Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[RetardO]

iF IT'S NOT WORTH POSTING ABOUT THEN YOU'LL FIND IT HERE.

[Liam R]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
I was there in the 70's. It was a relatively obscure disease until it spread like wildfire through the gays, when it gained widespread notice.Guess what was causing its prolific spread ?# guesses and the first 2 don't count count. I think there is a bus heading to Realityville, you should buy a ticket.....

Silly child. It was a relatively obscure disease AMONG THE HETEROSEXUALS until it hit that segment of the gay community that was engaged in unprotected promiscuous sex.

And THAT is why I promote same sex marriage, the teaching of the proper use of, and the need for, barrier based contraception, and the joys of fidelity.

Why would I waste money on a bus ticket when I live in reality? I guess that you are just too unfamiliar with what reality looks like to recognize it...

[Rose_NoHo]

Liam R wrote:

<quoted text>
But then God changed Steve to Eve, so obviously the God of the Bible is just fine with transgendered folks...

LOL. So true.:)

[Liam R]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't you know that 2 men engaging in anal sex is unnatural ? Biology 101. Every part has a purpose.....

Silly child, once again... ALL species of mammals have been documented with member engaging is same sex relations. So by definitions, it IS natural. Now, if you want to say that it is icky, well then I can't really argue with you, since I am not interested in it either.

[Liam R]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Thank you, Liam, damnit, half of me likes you.....you make sense half of the time.

I make sense ALL of the time, you just don't realize it yet...
:)

[Liam R]

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
This has nothing to do with religion, so come up with a rational argument.

Ah, but the argument against SSM is based entirely on religion. And while science fiction is not a religion (even if some fans think that it is a way of life...), SF does provide various conceptual visions of possible futures, including some very positive images that we all can and should work to bring into fruition.

[RTPBS ers]

Your mean to tell me BS stands for Blood Suckers?

What about RTPBS?

Republican Tea Party Blood Suckers..

[Liam R]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
An activist judge is one who operates with a bias, or a hidden agenda. And we all know there is a gay agenda, like forcing the majority of us to accept gay marriage. If it is natural, then so must murder and rape be natural, using your own "it exist, so it must be right" logic. Why do we punish murderers and rapists ? Because society, as a whole, has deemed it to be unacceptable to commit certain acts, moron. And if we do not have the right to set standards for ourselves, then why do we have prisons at all ? Answer that, idiot. Or did I go too fast ?

FAR more to the point, rape and murder actually cause HARM. Same sex marriage does not.

Do you need help understanding the difference between "consensual" and "unconsensual" actions?

[Tata]

Frank Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
And what queer name would that be, Tata--I mean, Wilson,--I mean, Bruno...?
Besides, what's wrong with this queer name? At least it's not Mike DiRucci---That's a girls name!

I use my own names, not the names of others in this thread to post as their rivals. You are a troll

[Tata]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Really? Monkeys have straight hair, thin lips, light skin and flat butts.
I've got kinky hair, BJ lips, copper skin, and while Sir-Mix-a-lot might not find me attractive, my butt is hardly flat.
What about you?
<quoted text>
Really? Monkeys have straight hair, thin lips, light skin and flat butts.
Again, stupid, it's a simple fact that racists lie you use "monkey" as a racist slur.

If the shoe fits wear it. No one besides you and the troll Rizzo will deny that there is a huge similarity between blacks and apes, gorillas, monkeys etc. the world knows it and you brought the entire identity issue up any way so STFU

[RetardO]

Never mind it wasn't important.

[Rose_NoHo]

Tata aka boob wrote:

<quoted text>
If the shoe fits wear it. No one besides you and the troll Rizzo will deny that there is a huge similarity between blacks and apes, gorillas, monkeys etc. the world knows it and you brought the entire identity issue up any way so STFU

Boob, ALL people are apes, so to say there are similarities between black people and apes is well, pointless.
And what do black people and monkeys have in common again? The light skin? Straight hair? The thin lips? What about the flat butts?
"Monkey" is just a stupid racial slur used by morons like you.
And so is "ape", as all humans are apes. Using that term as a racial slur it like calling black people "mammals" as an insult.

So, why are fundies such racists? Didn't Jesus think enough of black people to die for us?

[Liam R]

Frisbee wrote:

<quoted text>
Two presidents managed to find a different choice for 15 years (he gassed his people in 1988), until W decided they needed a lie because Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11.
...

I can certainly agree with you that Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11, and leaving him in power would have kept Iraq as a secular nation not under the control of Islamic jihadists.

[RetardO]

Just can't hold your own today, can you?

[Jose]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Why are fundies such racists? and stupid, look at this pic...
http://www.rexwallpapers.com/wallpaper/Monkey...
Almost no lips. Straight hair, light skin, and where is the butt?
The Romans had the right idea, just too few lions.

I have to say that I "respect" them more when they stop hiding behind "Fiscal conservatism" "Obama is an illegal" and countless other BS and they just show what they are about.

The tea party made no secret what they were about when they first marched in Broward, Florida right after Obama was elected but over time the pros have taken over and polished it up.
Same people with same mind set but with polished rhetoric .

T-shirt at Romney rally says 'Put the white back in the White House'

http://now.msn.com/romney-supporter-t-shirt-s...

[akpilot]

Frisbee wrote:

<quoted text>
Says the guy who thinks the Constitution doesn't Enumerate Rights.....

So we are back on this childish nonsense now that you had your a$$ handed to you with the discussion of the 14th Amendment.

Your feeble mind has failed you again. You are trying to hard to have that "gotcha" moment so you can get that gold star.

The design of the Constitution was to enumerate certain powers and provide a framework for our government. Through this framework the freedom and right's of the people would be preserved. In not ONE section of the original body of the Constitution will you find a SINGLE "right" outlined. Though one could split hairs in a vain attempt, which I sure you would, to prove me wrong that we do have the "right" to a Republican form of government as outlined in Article IV Sec 4.

In your attempt to gain brownie points you have taken my comments out of context. The previous discussion was in regards to the central purpose of the Constitution, which clearly was to enumerate powers- anyone who has studied the journal on the Constitutional Convention knows this- and claim that I stated there are NO right's outlined in the Constitution.

Now let me give you an education, lord knows you need one.

The original text of the Constitution as presented to the States for ratification did not enumerate a single right- yes we know about Article IV sec 4 we have been over it. During the ratification debates- notably Virginia and New York- issue was taken that the new constitution did not go far enough, and the Federal Government could overstep its enumerated powers treading on the right's of the citizens, as such they demanded a "Bill of Right's" to specifically protect those right's they held most dear. Madison advised against this, stating that doing so would undermine the entire document and lead Government to believe they had those powers all the time even though they lacked the enumeration of power in those areas. Madison's concern is the precise reason why we have the 9th and 10th Amendment.

So to say the Constitution is an enumeration of "right's" as you claim is patently false. If that were the case we would have very few "right's", in fact they would take up less than a page.

No go educate yourself so we can attempt to have an intelligent conversation.

[Frank Rizzo]

Tata wrote:

<quoted text>
I use my own names, not the names of others in this thread to post as their rivals. You are a troll

[Psst....Bruno....Retarded Frank Rizzo's name isn't really Frank Rizzo....]

[Edgar]

Jose wrote:

<quoted text>
I have to say that I "respect" them more when they stop hiding behind "Fiscal conservatism" "Obama is an illegal" and countless other BS and they just show what they are about.
The tea party made no secret what they were about when they first marched in Broward, Florida right after Obama was elected but over time the pros have taken over and polished it up.
Same people with same mind set but with polished rhetoric .
T-shirt at Romney rally says 'Put the white back in the White House'
http://now.msn.com/romney-supporter-t-shirt-s...

Conservative backlash: "it was probably a liberal plant dagihi;rgihegi;h"

http://crooksandliars.com/john-amato/right-wi...

[Frank Rizzo]

Tata wrote:

<quoted text>
If the shoe fits wear it. No one besides you and the troll Rizzo will deny that there is a huge similarity between blacks and apes, gorillas, monkeys etc. the world knows it and you brought the entire identity issue up any way so STFU

Bruno...you little racist retard....There is as much similarity between blacks and gorillas as there is between irishmen and orangutans.

[akpilot]

Frisbee wrote:

<quoted text>Don't bother. These two are FAR too stupid to read the document in question. They'll cling to whack-job blogger and not bother to read something as simple as the 9th amendment:
The ENUMERATION in the CONSTITUTION, of certain RIGHTS...

Yeah, Thomas Jefferson was a real idiot:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--"

Nope, don't see him say we were " endowed by our Constitution..."