|
“Drinks well with others”
Since: Sep 12
Canarsie, NY
|
Please wait...
Big D wrote: <quoted text> already covered that Liar Mike, You were unable to contradict a single thing I said, and was unable to substantiate your lying about what I say, or is it Harper Mike now, you call others for what you do yourself so often one has to keep up Sure I did. You said Clinton's impeachment failed. I proved you wrong. Now you're mad and lying about it.
|
|
Since: Nov 12
Wilton, CA
|
Please wait...
Mr Anderson wrote: <quoted text> Im glad they extended unemployment insurance as well... you need that !! Do you think that will be the answer andy? Actually I personally don't need that, I agree some need that. I only have one ranch worker here. By doing that, what does it say about our economy?
|
|
“Drinks well with others”
Since: Sep 12
Canarsie, NY
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
RiccardoFire wrote: <quoted text>The economy will recover on it's own in a matter of time, the argument is will more and more Gov. spending and giving tax breaks to hollywood and electric bikes help or hurt the comeback? Will increasing the debt another 4 trillion be worth it? Nope.
|
|
Big D
Modesto, CA
|
Mike DiRucci wrote: <quoted text> Sure I did. You said Clinton's impeachment failed. I proved you wrong. Now you're mad and lying about it. Here you go Liar Yes Clinton was impeached by a partisan vote in the house on Dec 18 1998 Yes the impeachment trial was voted upon in the senate, and failed by partisan vote on Feb 12 1999, and Clinton was acquitted. Yes the Articles of impeachment specifically stated the penalty was removal from office. Yes the impeachment failed in its every intent and goal as stated in the articles of impeachment Yes he was impeached, yes the impeachment ended in total failure at achieve any of its stated goals.
|
|
Since: Nov 12
Wilton, CA
|
Please wait...
Mike DiRucci wrote: <quoted text> He probably made it up. Mr. Anderson lies like a rug! Worse even than Big D! He lies more then dopey, He never has a link to back up his day dreams.
|
|
Largelanguage
Wrexham, UK
|
Mr Anderson wrote: <quoted text> hey box of rocks.... hostess is still making twinkies... like i said, you should move to the US and become a tea bagger. you are a far right wing fool, who doesnt listen to facts.... hostess just fired their union?? remember the air traffic controllers strike in 82"?? kinda like that. hostess is as important as that!!(sarc) so they will be around forevah!!! But she was considering opting out of business, she may even try now fool.
|
|
Mr Anderson
Anderson, CA
|
Largelanguage wrote: <quoted text> But she was considering opting out of business, she may even try now fool. the brands will remain.......and "she", who ever that is, will retire with more money than she "needs"
|
|
“Drinks well with others”
Since: Sep 12
Canarsie, NY
|
Please wait...
Big D wrote: <quoted text> Here you go Liar Yes Clinton was impeached by a partisan vote in the house on Dec 18 1998 Yes the impeachment trial was voted upon in the senate, and failed by partisan vote on Feb 12 1999, and Clinton was acquitted. Yes the Articles of impeachment specifically stated the penalty was removal from office. Yes the impeachment failed in its every intent and goal as stated in the articles of impeachment Yes he was impeached, yes the impeachment ended in total failure at achieve any of its stated goals. You are wrong. The impeachment did not fail in the Senate. The House has that sole power. You have changed your tune from "Clinton's impeachment failed" to "The intent and goals failed" Very dishonest and cowardly, you're not fooling anyone. Admit you were wrong and move on. Clinton was impeached. It did not fail.
|
|
|
|
Mr Anderson
Anderson, CA
|
RiccardoFire wrote: <quoted text>The economy will recover on it's own in a matter of time, the argument is will more and more Gov. spending and giving tax breaks to hollywood and electric bikes help or hurt the comeback? Will increasing the debt another 4 trillion be worth it? if you followed the news?? you know that spending is and tax reform are on the agenda for both parties this year. but the fiscal cliff was the start of those series of events, including the debt celing discussion. which BTW should be dealt with by itself. most spending needs reform. but will you even TALK about putting defence on the chopping block, before medicare?? because we obviousy have enough of an edge, on the rest of the world, militarily. in fact we out spend all the other(second teir) major powers combined. if you cant cut defence before hurting the middle class directly? than I cant take you seriously about the debt. you guys wanted reform, Obama made you take some(billy bob) medicine, and now your crying like a baby thak.
|
|
Mr Anderson
Anderson, CA
|
Mike DiRucci wrote: <quoted text> You are wrong. The impeachment did not fail in the Senate. The House has that sole power. You have changed your tune from "Clinton's impeachment failed" to "The intent and goals failed" Very dishonest and cowardly, you're not fooling anyone. Admit you were wrong and move on. Clinton was impeached. It did not fail. if you were a record player??? youd be skipping.
|
|
Mr Anderson
Anderson, CA
|
RiccardoFire wrote: <quoted text>Do you think that will be the answer andy? Actually I personally don't need that, I agree some need that. I only have one ranch worker here. By doing that, what does it say about our economy? you need socialism far more than I do.... especially if you are in business..
|
|
Mr Anderson
Anderson, CA
|
please try to remember, you right wing rethuglicans.... i can not hold your hand when it comes to real world knowledge...
you will have to leave your comfy news bubble and venture out into the real world.
no holding hands with MR Anderson
|
|
Big D
Modesto, CA
|
Mike DiRucci wrote: <quoted text> You are wrong. The impeachment did not fail in the Senate. The House has that sole power. You have changed your tune from "Clinton's impeachment failed" to "The intent and goals failed" Very dishonest and cowardly, you're not fooling anyone. Admit you were wrong and move on. Clinton was impeached. It did not fail. Here you go Liar Yes Clinton was impeached by a partisan vote in the house on Dec 18 1998 Yes the impeachment trial was voted upon in the senate, and failed by partisan vote on Feb 12 1999, and Clinton was acquitted. Yes the Articles of impeachment specifically stated the penalty was removal from office. Yes the impeachment failed in its every intent and goal as stated in the articles of impeachment Yes he was impeached, yes the impeachment ended in total failure at achieve any of its stated goals.
|
|
“Drinks well with others”
Since: Sep 12
Canarsie, NY
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
1
Mr Anderson wrote: <quoted text> if you were a record player??? youd be skipping. If you had a brain, you'd be dangerous! As it is you're just funny. Or else I'd totally ignore your dumbass! Too bad you don't pay any taxes, they are going up soon on EVERYBODY who pays them.
|
|
“Drinks well with others”
Since: Sep 12
Canarsie, NY
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
Big D wrote: <quoted text> Here you go Liar Yes Clinton was impeached by a partisan vote in the house on Dec 18 1998 Yes the impeachment trial was voted upon in the senate, and failed by partisan vote on Feb 12 1999, and Clinton was acquitted. Yes the Articles of impeachment specifically stated the penalty was removal from office. Yes the impeachment failed in its every intent and goal as stated in the articles of impeachment Yes he was impeached, yes the impeachment ended in total failure at achieve any of its stated goals. You are a liar. You changed your tune from "the impeachment failed" to "the intent and goals failed". You're not fooling anyone.
|
|
Big D
Modesto, CA
|
Mike DiRucci wrote: <quoted text> If you had a brain, you'd be dangerous! As it is you're just funny. Or else I'd totally ignore your dumbass! Too bad you don't pay any taxes, they are going up soon on EVERYBODY who pays them. Yes the republicans made sure of that didn’t they. They set the deadline on when that would expire. I don’t fault them for that, but you might. Personally I think we might have been better off in the long term if we had just gone over the cliff.
|
|
Big D
Modesto, CA
|
Mike DiRucci wrote: <quoted text> You are a liar. You changed your tune from "the impeachment failed" to "the intent and goals failed". You're not fooling anyone. Here you go Liar Yes Clinton was impeached by a partisan vote in the house on Dec 18 1998 Yes the impeachment trial was voted upon in the senate, and failed by partisan vote on Feb 12 1999, and Clinton was acquitted. Yes the Articles of impeachment specifically stated the penalty was removal from office. Yes the impeachment failed in its every intent and goal as stated in the articles of impeachment Yes he was impeached, yes the impeachment ended in total failure at achieve any of its stated goals.
|
|
“Drinks well with others”
Since: Sep 12
Canarsie, NY
|
Please wait...
Big D wrote: <quoted text> Here you go Liar Yes Clinton was impeached by a partisan vote in the house on Dec 18 1998 Yes the impeachment trial was voted upon in the senate, and failed by partisan vote on Feb 12 1999, and Clinton was acquitted. Yes the Articles of impeachment specifically stated the penalty was removal from office. Yes the impeachment failed in its every intent and goal as stated in the articles of impeachment Yes he was impeached, yes the impeachment ended in total failure at achieve any of its stated goals. You have dishonestly changed your original assertion that "Clinton's impeachment failed" to avoid embarrassment at having your ass handed to you. You're not fooling anyone. And then you falsely accuse me of lying, when you are the liar.
|
|
“Drinks well with others”
Since: Sep 12
Canarsie, NY
|
Please wait...
Big D wrote: <quoted text> Yes the republicans made sure of that didn’t they. They set the deadline on when that would expire. I don’t fault them for that, but you might. Personally I think we might have been better off in the long term if we had just gone over the cliff. After vilifying the Bush tax cuts for years, Obama now insists we need them! Priceless!
|
|
Since: Nov 12
Wilton, CA
|
Please wait...
Mr Anderson wrote: <quoted text> the brands will remain.......and "she", who ever that is, will retire with more money than she "needs" in other words, a successful person should be punished, take her money don't allow her to buy expensive things and donate her money to good causes...lol
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|