How can you believe what you are saying!?
Holding up your hand to protect yourself from radiation!?
Turning your back? Radiation knows the difference between your front and back?
A veil? Radiation proof cotton?
Find a verse where sub atomic particles are mentioned, then you'll have something.

Actually, the modern translation of ancient Hebrew does say sub atomic particles instead of 'hand'. They just didn't know how to interpret it until now.

Smirk.