Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Frisbee]

justsayN wrote:

Says who?
The only right you are born with is the ones the Government grants you and they can taken away just as easily, stop kidding yourself.

Don't bother. These two are FAR too stupid to read the document in question. They'll cling to whack-job blogger and not bother to read something as simple as the 9th amendment:

The ENUMERATION in the CONSTITUTION, of certain RIGHTS...

[Frisbee]

Liam R wrote:

Saddam had, and USED chemical weapons in both his war with Iran and on the Kurds in his own country. Since he REFUSED to provide proof that he no longer had those weapons, he did not give us any choice but to invade.

Two presidents managed to find a different choice for 15 years (he gassed his people in 1988), until W decided they needed a lie because Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11.

R Hudson wrote:

Biology 101. Every part has a purpose.....

Explain the purpose of your nipples, Dr. Biology.

[TeaBreakEscape]

Taking the TBE TO A NEW HEIGHT IS ALWAYS A THRILL.

[Mike DiRucci]

Frisbee wrote:

<quoted text>Don't bother. Bla bla bla.

"Don't bother" Translation: He's right, but I have no argument and I don't like him. Too Funny!

You are born with your rights. The end.

[Frank Rizzo]

Tata wrote:

<quoted text>
Although there may some truth to what you say, it's also fact that blacks have maintained the physical characteristiscs of the "Ape"/ Gorilla / Chimp / Monkey, all others have advanced. Point is: if you are so proud of that fact then wear it, stop pulling the race card evry time someone acknoleges you as a "Monkey" a decendant from the "Ape"

Bruno! If you're going to make racist remarks, make an educated one.

Monkeys are not descended from apes, nor vice-versa. They share a common ancester deep in the past, but they are very distinct groups. Even within these groups, the various species are very distinct and highly evolved, although certain individuals (usually living too close to the petrochemical fields of the LA basin) seem less evolved than others.

Please see the following chart:

http://elearning.la.psu.edu/anth22/lesson_2/i...

BTW: Thank you for clarifying that not only are you a knuckle-dragging homophobe, you're a slacked-jaw racist.

Well done!

[NorCal Native]

Tim Shields wrote:

Morning doc,
You know that most of what you posted is outright lies......but that doesn't bother you!!!

Judge Walker wasn't forced to retire........his retirement was more than likely already in place.....and it's not 44 states, more like 32!!!

Peace!!!

[Frank Rizzo]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
"Don't bother" Translation: He's right, but I have no argument and I don't like him. Too Funny!
You are born with your rights. The end.

So twelve-year-olds can vote?

A woman of 23 can become President?

Same-sex couples can marry?

Great! We are now the Everyone Has Rights To Everything And No Rules Apply States of America!

Argument over.

[Mike DiRucci]

Frisbee wrote:

<quoted text>Don't bother. These two are FAR too stupid to read the document in question. They'll cling to whack-job blogger and not bother to read something as simple as the 9th amendment:
The ENUMERATION in the CONSTITUTION, of certain RIGHTS...

If men can bestow rights they are not rights at all for they can easily be taken away.

You are born with your rights. Not given them by the government.

Sorry you are so dumb you think the founders were "whack jobs". They weren't.

[NorCal Native]

Brian_G wrote:

<quoted text>Maybe you admire that institutional candor as if truth and law have a relationship with justice.
.
<quoted text>Changing written law; it never existed before Judge Walker other than renegade, out of order court justices.
.
<quoted text>Excluded relevant evidence and testimony; check out the list in the appeals documents. There's question Walker excluded precedent.

Brian, again.....you'd be wrong, unlike you.....I've read the entire court documents on the Prop 8 trial and the briefs by the proponents......and just because they feel that their evidence was excluded......DOESN'T mean it was!!!

[Mike DiRucci]

Frank Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Bruno! If you're going to make racist remarks, make an educated one.
Monkeys are not descended from apes, nor vice-versa. They share a common ancester deep in the past, but they are very distinct groups. Even within these groups, the various species are very distinct and highly evolved, although certain individuals (usually living too close to the petrochemical fields of the LA basin) seem less evolved than others.
Please see the following chart:
http://elearning.la.psu.edu/anth22/lesson_2/i...
BTW: Thank you for clarifying that not only are you a knuckle-dragging homophobe, you're a slacked-jaw racist.
Well done!

You've already established your homophobia by continually using "you're gay" as an insult against me and others. Racism is probably not far behind.

[NorCal Native]

Tim Shields wrote:

Keep checking down there, three things are missing, equipment and balls.

Just because women don't have balls as you call them.....doesn't mean they don't have the courage to fight and die for their Country......THEY DO AND HAVE!!!

I wasn't discussing nor mentioned other Countries.......but women have fought and died for their Country as well!!!

[Mike DiRucci]

justsayN wrote:

<quoted text>
Says who?
The only right you are born with is the ones the Government grants you and they can taken away just as easily, stop kidding yourself. America is not a Democracy and speech ain't free.

Even angry malcontents are born with all their rights. If the government can give you rights, they can just as easily take them away, therefore they are not rights at all.

It's too bad many people don't really understand the genius of our Constitution.

[Mike DiRucci]

Frank Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
So twelve-year-olds can vote?
A woman of 23 can become President?
Same-sex couples can marry?
Great! We are now the Everyone Has Rights To Everything And No Rules Apply States of America!
Argument over.

None on your list are rights you dope.

[Frank Rizzo]

[QUOTE who="Ms. Idiotic"]<quoted text>
You've already established your homophobia by continually using "you're gay" as an insult against me and others. Racism is probably not far behind.[/QUOTE]

Something,

I have never called you "gay". I've called you a "pissy little girl".

Now, if you can find somewhere where I did call you gay, I will be more than happy to retract my statement and apologize.

[Frank Rizzo]

[QUOTE who="Ms. Idiotic"]<quoted text>
None on your list are rights you dope.[/QUOTE]

I think the women of the 19th century might have a different view on whether or not voting is a "right".

[Mike DiRucci]

Frank Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Something,
I have never called you "gay". I've called you a "pissy little girl".
Now, if you can find somewhere where I did call you gay, I will be more than happy to retract my statement and apologize.

Not only are you a homophobe, you are also using ad hominem. I am wrong because I'm a pissy little girl? Are pissy little girls wrong?

You get frustrated and have no imagination or sense of humor. So you imply that I am a pissy little girl (thinly veiled implication of gayness) thinking I give a sh!t. I don't. Nothing wrong with gay now is there fancypants?

[Frank Rizzo]

Ms Idiotic wrote:

<quoted text>
Not only are you a homophobe, you are also using ad hominem. I am wrong because I'm a pissy little girl? Are pissy little girls wrong?
You get frustrated and have no imagination or sense of humor. So you imply that I am a pissy little girl (thinly veiled implication of gayness) thinking I give a sh!t. I don't. Nothing wrong with gay now is there fancypants?

"Ad hominem" to what?

You said I called you gay. I refuted that I did not call you gay, but that I had called you a "pissy little girl". At no point in my response did I newly call you a "pissy little girl".

Now had I stated something like "You are wrong because you are a pissy little girl", then you'd have a point. But let me clarify that what I said was: Your are wrong because I never called you gay; and that when I did call you something, the thing I called you was "a pissy little girl".

Now stop acting like a pissy little queen, you idiot.

[Mike DiRucci]

Frank Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
I think the women of the 19th century might have a different view on whether or not voting is a "right".

http://www.fairvote.org/voting-a-right-a-priv...

[Mike DiRucci]

Frank Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
"Ad hominem" to what?
You said I called you gay. I refuted that I did not call you gay, but that I had called you a "pissy little girl". At no point in my response did I newly call you a "pissy little girl".
Now had I stated something like "You are wrong because you are a pissy little girl", then you'd have a point. But let me clarify that what I said was: Your are wrong because I never called you gay; and that when I did call you something, the thing I called you was "a pissy little girl".
Now stop acting like a pissy little queen, you idiot.

So now I'm a little queen. But of course you don't mean gay! Priceless.

[Frank Rizzo]

Ms Idiotic wrote:

<quoted text>
http://www.fairvote.org/voting-a-right-a-priv...

Second paragraph--Second word:

http://www.archives.gov/global-pages/larger-i...