Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201864 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#162903 Oct 13, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
So we are back to that ? Off-Topic. I made no racist statements.
Why bother to lie? It's up here for every one to see.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#162904 Oct 13, 2012
Smokin Joe wrote:
<quoted text>
I've seen ... people with thin lips, light skin, straight hair and flat butts .. so it's a monkey. Keep pulling hte race card you tranny
Hey, hudson, when you use a sock puppet, don't make it so obvious.
BTW, your racial slur has been reported.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#162905 Oct 13, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
and you call me a fundie ? Howling at you, now. Why try to throw the bible at me ? You have been mocking it for eternity. Now it is your weapon ? Laughing my ass off at you.
Fundies like you claim to believe the buy-bull, that's why I quote it to you.
You are too stupid to understand that, so you laugh.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#162906 Oct 13, 2012
THE LAST TEA BUTTLICKER wrote:
<quoted text>
all we need as a race is sperm and egg....
we could all be super gay and still make offspring??
what is your actual arguement here??
that marriage is needed for it to be a social agrangement?? where both parent share the responsibilities...??
but again, this can be acheived by adult commmunication between parents who ARNT married??
seeing as how the divorce rate is sky high(still) this is kind of a silly arguement to be having anyhow...
it is beneficial for both parents to be in a childs life on a super regular basis!!! but they dont have to be straight or be married to one another...
I think that notion is becoming slowly extinct.
You can stomp your feet all you like, it doesn't change the facts of where the SCOTUS stands on the issue.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#162907 Oct 13, 2012
Frisbee wrote:
<quoted text>He can't even admit he was wrong about Marriage being a right in the first place, even though that's what the Loving decision says. He also can't admit he's wrong when he absurdly claims, of all things, that the Constitution doesn't enumerate Rights. He's clinging to THAT nonsense.
You'll never get him to stand up like a man and admit any fault.
What you'll get is a lot of weaselly back-pedaling and attempts to retroactively revise his declarations. A lot of "depends on what your definition of 'is' is" type pathetic attempts at dodging are coming your way.
You aren't very bright are you?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#162908 Oct 13, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, I know...
You know something Rose?? That must be a new thing for you.
THE LAST TEA BUTTLICKER

Anderson, CA

#162910 Oct 13, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You can stomp your feet all you like, it doesn't change the facts of where the SCOTUS stands on the issue.
stomping my feet??

I guess I would be stomping them, if I was gay and wanted to get married to someone...BUT im not and I dont.

I was just telling who ever I was reponding to??(was it you?)

that marraige isnt really ABSOLUTELY needed for our race to survive.

doma will eventaully go the way that many other bigoted laws have gone....

extinction.
THE LAST TEA BUTTLICKER

Anderson, CA

#162911 Oct 13, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Including my right to not witness a giant dildoe in a gay parade, impeding my right to use Main Street freely ?
just stay home on gay day...

they likely dont want bigots there anyways....

I just find that kind of stuff funny...

you must have deep problems if a gay guy in the gay pride parade gives you offense.

you are a serious bigot and a troll.

I can understand why you answer every little stoopid post.

you dont have much to say that is not full of hate and bigotry..

you should find a thread where people think JUST like you,(and they are out there) so you can find a more appropriate home.

other wise you can just stay here and spew hate.....and get called out for it...
THE LAST TEA BUTTLICKER

Anderson, CA

#162912 Oct 13, 2012
jacques renault wrote:
<quoted text>
winson's nephew will book a Bed and Breakfast, and after Mom and Pop refuse a room to two men dressed as Indiana Jones, man squared will sue--you're unfamiliar with elder abuse by homosexuals?
then they'll target silver-haired Christian wedding photographers
elder abuse by homosexuals??

do you have any formal studies you can point to??

im very shocked and want to know more!!

studies?? that arnt sponsored by some religious institution??
THE LAST TEA BUTTLICKER

Anderson, CA

#162913 Oct 13, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
That means that your tranny ass doesn't belong in the world, and you should have been incinerated long ago....right at the abortion clinic, instead of being hatched in the psycho ward, in a petrie jar, marked "abortion, not quite finished"
there is that HiTLER thing coming out, with the backwoods(see deliverance) troll from OHIO.

right wingers ALWAYS say things like that when they are refering to people they dislike.

sorry pal...even in Ohio, you have deal with this diverse nation....
I kinda feel sorry for bigots like you...seeing as how america is becoming more open and diverse at the same time.

people are coming out of the closet in droves.....

so your archie bunker era of bigotry is pretty much over....

that is who you remind me of...archie bunker....

sitting there typing, hating everyone...

thats right, you are the modern version of that dock troll.

ps: for the first time ever?? in 2012? a marority of people accept gaydom!! your time is limited.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#162914 Oct 13, 2012
THE LAST TEA BUTTLICKER wrote:
<quoted text>
stomping my feet??
I guess I would be stomping them, if I was gay and wanted to get married to someone...BUT im not and I dont.
I was just telling who ever I was reponding to??(was it you?)
that marraige isnt really ABSOLUTELY needed for our race to survive.
doma will eventaully go the way that many other bigoted laws have gone....
extinction.
Yawn.. DOMA should go away because the Federal Government lacks the enumerated power under the Constitution to regulate or define marriage.

It's a State issue, and has nothing to do with whether the law is "bigoted" or not.

BTW, if you can't keep up with the conversation, and whom you are responding to, then perhaps you aren't intelligent enough to engage in said conversation and should simply see your way out of it.

And another thing, perhaps you should learn a little grammar and invest in a spell checker? It would be easier to take you seriously if you didn't type like a 5 year old.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#162924 Oct 13, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Yawn.. DOMA should go away because the Federal Government lacks the enumerated power under the Constitution to regulate or define marriage.
It's a State issue, and has nothing to do with whether the law is "bigoted" or not.
BTW, if you can't keep up with the conversation, and whom you are responding to, then perhaps you aren't intelligent enough to engage in said conversation and should simply see your way out of it.
And another thing, perhaps you should learn a little grammar and invest in a spell checker? It would be easier to take you seriously if you didn't type like a 5 year old.
You idiots are amazing. Who would of thought that a post which claims DOMA is unconstitutional would get 6 poor judge-its??

Goes to show that you are all just a bunch of sheep who can't think for yourselves.
THE LAST TEA BUTTLICKER

Anderson, CA

#162929 Oct 13, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Yawn.. DOMA should go away because the Federal Government lacks the enumerated power under the Constitution to regulate or define marriage.
It's a State issue, and has nothing to do with whether the law is "bigoted" or not.
BTW, if you can't keep up with the conversation, and whom you are responding to, then perhaps you aren't intelligent enough to engage in said conversation and should simply see your way out of it.
And another thing, perhaps you should learn a little grammar and invest in a spell checker? It would be easier to take you seriously if you didn't type like a 5 year old.
being a states rights activist, id have to agree with you..

except it isnt just an issue like alcohol usage, gamblimg, medical pot, or bunny ranches.

it is a civil rights issue.

that is where ill let the fedreal government tell the most bigoted steas what to do...

we all must have the same rights from state to state...or our country is just a patchwork of heehaw republics!! do you want that?

marriage should be fedreally protected right for everyone...including the LGBT community ...voting is also a right...

I take offense to the purgeing of voter rolls....good thing the federal courts are stepping in and shooting down the bigots...

“"Secular,YES , Theocracy,NO"”

Since: Aug 09

Northern California

#162930 Oct 13, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Randy's Law: Morons with no ability to produce new arguments quote "Morons Law" ad nauseum...
Oh,Do you mean like your off topic unintelligent babble? So says the biggest spammer of nothing on the board! LOL,Pot,again meet kettle! All you post is stereotypical hate and B.S.! How about you STFU and move along now little girl!
THE LAST TEA BUTTLICKER

Anderson, CA

#162931 Oct 13, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
So I have to hide in my house to avoid vulgarities and a general lowering of the bar in my own country ? And you poofs don't have to show any class by keeping the phallic symbols away from public display, so as not to offend ? And you say that a majority of us accept this generally low class as ok, huh ? Make up any poll results that you like, I recognize all the lies that I am told. Why don't you take some reading lessons? I said the giant dildoe was offensive, not the polite gay guy who doesn't use a penis as his battle symbol...
just for a day....

or you can go and enjoy yourself at the parade....

just dont try and tell others how to express themselves...

if their pararde has the approval of the city and the planning dept??

you should be satisified, as there are no official laws that support your bigotry on a local level..

you should slow down, dont get so flustered by me.

I said that a majority of americans now accept that the LGBT community exists.... it is not a made up poll, just google it....

but what is the big deal??

they let everybody march!!

it called the first amendment.

I know you want two constitutions??? but the rest of us are fine with just one...

BTW, I am a straight gay rights supporter, not an actual gay person..

just to let you know

btw, most lgbt are about the highest class of people ive ever met...
im guessing you dont know many gay folks...

that is how people coming out has flipped that poll into the plus for the LGBT community to be accepted by a slim majority.

once a straight person realizes that someone they love is gay??
they soften their stance....

at least if they have any semblance of humanity...

it time for you to meet a classy gay person you love!!!

in other words, you probabaly already know some, but just dont know their gay yet.
RiccardoFire

Sacramento, CA

#162938 Oct 13, 2012
If anyone didn't realize that Obama is the most arrogant U.S. President ever, they certainly should now. And he will hang ANYONE out to dry to further his intensely personal ambitions - his "dreams" from his father. Ambassador Stevens learned that the hard way.

Obama let the gay man suffer in Libya. Look what they did to his body.
THE LAST TEA BUTTLICKER

Anderson, CA

#162939 Oct 13, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
I am telling others that they must not offend people that have no desire to view sexual depravities.
The approval of the city and planning dept.? How about class and consideration for your fellow man ?
Why should I be satisified (misspelled, for your ease of reading, no spell checker yet ?) that decency laws are not present to protect us from the absolute revolting nature of gay "parardes"(misspelle d, for your ease of reading, no spell checker yet ?)
Slow down ? Try keeping up....
And you stated that a majority SUPPORT gay issues, not merely accept its existence.
As far as letting everybody march, I never saw a dildoe in a parade until poofs got the right to parade and prance around, throwing themselves in our faces.
The 1st Amendment does not make decency laws invalid.
I like the Constitution that we have used for the last century, not the constantly rewritten one that we are now handed...
As far as highest class of people that you have ever met, try getting out into the world and you might meet high caliber people more often and also discover that gays are not so high class after all...
I have known many gays in my day, and most of those are now dead from AIDS, casualties of the 70's, But they would not have agreed with offending people with new-found rights that they were beaten up for fighting for, they would have sneered at the childish behavior of obscene parades. They would have disowned the filth that passes for freedom of expression and made the claim to keep offensive behavior away from the rest of us, so as to allow us to not erect fences. They would not have agreed with teaching anything at all in schools, they would have said "keep it away from children".
So, please do not presume to speculate on who I may or not know, you'd be surprised who I have known in my time. I am merely against the same sex marriage angle and the indoctrination in school issues, and against Chongo. I am also against idiots having access to computers.
And I readily admit to trolling, anyone else ready to confess ?
thnaks for letting us know more about you....

but ill still place a unbigoted open mined person of any persuation over your class......which is a bigoted one I guess..

stay home on gay pride day if you cant handle the costumes.....

what else can i say, you are fighting a losing battle against an inescapable tide....

hate all you want?? but id spend my limited time on earth wiser than telling people who arnt possibly ever going to listen to you your veiws..........

as you can tell, even on conservative topix.net .....our side has much more support...therefore you shpould spend your time doing less hating, and more lovin!!

im sorry you are bitter about where this country has naturally gone, socially.

I find your veiws and assumptions to be offensive and bigoted....

and a breach of decency.....am I asking you to stay home??

only if you feel uncomfortable when other express themsleves...?

somehow I feel like you must have a problem with this??????????
THE LAST TEA BUTTLICKER

Anderson, CA

#162940 Oct 13, 2012
you cant possibly understand the huge difference bewteen spreading love on these threads as opposed to living to put down people for their lifestyle.

I feel much pity for you sir backwoods.
THE LAST TEA BUTTLICKER

Anderson, CA

#162941 Oct 13, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
If anyone didn't realize that Obama is the most arrogant U.S. President ever, they certainly should now. And he will hang ANYONE out to dry to further his intensely personal ambitions - his "dreams" from his father. Ambassador Stevens learned that the hard way.
Obama let the gay man suffer in Libya. Look what they did to his body.
still stuck in bengazi huh???

ill book you a flight home.....eh?

the next debate is just days away....

you need to get back to reality.

romney/rand hit Obama on china....

id expect obama to hit him back...

on the outsourcing thing!!
RiccardoFire

Sacramento, CA

#162942 Oct 13, 2012
In late May, Wash. DC-based investigative journalist Wayne Madsen had a bombshell revelation about Obama’s membership in a Chicago gay club, Man’s Country. Madsen also reported on Obama’s sexual relationships with other men, including named D.C. politicians and Donald Young, the openly-gay choir-director of the church in Chicago of which Obama was a member for some 20 years — Jeremy Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ black liberation theology. Obama’s relationship with Young was confirmed by Larry Sinclair, who claims to have had two sex-cocaine trysts with Obama.

There were two other openly gay men in Wright’s church: Larry Bland and Nate Spencer. In late 2007, as Obama began his ascent to be the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee, in a span of 1½ months, all three men “conveniently” died:

Bland was murdered execution-style on November 17, 2007;
Young was murdered execution-style on December 24, 2007;
Spencer reportedly died of septicemia, pneumonia, and HIV on December 26, 2007.

http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2010/0...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Aug 27 Norbert of Norview 71,944
News SD-area man gets 14 years for abusing wife (Jan '11) Aug 22 dGo mnaDde lyHo i... 5
News Fear mongering in Spreckels will have been in vain Aug 7 I am sorry 1
Monterey Public Officials VIOLATING FEDERAL LAWS Aug 7 Un agenda 21 and ... 6
News Del Rey Oaks Garden Center grand opening schedu... Jul '15 Kathi Buckley Smith 1
drugs Jul '15 JayJay 2
News Sex offender Tom Pollacci pleads not guilty to ... (Mar '09) Jul '15 martin5 360
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Monterey Mortgages