Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201809 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

RetardO

La Puente, CA

#163633 Oct 17, 2012
If it's not worth posting about then you'll find i here.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#163634 Oct 17, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, Eve was made from Adam's rib. Eve would have had the same DNA Adam did. Eve would have been a man. Looks like god did make Adam and Steve after all!! <=====3
But then God changed Steve to Eve, so obviously the God of the Bible is just fine with transgendered folks...

“I'm here with bells on.”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#163635 Oct 17, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
The Constitution does not give you rights. You are born with all your rights.
Unless you're an 'anchor baby', or are born in a country other than America...
RetardO

La Puente, CA

#163636 Oct 17, 2012
iF IT'S NOT WORTH POSTING ABOUT THEN YOU'LL FIND IT HERE.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#163637 Oct 17, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
I was there in the 70's. It was a relatively obscure disease until it spread like wildfire through the gays, when it gained widespread notice.Guess what was causing its prolific spread ?# guesses and the first 2 don't count count. I think there is a bus heading to Realityville, you should buy a ticket.....
Silly child. It was a relatively obscure disease AMONG THE HETEROSEXUALS until it hit that segment of the gay community that was engaged in unprotected promiscuous sex.

And THAT is why I promote same sex marriage, the teaching of the proper use of, and the need for, barrier based contraception, and the joys of fidelity.

Why would I waste money on a bus ticket when I live in reality? I guess that you are just too unfamiliar with what reality looks like to recognize it...

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#163638 Oct 17, 2012
Liam R wrote:
<quoted text>
But then God changed Steve to Eve, so obviously the God of the Bible is just fine with transgendered folks...
LOL. So true.:)

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#163639 Oct 17, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't you know that 2 men engaging in anal sex is unnatural ? Biology 101. Every part has a purpose.....
Silly child, once again... ALL species of mammals have been documented with member engaging is same sex relations. So by definitions, it IS natural. Now, if you want to say that it is icky, well then I can't really argue with you, since I am not interested in it either.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#163640 Oct 17, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you, Liam, damnit, half of me likes you.....you make sense half of the time.
I make sense ALL of the time, you just don't realize it yet...
:)

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#163641 Oct 17, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
This has nothing to do with religion, so come up with a rational argument.
Ah, but the argument against SSM is based entirely on religion. And while science fiction is not a religion (even if some fans think that it is a way of life...), SF does provide various conceptual visions of possible futures, including some very positive images that we all can and should work to bring into fruition.
RTPBS ers

La Puente, CA

#163642 Oct 17, 2012
Your mean to tell me BS stands for Blood Suckers?

What about RTPBS?

Republican Tea Party Blood Suckers..

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#163643 Oct 17, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
An activist judge is one who operates with a bias, or a hidden agenda. And we all know there is a gay agenda, like forcing the majority of us to accept gay marriage. If it is natural, then so must murder and rape be natural, using your own "it exist, so it must be right" logic. Why do we punish murderers and rapists ? Because society, as a whole, has deemed it to be unacceptable to commit certain acts, moron. And if we do not have the right to set standards for ourselves, then why do we have prisons at all ? Answer that, idiot. Or did I go too fast ?
FAR more to the point, rape and murder actually cause HARM. Same sex marriage does not.

Do you need help understanding the difference between "consensual" and "unconsensual" actions?
Tata

Westminster, CA

#163644 Oct 17, 2012
Frank Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
And what queer name would that be, Tata--I mean, Wilson,--I mean, Bruno...?
Besides, what's wrong with this queer name? At least it's not Mike DiRucci---That's a girls name!
I use my own names, not the names of others in this thread to post as their rivals. You are a troll
Tata

Westminster, CA

#163645 Oct 17, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? Monkeys have straight hair, thin lips, light skin and flat butts.
I've got kinky hair, BJ lips, copper skin, and while Sir-Mix-a-lot might not find me attractive, my butt is hardly flat.
What about you?
<quoted text>
Really? Monkeys have straight hair, thin lips, light skin and flat butts.
Again, stupid, it's a simple fact that racists lie you use "monkey" as a racist slur.
If the shoe fits wear it. No one besides you and the troll Rizzo will deny that there is a huge similarity between blacks and apes, gorillas, monkeys etc. the world knows it and you brought the entire identity issue up any way so STFU
RetardO

La Puente, CA

#163646 Oct 17, 2012
Never mind it wasn't important.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#163647 Oct 17, 2012
Tata aka boob wrote:
<quoted text>
If the shoe fits wear it. No one besides you and the troll Rizzo will deny that there is a huge similarity between blacks and apes, gorillas, monkeys etc. the world knows it and you brought the entire identity issue up any way so STFU
Boob, ALL people are apes, so to say there are similarities between black people and apes is well, pointless.
And what do black people and monkeys have in common again? The light skin? Straight hair? The thin lips? What about the flat butts?
"Monkey" is just a stupid racial slur used by morons like you.
And so is "ape", as all humans are apes. Using that term as a racial slur it like calling black people "mammals" as an insult.

So, why are fundies such racists? Didn't Jesus think enough of black people to die for us?

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#163648 Oct 17, 2012
Frisbee wrote:
<quoted text>
Two presidents managed to find a different choice for 15 years (he gassed his people in 1988), until W decided they needed a lie because Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11.
...
I can certainly agree with you that Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11, and leaving him in power would have kept Iraq as a secular nation not under the control of Islamic jihadists.
RetardO

La Puente, CA

#163649 Oct 17, 2012
Just can't hold your own today, can you?
Jose

Miami, FL

#163650 Oct 17, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are fundies such racists? and stupid, look at this pic...
http://www.rexwallpapers.com/wallpaper/Monkey...
Almost no lips. Straight hair, light skin, and where is the butt?
The Romans had the right idea, just too few lions.
I have to say that I "respect" them more when they stop hiding behind "Fiscal conservatism" "Obama is an illegal" and countless other BS and they just show what they are about.

The tea party made no secret what they were about when they first marched in Broward, Florida right after Obama was elected but over time the pros have taken over and polished it up.
Same people with same mind set but with polished rhetoric .

T-shirt at Romney rally says 'Put the white back in the White House'

http://now.msn.com/romney-supporter-t-shirt-s...

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#163651 Oct 17, 2012
Frisbee wrote:
<quoted text>
Says the guy who thinks the Constitution doesn't Enumerate Rights.....
So we are back on this childish nonsense now that you had your a$$ handed to you with the discussion of the 14th Amendment.

Your feeble mind has failed you again. You are trying to hard to have that "gotcha" moment so you can get that gold star.

The design of the Constitution was to enumerate certain powers and provide a framework for our government. Through this framework the freedom and right's of the people would be preserved. In not ONE section of the original body of the Constitution will you find a SINGLE "right" outlined. Though one could split hairs in a vain attempt, which I sure you would, to prove me wrong that we do have the "right" to a Republican form of government as outlined in Article IV Sec 4.

In your attempt to gain brownie points you have taken my comments out of context. The previous discussion was in regards to the central purpose of the Constitution, which clearly was to enumerate powers- anyone who has studied the journal on the Constitutional Convention knows this- and claim that I stated there are NO right's outlined in the Constitution.

Now let me give you an education, lord knows you need one.

The original text of the Constitution as presented to the States for ratification did not enumerate a single right- yes we know about Article IV sec 4 we have been over it. During the ratification debates- notably Virginia and New York- issue was taken that the new constitution did not go far enough, and the Federal Government could overstep its enumerated powers treading on the right's of the citizens, as such they demanded a "Bill of Right's" to specifically protect those right's they held most dear. Madison advised against this, stating that doing so would undermine the entire document and lead Government to believe they had those powers all the time even though they lacked the enumeration of power in those areas. Madison's concern is the precise reason why we have the 9th and 10th Amendment.

So to say the Constitution is an enumeration of "right's" as you claim is patently false. If that were the case we would have very few "right's", in fact they would take up less than a page.

No go educate yourself so we can attempt to have an intelligent conversation.
Frank Rizzo

Alhambra, CA

#163652 Oct 17, 2012
Tata wrote:
<quoted text>
I use my own names, not the names of others in this thread to post as their rivals. You are a troll
[Psst....Bruno....Retarded Frank Rizzo's name isn't really Frank Rizzo....]

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Monterey Public Officials VIOLATING FEDERAL LAWS Tue Un agenda 21 and ... 4
public officials violating federal laws May 24 Un agenda 21 and ... 3
the music thread (Apr '12) May 23 Musikologist 19
News Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) May 23 ikestubbs 1,535
News Letters: Charter application superior (Jan '11) May 21 Yin Simons 13
News Taking extraordinary measures to wear an extrao... May 18 outtogether 2
News Police: Armed robbery at Santa Cruz sandwich sh... May 11 bump 1
More from around the web

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]