But gays ARE protected. The argument here is to include them in a ceremonial rite that bestows a special definition to a couple.
No, stupid it's not. People can perform whatever kind of rights they like. The REAL issue is the civil right to marriage.
To grant them rights is a given, to grant them a legitimate status as a couple is another thing. To confer upon them the same rights extended to a natural couple is what is at stake here. And that means that they are asking for something special.
Can't have it both ways, since straight people would also be able to marry someone of the same sex, they aren't asking for anything special.
They are also demonstrating in parades,
Why are you homophobes so fixated on the parades? Just quit searching youtube for clips them. You nutcases act like you can't go down to the corner store without running into a gay pride parade.
as a superior class. We do not have a Heterosexual Parade in every city,
Gee...I wonder why...
complete with indecent symbology, and we are also asked to accept that they wish to introduce the subject matter of homosexual couples into our school system, at an alarmingly early stage in childrens lives,
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"
so as to prevent any natural development of the child feelings and emotions towards the gays. This is a far cry from mere protection, and goes too far. It has also been proposed to make it illegal for parents to attempt to guide a childs choices of sexual preference,
See what I mean about Rose's Law? Children don't choose their sexual preferences. What could someone have told you that would have made you "choose to be gay"? Time to put up, or shut up!
I don't anything short of hooking my privates up to a car battery and shocking me every time I had a sexual thought about a boy could have made me a lesbian. And it would have more likely resulted in a spent battery.
complete with the threat of the state taking custody of any children found to be guided by their parents in the choice of same.
Again, Rose's Law.
What you just claimed is pure BS. You just use "children" to whip up emotions. You try to make it seem like a person is "anti-child" if they aren't against equal rights.
It is not a natural thing to engage in same-sex relationships, no matter how it is dressed up and packaged.
There are same sex relationships in nature, sort of the definition of natural...
What IS natural is sexual relations for procreational purposes, anything else is deviance from the norm.
Tell that to all the straight couples that can't or don't want to procreate. And then find me a straight guy who will turn down a BJ from a woman saying, "Get away from me you amoral strumpet! This is not for procreational purposes! This deviates from the norm!"
Clearly, with scientific evidence to explain the purposes of genitalia, it is ludicrous to think of deviance as normal.
And then he adds, "Are you not aware of the fact that scientific evidence to explain the purposes of genitalia? It is ludicrous to think of this deviance as normal!"
Oh, and then, "I shall not touch your breasts, as doing so is not required for fertilization!"
If you want to be gay, fine. Don't ask to be included in a traditional ceremony meant to celebrate a family unit.
Pssst...stupid...they can do that now. Anybody can...
Do what you want, by all means. But do not ask us to smile and tell you that it is ok, it is not.
I think people are just asking you to fk off.