Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Comic Relief]

How many hair-balls did you cough up today?

[chuxxley]

jacques renault wrote:

<quoted text>
winson's nephew will book a Bed and Breakfast, and after Mom and Pop refuse a room to two men dressed as Indiana Jones, man squared will sue--you're unfamiliar with elder abuse by homosexuals?
then they'll target silver-haired Christian wedding photographers

... then they'll both walk down Main Street arguing about whose turn it is to be on the bottom tonight and who has to wear the strapped rubber ball in their mouth.

[Comic Relief]

There's no crying in postings.

[mikey]

Another activist judge going against the will of the Moral Majority. Marriage is has been and will always be between a Man and a Women.

[Comic Relief]

Glendora, California racists city council member's supported those AZ racists laws.

Joseph Santora - republican

Karen Davis - lost in politics

Gene Murabito - republican

Judy Nelson - tea bagger

Douglas Tessitor - republican - tea bagger

What he failed to note is Los Angeles is nearly half Latino, and this is National Hispanic Heritage Month.

Some Racists have tried to repeal Los angeles boycott of Arizona.

Most Angelenos believe discrimination is evil an disgusting.

Republican tea baggers appear to be in another low earth orbit, getting ready for a blazing hot reentry.

If you think these guys sound like a barrel o' crazy, check out some of the down-ticket candidates, like the Arizona state rep. who wants African Americans to be grateful for slavery.

[Rose_NoHo]

jacques renault wrote:

<quoted text>
winson's nephew will book a Bed and Breakfast, and after Mom and Pop refuse a room to two men dressed as Indiana Jones,

Interesting fantasy you have there...

jacques renault wrote:

man squared will sue--you're unfamiliar with elder abuse by homosexuals?

BS.

jacques renault wrote:

then they'll target silver-haired Christian wedding photographers

Boo hoo.

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
A Chongo-monkey chatters. Does anyone care ?

Why are you fundies such racists?
Is it just because you are irrational and stupid?
And why do you racists call black people "monkeys" when monkeys have light skin, thin lips, straight hair and flat butts?

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Including my right to not witness a giant dildoe in a gay parade, impeding my right to use Main Street freely ?

Quit searching for images of them then.
"Main Street". LOL. You've never seen a gay pride parade IRL, have you?

[Winston Smith]

Mike DiRucci wrote:

<quoted text>
If there weren't differing opinions no matter how dumb or smart, then it would be very boring. Think about it. Imagine if only "frisbee" was here posting his dopey nonsense about "owning" people etc. THAT would be boring!

Differing opinions are fine by me. The boring bit is the continuous litany of drivel coming from most of the opposing posters. About the only one in here with any interesting posts opposing is AKpilot. The rest of 'em amount to little more than taunting and juvenile insults. Or allegations of pending doom should gay couples be allowed to marry. And we can't leave off the ill informed blathering about HIV either.

[Winston Smith]

mikey wrote:

Another activist judge going against the will of the Moral Majority. Marriage is has been and will always be between a Man and a Women.

The "Moral Majority" is neither.

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
That means that your tranny ass doesn't belong in the world, and you should have been incinerated long ago....right at the abortion clinic, instead of being hatched in the psycho ward, in a petrie jar, marked "abortion, not quite finished"

Oh, fundie, that's unkind speech!
"So get rid of all evil behavior. Be done with all deceit, hypocrisy, jealousy, and all unkind speech." 1 Peter 2:1

[Rose_NoHo]

mikey wrote:

Another activist judge going against the will of the Moral Majority. Marriage is has been and will always be between a Man and a Women.

There is no such thing as an "activist judge", it's just one of many con dumb boogie men.
And there is nothing moral about going against the 14th Amendment. It's unAmerican.

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry yourself, stupid, there are lots of things wrong with your lifestyle. Are you saying that to try to be edgy, or do you honestly believe that tripe you're spouting ?
Example off the top of my head: child porn is wrong,

Rose's Law...

R Hudson wrote:

<
even if all parties consent to it. So there's that ...

Children can't give consent in any meaningful way.

[Comic Relief]

Always another sticky-wicket to deal with.

[Smokin Joe]

THE LAST TEA BUTTLICKER wrote:

<quoted text>
im guessin you're not quite out of your teens yet.

Wrong !!!!

[Smokin Joe]

Winston Smith wrote:

<quoted text>
Sooo, in addition to being miserable, you're an attention wh@re.

You are a pathetic FK

[Rose_NoHo]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh my. Aren't you getting abusive now, I must've gotten on your last nerve, eh ?
Marriage is a vital social institution between two members of the opposite sex. It goes way beyond just an emotional relationship---it serves a vital role inthe stability and continuity of our society, something which homosexual marriages cannot provide. Unfortunately, the biggest victory of the gay movement has been to shift the debate from a 'behavior' to identity, whereby those that oppose homosexuality are considered bigoted or hateful.

You're both.

R Hudson wrote:

They have equated it to the Civil Rights Movement, seeking to obtain the rights granted under the constitution to all races or religions.

All US citizens should get equal rights.

R Hudson wrote:

Sexual behavior does not fall into either category!It is not about homosexuals wanting to enter into a 'marriage' so much as it is about them wanting to gain acceptance into mainstream society by redefining the traditional definition of the institution. It is a threat to society.

How?

R Hudson wrote:

It is not nature's way.

Eating your young is nature's way.

R Hudson wrote:

I just don't want you pushing your agenda on the majority who are not.

What, exactly is this "agenda"?

R Hudson wrote:

This is just about sexual preference--keep it in the bedroom. It is not about being denied any constitutional rights.

Yes, it is. It's a matter of equal rights for men and women.

R Hudson wrote:

This whole issue ties up valuable government resources and time, just to satisfy your need to be accepted, which was where my feelings were, accepting that you wish to be gay. It is the forceful way you are trying to redefine the very fabric of the meaning of marriage. It has been a traditionally defined ceremony for millenia, giving the aforementioned stability and definition to a special bond between man and woman. You wish to include yourselves in a way that renders the whole meaning obsolete and pointless. Why do you not simply accept your relationships with a separate and differing name and stop try to mimic us ? you are attempting to appropriate something you are not entitled to. Once you have achieved the desired result, now comes the public display of affection, gay parades,gay rallies, non-stop bombardment. The majority of us find this revolting and now have to avert our eyes and make explanations to our children

Rose's Law:
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"
If you are so stupid you can't figure out how to tell your kids, "Some men like women, some like men. Some women like men, some like women.", then maybe you should get a vasectomy.

R Hudson wrote:

that we never used to. This is part of the threat, the simple comfort we used to take for granted, now swept away. If I had a child who was gay, I would still love him , but that does not mean I have accept or condone the bad behavior.
How's that for shutting up, b!tch ?

Would have been better if you had just shut up, because you didn't explain how homosexuality is a threat to society. And, dummy, I'm straight.

[Mike DiRucci]

R Hudson wrote:

<quoted text>
And frisbee is owned!!!

He was a lot of fun. I think he's all played out now though, tells me I "don't merit further attention". I'll keep his dopey frisbee picture up for a while longer, maybe he'll bite.

[Comic Relief]

Your right r.c.h. did do comedy

[Smokin Joe]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
You're both.
<quoted text>
All US citizens should get equal rights.
<quoted text>
How?
<quoted text>
Eating your young is nature's way.
<quoted text>
What, exactly is this "agenda"?
<quoted text>
Yes, it is. It's a matter of equal rights for men and women.
<quoted text>
Rose's Law:
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"
If you are so stupid you can't figure out how to tell your kids, "Some men like women, some like men. Some women like men, some like women.", then maybe you should get a vasectomy.
<quoted text>
Would have been better if you had just shut up, because you didn't explain how homosexuality is a threat to society. And, dummy, I'm straight.

You are reapeatig yourself again you tranny FKtard