You couldn't be more wrong. You demonstrate your utter ignorance with your accountability statement. You see, industry is accountable every single day. If they don't live up to expectations, well they go out of business.
Sure sure. Remember the 'tobacco scientists'. I suppose you think that they were 'government toadies'. The FACTS are that they were INDUSTRY scientists and exposed as frauds as soon as the independent scientists, funded at arms length by government, were able to do some studies.
Corporate scientists are dependent on the corporation and slant their studies to promote the ones that 'sell the corporate line' or improve sales to the unsuspecting public.
This level of complete stupidity on your part just strips any credibility you MIGHT have had.
In other words, for the brainless morons out there, they are held accountable.
Only when the independent scientists, funded by various third parties, can get the money to prove that they are slanting their research. OPEN science, funded at arms length, gives you balanced facts. PRIVATE science, funded by the wealthy, gives you distorted science. As their motive is profits. Look at the fundamental biases in pharmaceutical research. ONLY the 'positive studies' get by management. And the result has been health risks for the public from CORPORATION researchers.
I cannot fathom how you got this delusional.
But government and its paid shills. Well, it can't be that they're wrong. They will just raise taxes and throw more money at it.
I cannot answer for government. It is NOT science. And just like corporations, they are slanting things towards THEIR bottom line (elections and kickbacks).
Which is why the PUBLIC must demand a 'carbon surcharge' to put market forces to work on the serious problem, while preventing any 'private profiteering' by the elected representatives.
See the latest "forecast" about the hurricane season. In an effort to bolster the rabid claims of antropoglobalclmategenicwarmin gchange hoaxers, they spewed out a forecast of heavy activity..
But the 'known factors' for hurricane activity ARE as stated and the forecast is based on REAL WORLD data. That there isn't YET a major storm season
1: Doesn't mean there won't be by the end.
2: Is part and parcel of year to year variability. We don't know EVERYTHING about it, yet. But Science is the way to find OUT about it.
3: Claiming that the forecast is an example of scientists distorting the facts is just stupid. They LOSE by making invalid 'forecasts' no matter WHO funds them. And make their careers if they can find out WHY it was delayed or milder this year. That is what drives SCIENCE.
These are the same people who want us to believe their idiocy about "Off the chart" temperatures in 2047.
There is a LOT less uncertainty about AGW trends than there is about storm activity. Nobody will claim that hurricane prediction is 'a theory' but AGW is.
The pathetic fools can't even forecast 6 months of tropical activity. Yeah. Accountability. I am amazed every day at the gullibility of some really ignorant people.
Your stupidity grows with each post. Why not quit while a few people not know?