Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,192

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#164064 Oct 19, 2012
Edgar wrote:
<quoted text>
You're just what your picture depicts you to be - a loudmouth bully.
Have fun in the bubble.
Thanks!
oh henry

Los Angeles, CA

#164065 Oct 19, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
How about when that gorilla took your moms ass ?
Kong loved it.
Edgar

Spring, TX

#164067 Oct 19, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
How about when that gorilla took your moms ass ?
UH OH ROCKY'S BACK
Edgar

Spring, TX

#164070 Oct 19, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Merely a fact that many of us have jobs to go to, unlike you, who must be living in yer mammies basement, leeching off of yer parents.
Plot twist - i'm a student

OMG WUUUUUUUUUUUUT

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#164072 Oct 19, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You fell for it. Now, I will never reply to you again! LOLSER! And you'll keep posting more and more /toabout me, trying to get my attention, and response. But you won't get one.
Gotcha.
FUNNY stuff!
Loc Nol Ngyuen

Los Angeles, CA

#164073 Oct 19, 2012
Edgar wrote:
<quoted text>
UH OH ROCKY'S BACK
Easy does it, queer... don't get your blood pressure up.
Edgar

Spring, TX

#164075 Oct 19, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
We don't care what they do in the privacy of their own homes. They/you are bringing it out onto Main Street. How about you manage your own business and keep it private, instead of offering links into the sordid and decadent world to which you belong ?
1. YOU DO SO CARE BRO THAT WAS THE ENTIRE THESIS OF YOUR ARGUMENT LAST NIGHT I READ YOUR COMMENTS
2. If you're bothered by people expressing free speech, move to North Korea.
Edgar

Spring, TX

#164077 Oct 19, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
You are making that up, child. None of us have said that. I, for one, don't care what twisted shit you poofs get up to in your private harems. Stop screeching for acceptance and validation.
None of you have ever said it...RIGHT...

Ever heard of a guy named Rick Santorum?

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#164078 Oct 19, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
So you just popped out of thin air.
So the "creator" just popped of thin air.
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Poor Rose, thinks she is smarter than the SCOTUS. You should go tell them they got it wrong, I am sure they would love to hear from ya.
We don't have a creator. The SCOTUS can determine law, but not reality.
akpilot wrote:
And Rose, I cut and paste quotes and facts because unlike you I don't operate in fantasy land. That is how intelligent people debate, but as we all know you aren't intelligent. You actually think your opinions matter, it's so cute.
BTW, what the hell does (Or are the quotes and not something else) mean?
I'm making fun of your making an issue of the use of the word "quote" WRT to something John Adams said, or was it something he wrote, or something....
Were you toilet trained at gun point?
And before you ask...
http://www.acronymfinder.com/Toilet_Trained-A...
akpilot wrote:
Again your lack of education fails you, you can't even formulate a complete, rational, and coherent sentence.
LOL. If you only knew...
Edgar

Spring, TX

#164080 Oct 19, 2012
Loc Nol Ngyuen wrote:
<quoted text>
Easy does it, queer... don't get your blood pressure up.
I'm gay now? WHY DIDN'T YOU TELL ME BEFORE D:
Edgar

Spring, TX

#164082 Oct 19, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Banal oaf.
We are not debating about having anal sex.
We are debating validation.
Stay focused, you gibbon. As I have said, enjoy the crack, you are out there, where the buses don't run.
So you are willing to let them have it but aren't willing to validate (aka acknowledge) the fact that they have it...ok

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#164083 Oct 19, 2012
Edgar wrote:
<quoted text>
You just answered my nonsense, so apparently I am worth it.
Thanks for the subliminal compliment! I'm touched :D
Akpilot sure makes a lot of replies to people telling them they aren't worth replying to.
Edgar

Spring, TX

#164085 Oct 19, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
Pure Bollocks !!! Absolute Fabrication !!! I damn near posted a thesis about the effects on the subsequently adopted children !!! Is this dismissal of evidence, or simply not grasping anything that displeases you and upsets your "righteous" stance ?
My arguments have contained absolutely nothing even remotely resembling religion. Complete Balderdash from you.
Sorry for typo's, this is the intended post.
I'm going to sit back now and watch you explode. I don't have to run circles around you anymore, you're doing that to yourself. Anybody got popcorn?

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#164086 Oct 19, 2012
Edgar wrote:
<quoted text>
1. YOU DO SO CARE BRO THAT WAS THE ENTIRE THESIS OF YOUR ARGUMENT LAST NIGHT I READ YOUR COMMENTS
2. If you're bothered by people expressing free speech, move to North Korea.
You mad?

Funny Stuff!

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#164088 Oct 19, 2012
Rose Theodor wrote:
<quoted text>You really are dumb. First that is not true. The studies noted if the straight men had engage in anal sex, as in tried. That does not make mention of regularity. Studies showed that only 2% of straight men and women used anal sex as a primary sex method. Only 2% of the men engage in oral anal sex.
Compare:
91% of gay men engaged in regular anal penile sex.
99% of gay men engaged in regular anal oral sex.
In other words, not only do gay men have a life time "back stage pass", they have an oral fixation on it. Lunch.
I have a feeling you don't know what the meaning of the word "most" is. What percentage of the population is gay?

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#164089 Oct 19, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
So the "creator" just popped of thin air.
<quoted text>
We don't have a creator. The SCOTUS can determine law, but not reality.
<quoted text>
I'm making fun of your making an issue of the use of the word "quote" WRT to something John Adams said, or was it something he wrote, or something....
Were you toilet trained at gun point?
And before you ask...
http://www.acronymfinder.com/Toilet_Trained-A...
<quoted text>
LOL. If you only knew...
"LOL. If you only knew... "

Narcissist speak for "I don't have sh!t".

Funny!

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#164090 Oct 19, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
Pure Bollocks !!! Absolute Fabrication !!! I damn near posted a thesis about the effects on the subsequently adopted children !!! Is this dismissal of evidence, or simply not grasping anything that displeases you and upsets your "righteous" stance ?
My arguments have contained absolutely nothing even remotely resembling religion. Complete Balderdash from you.
Sorry for typo's, this is the intended post.
Removal and correction of your typographical errors aside, this is still a lousy example of a sensible post. I would venture to guess your 'thesis' on the effects (of gay marriage??) on "...the subsequently adopted children," would have been roundly ridiculed by any professor of sociology, psychology, or cultural studies, requiring a thesis of any description.

Dude - the predominant effects on children adopted by (or born to) a loving gay couple, are usually that they have loving parents; and all that circumstance entails. Just like any other kid raised by loving parents. And in fact, these kids have two parent families far more frequently than children born to, or adopted by, heteros do. Look at the records of any state facility for orphaned or abandoned children, to see this for yourself...

Facts matter.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#164091 Oct 19, 2012
Tata wrote:
<quoted text>
Take a closer look at your utility bills, and any other public service bill or fees (tax), these are state wide. Although these extra costs are above and beyond your actual utility usage, they off set the cost to finance meds to the Aids/HIV patients for one example, there are others however. Most company health insurance will not pay for a pre-existing illness such as and AIDS/HIV patient. The state very carefully blends these hidden costs in you monthly bills, clever huh ??? It's obvious that SSM is taking advantage of this thinking that by marring they can get double coverage. It sounds complicating because it is most people don't look at the real reasont for tax/fee increases they just pay them.
You homophobes tend to be so paranoid it's funny. Wow, you even see some "gay agenda" in our utility bills!

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#164092 Oct 19, 2012
Liam R wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps you missed my point. I was saying that the only arguments that anyone has been able to come up with are based on religion. Without using false translations of the Bible, the anti-SSM crowd looses any semblance of validity.
And of course, the religious argument fails since the rules of one person's religion have NO bearing on the behavior of people who believe differently.
Beyond that, it simply comes down to the application of the 14th amendment. ALL citizens, INCLUDING unpopular minorities, are entitled to equal protection under the law. Discrimination against a minority requires a compelling state interest, but there is no compelling state interest in denying gays their right to marry.
This would hold true even if sexual orientation were merely a matter of choice, but the current scientific evidence shows that there is a genetic or epigenetic nature to orientation. Thus, the situation is completely analogous to allowing different races to marry, which the courts have already declared a basic right.
Some people vainly attempt to claim that the lack of children (without artificial aid) inhibits the right of gays to marry, yet there is no fertility test for heterosexual couple prior to marriage, not even a question of intent to have children is required. Thus, the lack of intrinsic childbearing capability cannot be viewed as a valid argument against SSM.
There should be a "slam dunk" judge it icon.

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Mexico

#164094 Oct 19, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
There should be a "slam dunk" judge it icon.
How about a skanky trampy tranny ho judge it??

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 2 hr JOEL 70,105
Live Oak stabbing is second in two days (Jun '08) Oct 17 savvylocal 245
International CIT conference comes to Monterey Oct 14 DO Powers 1
where can I find heroin in monterey? Oct 8 thazzleb17 2
Pacific Grove Girl Chelsie Hills Law suit. Rea... Oct 3 Siding with Toyota 1
Carmel waste broker accused of bribery (Dec '08) Sep '14 Shelly 12
Suri Cruise's dog is missing in Los Angeles Sep '14 fancy 3
Monterey Dating
Find my Match

Monterey Jobs

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Monterey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Monterey

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]