Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201887 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#162400 Oct 7, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I said, you don't like the decision anymore.
It's OK Rose. You will get over it.
Liar. I love the decision. I'm glad interracial marriage isn't illegal.

You don't have any real arguments, so you lie about my positions.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#162401 Oct 7, 2012
Ronald wrote:
I love my Homosexual friends, the lesbians, and yes, even the simple African.(
Why are fundies such racists?
(Did bother reading the rest of your post.)
Christianity = hate!
That's what I've learned from Topix.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#162402 Oct 7, 2012
Jedi Mind_Tricker wrote:
<quoted text>When will education find your crew. The 14th Amendment does not support your position.
There is a dispute, and it figured in the Proposition 8 case, over the current meaning and impact of a decision the Supreme Court made in 1972, in the case of Baker v. Nelson. There, without briefing and hearing, the Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by a Minnesota gay couple. The Minnesota Supreme Court had rejected their claim that denial of a marriage license for them violated their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. That “summary dismissal” is a binding precedent, just as a full-scale decision would be, if a later case is found to be a close or exact parallel to the Baker lawsuit.
The 14th Amendment grants all US citizens equal protection, so denying all US citizens equal protection violates the 14th Amendment.

This isn't rocket surgery...

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#162403 Oct 7, 2012
Ronald wrote:
<quoted text>
Rose_NoHo".
Yes. I agree. If Africans
Why are fundie such racists?
(I don't bother to read your posts.)
The Romans had the right idea, just too few lions.
Think how much better our world would be without the scourge of that hateful, racist religion, Christianity!

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#162404 Oct 7, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, let's try this ....
Although the evidence on child outcomes is sketchy, the evidence does suggest that children raised by lesbians or gay men are more likely to experience gender and sexual disorders. Judith Stacey—an advocate for SSM and a sociologist—reviewed the literature on child outcomes and found the following:“lesbian parenting may free daughters and sons from a broad but uneven range of traditional gender prescriptions.” Her conclusion here is based on studies that show that sons of lesbians are less masculine and that daughters of lesbians are more masculine. She also found that a “significantly greater proportion of young adult children raised by lesbian mothers than those raised by heterosexual mothers… reported having a homoerotic relationship.” Stacey also observes that children of lesbians are more likely to report homoerotic attractions. Her review must be view judiciously, given the methodological flaws detailed by Professor Nock in the literature as a whole. Nevertheless, theses studies give some credence to conservative concerns about the effects of SS couple parenting.
*Judith Stacey and Timothy Biblarz. 2001.“(How) Does the Sexual Orientation of Parents Matter?” American Sociological Review 66: 159-183. See especially pp. 168-171
Rose's Law:
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"

Your copy/paste babble doesn't show anything wrong with homosexuality. There is nothing wrong with having a homoerotic relationship or attraction.
Ronald

Bellflower, CA

#162405 Oct 7, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are fundies such racists?
(Did bother reading the rest of your post.)
Christianity = hate!
That's what I've learned from Topix.
Rose_NoHo.

How come every time I come out in support of your position you attack me?

Ronald

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#162407 Oct 7, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Here it is. I found it, even though you said said nothing comes up.....
http://www.rentboy.com/
Stupid, that's not a pedophile site! AND I wrote it as "rent boy dot com" in the post you replied to (guess that was too complex for you to understand), I did that so people wouldn't accidentally click on an adults' only link.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#162408 Oct 7, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
No, we call rose_no-hope a monkey because it has the intellect of an ape. We all have valid points that have been made repeatedly, only to have to hear chongo use "roses law" as if it is an authority on the matter, and that resortation to childish name calling has been committed by your hero, rose_no-hope,
You mean childish name calling like calling me "rose_no-hope"?
R Hudson wrote:
more than any other poster in here. And insofar as your claim goes, we heterosexual normal people are being forced into the unfortunate position of having to defend normality, for the sake of society.
Homosexuality is no threat to society.
R Hudson wrote:
Obsession ? If you poofs weren't forcing our children into having to learn about the whole sick phenomenon of gayness in school,
Rose's Law...
R Hudson wrote:
and by holding your detestable parades (complete with gigantic phallic symbols and men dressed as women) on Main Street USA, why, the whole issue would be avoidable. but due to your pushing of legislation, and your lobbying for "equal representation", which covers about 10% of the population, we are forced into polarization on the matter.
Oh, BTW, I love to watch 2 women having it off, who wouldn't want to be with a woman ? It is having to watch men prance around like they can be mistaken for women that makes me want to vomit.....Please, be clear on the matter.
You homophobes act as if you can't step outside without running into a gay pride parade. If you don't like them, quit finding out when they are going to be, and stop traveling to go see them. Problem solved.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#162409 Oct 7, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
In case you hadn't noticed, it is our country , too. With the laws being changed to suit a minority.
Still upset we got rid of Jim Crow Laws, huh?
R Hudson wrote:
We liked it the way it was, so if you want to accept them so freely, why don't YOU get the f_ck out of OUR country, where everything was good, and go form yourself a new one ?
Why don't you go form one where all people, even members of minority groups like blacks and gays, are *NOT* promised equal rights?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#162410 Oct 7, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, let's get technical......
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a lentivirus (a member of the retrovirus family) that causes acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS),[1][2] a condition in humans in which progressive failure of the immune system allows life-threatening opportunistic infections and cancers to thrive.
HIV
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
That's nice.
But that doesn't change the fact that HIV and AIDS are often used interchangeably, even though it's not technically correct. And it made sense to do in a post that said, "Anal sex causes HIV".

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#162411 Oct 7, 2012
Jenkins wrote:
<quoted text>Queer marriage should be outlawed for the sake of the little children.
Too easy...
Rose's Law

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#162412 Oct 7, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage, like the real people get to do ....
Stupid, I asked for a *special* right gay people are asking for.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#162413 Oct 7, 2012
Jedi Mind_Tricker wrote:
<quoted text>Gay's Law: Gays in a park scream, where are the children.
Allowing do/gay marriage will not stop gays from marrying.
So, how is gay marriage not a father/mother since gays having been marrying and becoming biological parents for centuries.
Yes, thanks for making our point, because the Supreme Court already riled that the ban on same sex marriage is supported by the 14th Amendment, not prohibited.
Game over.
Did you remove random words from your post? It makes no sense.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#162414 Oct 7, 2012
Jedi Mind_Tricker wrote:
<quoted text>That is what we have been telling you, homosexuality is not essential to human survival, in fact gays are counterproductive to survival of the species, and same sex marriage is not a fundamental right for people who choose to act on gay urges.
There always have been gay people, and there always will be. Humanity is surviving just fine. How are they counterproductive to human survival?

Marriage is a fundamental right. Why are you against equal rights?
FitterREPUBLICAN

Glendora, CA

#162415 Oct 7, 2012
President Obama visits Los Angeles, California for star-studded fundraiser concert tonight October 07, 2012.

Ther only republican you might see are the ones protesting or shouting nasty comments.
Ronald

Bellflower, CA

#162416 Oct 7, 2012
Once again, the nation's first African president is hobnobbing with his rich Hollywood "Liberal" pals for the purpose of collecting money for POLITICAL PURPOSES. In view of the dire economic condition the nation faces, shouldn't he be in Washington trying to fix the Obama economy?

Ronald

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#162417 Oct 7, 2012
Ronald wrote:
Once again, the nation's first African president
Why are you fundies such racists? Don't you believe god created us all?
(Didn't bother reading the rest of your post.)
NY4now

Corona, NY

#162418 Oct 7, 2012
WHY VOTE wrote:
Ok, I don't really care if same sex people get married or are together in any capacity. I am for equal rights BUT.......... I am very annoyed that peoples votes don't mean anything anymore. What happened to a majority vote rules? What happened to the peoples voice?
My stance on this has nothing to do with same sex couples. This is just the latest thing a court has overturned or blocked that THE PEOPLE voted for. Look at AZ., look back at prop. 187 which would have saved is billions in illegal immigrant funding. The people of the USA are trying to make changes to better our country and the few judges are effectively disenfranchising us.
Again this is not directed at same sex couples it is major frustration over the majority loosing there voice.
WHY VOTE????
Now stop and think about that for a minute...What do you suppose would have happened in the 60's/70's if we let the states vote on whether or not interracial marriage should be legal? Would it have been acceptable at that time, because you know there were a lot of bigots who would have said NO WAY!
Ronald

Bellflower, CA

#162419 Oct 7, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you fundies such racists? Don't you believe god created us all?
(Didn't bother reading the rest of your post.)
Rose_NoHo.

Yes. "Racist" is a vague political emotionalism of no fixed defined meaning. It is similar to the invented emotionalism "Homophobe". The purpose of emotionalisms of like kind is to move the political debate ever leftward in order to achieve revolutionary objectives.

Ronald

jacques renault

Chicago, IL

#162420 Oct 7, 2012
NY4now wrote:
<quoted text>
Now stop and think about that for a minute...What do you suppose would have happened in the 60's/70's if we let the states vote on whether or not interracial marriage should be legal? Would it have been acceptable at that time, because you know there were a lot of bigots who would have said NO WAY!
I need to stop you right there, you homosexual.

The majority of states allowed blacks and whites to marry before Loving.

In fact the state that was the defendant in Loving allowed all races to marry with one exception, being of course blacks could not marry whites.

You've already been humiliated: to top it off, the very same Supreme Court laughed you homosexuals out of court in Baker v Nelson, and reportedly (if Bob Woodward is to be believed) Thurgood Marshall, THE Civil Rights attorney, fell off his chair.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
where can I find heroin in monterey? (Oct '14) Fri FordEracing123 85
Where can I find legit black in Salinas asap!? Nov 27 Cjay22 8
News A cold case revisited: The night Dolly Evans di... Nov 21 HD vacaville 2
News Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) Nov 16 Helen Banks Curry 1,549
News Marina mayora s race: Incumbent Bruce Delgado v... Nov '16 Seattle Doug 1
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Oct '16 Agnostic 72,043
News Editorial: Yes on Measure E Oct '16 Kelly Sorenson 1

Monterey Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Monterey Mortgages