Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201844 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#163984 Oct 19, 2012
Big D wrote:
Last time I looked there were some 18,000 legal gay marriages in the state of California, I donít happen to be gay, but I noticed their getting married didnít hurt my marriage in any way at all, I feel sorry for the religious folks whose marriage are so fragile that they claim it hurt theirs.
Sure you do Biggie D. You're so compassionate.

Funny!

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#163985 Oct 19, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
What a waste of beano. You ain't no picnic in the park anyway toots!
Bye. Bet you don't look like your picture.
Since your flatulence continues, I have to agree it was a waste.

You mean the hag in the habit?

:)

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#163986 Oct 19, 2012
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>Since your flatulence continues, I have to agree it was a waste.
You mean the hag in the habit?
:)
Slow morning eh toots?

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#163987 Oct 19, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Slow morning eh toots?
So far, yes. I'm here for fun - and you're not supplying it.

Get with the program.

:P
RetardO

La Puente, CA

#163988 Oct 19, 2012
Is this another sister, sister act?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#163990 Oct 19, 2012
True I donít look around to see who I can deny rights to, in an American, I value freedom.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#163991 Oct 19, 2012
Big D wrote:
True I donít look around to see who I can deny rights to, in an American, I value freedom.
Wow! cool.
FT record

La Puente, CA

#163992 Oct 19, 2012
For the record, it was President Obama who authorized the mission; it happened on his watch, so he gets credit.
Tata

Westminster, CA

#163993 Oct 19, 2012
Big D wrote:
Last time I looked there were some 18,000 legal gay marriages in the state of California, I donít happen to be gay, but I noticed their getting married didnít hurt my marriage in any way at all, I feel sorry for the religious folks whose marriage are so fragile that they claim it hurt theirs.
Take a closer look at your utility bills, and any other public service bill or fees (tax), these are state wide. Although these extra costs are above and beyond your actual utility usage, they off set the cost to finance meds to the Aids/HIV patients for one example, there are others however. Most company health insurance will not pay for a pre-existing illness such as and AIDS/HIV patient. The state very carefully blends these hidden costs in you monthly bills, clever huh ??? It's obvious that SSM is taking advantage of this thinking that by marring they can get double coverage. It sounds complicating because it is most people don't look at the real reasont for tax/fee increases they just pay them.

“TO HATE SOMEONE SIMPLY FOR WHO”

Since: Aug 08

THEY ARE IS WRONG!!!

#163995 Oct 19, 2012
Tata wrote:
<quoted text>
Take a closer look at your utility bills, and any other public service bill or fees (tax), these are state wide. Although these extra costs are above and beyond your actual utility usage, they off set the cost to finance meds to the Aids/HIV patients for one example, there are others however. Most company health insurance will not pay for a pre-existing illness such as and AIDS/HIV patient. The state very carefully blends these hidden costs in you monthly bills, clever huh ??? It's obvious that SSM is taking advantage of this thinking that by marring they can get double coverage. It sounds complicating because it is most people don't look at the real reasont for tax/fee increases they just pay them.
Yep, hidden medical costs in our utility bills.......are you paranoid? or just simply an azz Bruno?

“TO HATE SOMEONE SIMPLY FOR WHO”

Since: Aug 08

THEY ARE IS WRONG!!!

#163996 Oct 19, 2012
FT record wrote:
For the record, it was President Obama who authorized the mission; it happened on his watch, so he gets credit.
And it was the House Republicans who failed to provide funding for the extra security that was asked for.......so, yes the President is overall responsible for the mission.......but the Republicans have blood on their hands as well......Boehner has done everything in his power to make the President look as bad as he can!!!

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#163997 Oct 19, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Not once have I used religion as a point in this debate, so again:
This has nothing to do with religion, so come up with a rational argument.
Perhaps you missed my point. I was saying that the only arguments that anyone has been able to come up with are based on religion. Without using false translations of the Bible, the anti-SSM crowd looses any semblance of validity.

And of course, the religious argument fails since the rules of one person's religion have NO bearing on the behavior of people who believe differently.

Beyond that, it simply comes down to the application of the 14th amendment. ALL citizens, INCLUDING unpopular minorities, are entitled to equal protection under the law. Discrimination against a minority requires a compelling state interest, but there is no compelling state interest in denying gays their right to marry.

This would hold true even if sexual orientation were merely a matter of choice, but the current scientific evidence shows that there is a genetic or epigenetic nature to orientation. Thus, the situation is completely analogous to allowing different races to marry, which the courts have already declared a basic right.

Some people vainly attempt to claim that the lack of children (without artificial aid) inhibits the right of gays to marry, yet there is no fertility test for heterosexual couple prior to marriage, not even a question of intent to have children is required. Thus, the lack of intrinsic childbearing capability cannot be viewed as a valid argument against SSM.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#163998 Oct 19, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
What is your point? That the Federal government extended the practice of voting to women?
That in and of itself shows that it is not a "right", it is a privilege.
But if it makes us feel better to call it a "right" so be it, doesn't change reality.
No, it does NOT change voting from a right to a privilege. It merely indicates that prior to that time, women were categorically DENIED their right to vote, for no valid reason beyond the mere fact that they were of a different gender than the Founding Fathers. Hey, the Founding Fathers were good. Considering that they had to invent all of this from scratch, they were incredibly good. But they still suffered from the prejudidices of their time.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#163999 Oct 19, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
If you think I am a child, then you are delirious. How can you promote something "icky" ?
Silly child, I refer to your mental age...

As for promoting something "icky", I don't. I do not "promote" anal sex, oral sex, vaginal sex, or axillary sex (that's: "armpit"). What I DO promote, indeed I insist upon, is that consenting adults have the right to perform and and all sexual actions to which they can agree. Note that KEY phrase: "consenting adults".

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#164000 Oct 19, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope. Don't need to. Got what I need. You?
Are you comming out? Well good for you. I am sure you can and will find love, just not from me. My wife does not share her fella.
Edgar

Los Angeles, CA

#164001 Oct 19, 2012
Liam R wrote:
<quoted text>
Silly child, I refer to your mental age...
As for promoting something "icky", I don't. I do not "promote" anal sex, oral sex, vaginal sex, or axillary sex (that's: "armpit"). What I DO promote, indeed I insist upon, is that consenting adults have the right to perform and and all sexual actions to which they can agree. Note that KEY phrase: "consenting adults".
I take it then that you and yours are okay with her being filmed with burros and you fellating black men since you are both consenting adults.

Right?

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#164002 Oct 19, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
OK, wise guy, how about prostitution ?
well, what about it? It is an act between consenting adults, an agreement to exchange a service for payment.

Oh, there are certainly potential complicating factors, like the possibility of one person being breaching a promise of fidelity to an outside party. And of course, sex trafficking removes the point of consent from one party. And of course, since it involves some degree of promiscuity, even with safe sex precautions, there is a risk of disease. But even with these considerations, there are remedies within the legal framework that raise serious questions regarding the validity of the laws creating a blanket prohibition of prostitution.
Tata

Los Angeles, CA

#164003 Oct 19, 2012
NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, hidden medical costs in our utility bills.......are you paranoid? or just simply an azz Bruno?
Fkk off.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#164004 Oct 19, 2012
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Are you comming out? Well good for you. I am sure you can and will find love, just not from me. My wife does not share her fella.
Like I said, I have what I need. I'm real proud that you do too!

I certainly don't need or want your gnarly ass or your wife's either. Why would you ask?

P.S. Maybe I am gay. So what? You some kind of homophobe or something?

TOO FUNNY!
Edgar

Los Angeles, CA

#164005 Oct 19, 2012
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Are you comming out? Well good for you. I am sure you can and will find love, just not from me. My wife does not share her fella.
You're nuts. I cyber boned your missus two nites ago. She's a great on-line ho!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Jul 22 dGo mneDad lyHo i... 71,943
News Del Rey Oaks Garden Center grand opening schedu... Jul 21 Kathi Buckley Smith 1
drugs Jul 16 JayJay 2
News Sex offender Tom Pollacci pleads not guilty to ... (Mar '09) Jul 15 martin5 360
City of seaside needs to replace more than PD T... Jul 10 fed up 1
Monterey Seafood Restaurant Celebrates its 26 Y... Jul 6 cafefina58 1
News Carmel waste broker accused of bribery (Dec '08) Jun '15 ChaCha 17
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Monterey Mortgages