Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
Mr Anderson

Anderson, CA

#3796 Nov 29, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>What is the point? The people on welfare voted for a raise. game over. Anyone working will pay more, will pay more taxes for obamaCare. Five More Obamacare Taxes Starting January 1, 2013
The Obamacare Medical Device Tax

a $20 billion tax increase:
Medical device manufacturersemploy 409,000 people in 12,000 plants across the country. Obamacare imposes a new 2.3 percentexcise tax on gross sales

even if the company does not earn a profit in a given year. In addition tokilling small business jobs and impacting research and development budgets, this will increase thecost of your health care

making everything from pacemakers to prosthetics more expensive
The
Obamacare “Special Needs Kids Tax”–
a $13 billion tax increase:
The 30-35 million
Americans who use a Flexible Spending Account (FSA) at work to pay for their family’s basic
medical needs will face a new government cap of $2,500 (currently the accounts are unlimitedunder federal law, though employers are allowed to set a cap)
The Obamacare Surtax on Investment Income

a $123 billion tax increase
The Obamacare Medicare Payroll Tax Hike -- an $86.8 billion tax increase
well go figure.

60% of americans agree the wealthy should pay a few points more of their income for the common good.
...... you dont even know what common good is.

riccardo?? which economic group is it?? that votes the least??

Ill give you a hint....it isnt the rich.

to suggest that Obama was re-elected by welfare recipients is looooony....

he was re-elected for what i keep TELLING you he was re-uped for...

the tax cut.....

people want their tax cut.

romney shoulda said something about that...

I think voters automatically are hip to the fact that rethugs want tax cuts primarily for the welathy.

all a voter had to do was see the comparative pies that were being awarded by the bush tax cuts to realize that your party represents the wealthy.....primarily....

it is time for your paryy to reach out to the less fortunate and the minorities if they want to have a chance of being relevant for long.

you guys also need a divorce from the evangelical wing of your party.

they want to elect someone like mike wackabee or reich santorum..

candidates from the far reich(for the far religious reich) who would lose a general election badly.

not just badly?? but MUCH worse than Mitt romney lost..

we would be talking about a popular vote landslide.
Mr Anderson

Anderson, CA

#3797 Nov 29, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
This is a Democrats dream come true, starting Jan 1st. New and higher taxes for all. Well almost all, excluding the 47 percent who pay none
hey genius....

if the tax rates go back to clinton era rates??

then low income people who were paying SOMETHING then....will be paying something once again.

the idea is to keep in place the Obama/Bush tax cuts......
JUST FOR THE 98%.

and let the top two go back to paying what they were paying in the 90's...

it isnt really that unfair?? is it??

federal tax rates will remain low on the middle class if congress can agree to giving the middle class a tax cut, without soaking the wealthy....

because we need to pay down the debt.

how can you fools talk outof both sides of your mouths like that...

your teatarded slogan is??

"protect the rich!!! but balance the budget on the backs of the middle class"

how about we balance the budget on th backs of the wealthy and

stimulate the ecomony with tax cut for the middle class??

or is that to socialist for you??

the wealthy will still end up with most of the money....

that is the nature of capitalism.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#3798 Nov 29, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
well go figure.
60% of americans agree the wealthy should pay a few points more of their income for the common good.
......
lol...60%? where did you come up with that figure? Are you making up stuff again? Common good = Marxism

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#3799 Nov 29, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>

because we need to pay down the debt.
I'm talking about the new ObamaCare taxes moron. Obama is not concerned about paying back the debt. lol...keep posting, are you stoned this early?

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#3800 Nov 29, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
you guys also need a divorce from the evangelical wing of your party.
they want to elect someone like mike wackabee or reich santorum..
candidates from the far reich(for the far religious reich) who would lose a general election badly.
It would be terrible to elect someone that believes in God. lol..

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#3801 Nov 29, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
well go figure.
60% of americans agree the wealthy should pay a few points more of their income for the common good.
...... you dont even know what common good is.
Why just tax the rich? Let’s string them up. Bring on the pitchforks, nooses and torches. If you are going to wage a class warfare stop pussyfooting around with the tax code and commit. This debate is tiresome.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#3802 Nov 29, 2012
Two-thirds of millionaires left Britain to avoid 50p tax rate
Almost two-thirds of the country’s million-pound earners disappeared from Britain after the introduction of the 50p top rate of tax, figures have disclosed.

Let's either hang them or get them out of this country!

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#3803 Nov 29, 2012
You know, Obama is one of “The Rich” himself! And since he is, perhaps he can set a good example for all the rest of The Rich by immediately turning over 90% of his assets to the Federal Government and foregoing any salary, since he is “The Rich.”

Also, since Obama is one of “The Rich” and a multimillionaire, he can immediately start to fund his ultra-extravagant lifestyle from his own pocket, footing the bill for all of his own parties and vacations, including the FULL cost of the extraordinary amount of travel enjoyed by him and his family.

Until he does this, his words are nothing more than the howls of a communist agitator.
Mr Anderson

Anderson, CA

#3804 Nov 29, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>lol...60%? where did you come up with that figure? Are you making up stuff again? Common good = Marxism
the common good = all the money spent during thre progressive era(with that socialist progressive taxation in place)

to make your life here in california better.

I know you hate the common good and the common man.

you never speak in favor of the working class....

it is always mooochers this and marxist that.....

you dont even have a clue what real a real marxist system looks like....

it surely doesnt resemble the corporatocracy we have here.

you must have missed the cold war...

what makes you so pathetically out of touch??

is the socialism you decry is all around you, and you uase it constantly.

and weve had that system of progressive taxation and wealth redistribution for three quarters of a century....

it is time to get used to it!!

pull your head out of the sands of non-reality...
Mr Anderson

Anderson, CA

#3805 Nov 29, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
Two-thirds of millionaires left Britain to avoid 50p tax rate
Almost two-thirds of the country’s million-pound earners disappeared from Britain after the introduction of the 50p top rate of tax, figures have disclosed.
Let's either hang them or get them out of this country!
just makin more stuff up huh??

why is it once I start writing MORE??

you always start writting less.

it is because you have nothing to say but exhausted talking points!!>

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#3806 Nov 29, 2012
lol....like I said where did u come up with the 60% figure? Lesson in debating = stop making up BS.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#3807 Nov 29, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
just makin more stuff up huh??
why is it once I start writing MORE??
you always start writting less.
it is because you have nothing to say but exhausted talking points!!>
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new s/politics/9707029/Two-thirds- of-millionaires-left-Britain-t o-avoid-50p-tax-rate.html

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#3808 Nov 29, 2012
Mr Anderson

Anderson, CA

#3809 Nov 29, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
You know, Obama is one of “The Rich” himself! And since he is, perhaps he can set a good example for all the rest of The Rich by immediately turning over 90% of his assets to the Federal Government and foregoing any salary, since he is “The Rich.”
Also, since Obama is one of “The Rich” and a multimillionaire, he can immediately start to fund his ultra-extravagant lifestyle from his own pocket, footing the bill for all of his own parties and vacations, including the FULL cost of the extraordinary amount of travel enjoyed by him and his family.
Until he does this, his words are nothing more than the howls of a communist agitator.
you are the agitator.

the "rich" pay an average of half of the prescribed rate, which is 33%.

16.5 %.....exactly what warren buffet claimed he paid...

your 90% figure is thing of the past(eisenhower, that commy)......and even then it was half that in reality.

but those are the crucial funds that paid for you and I to be able to drive from state to state.....

you like that right??

ps: did you know eisenhower AND general macarthur both opposed trumans plans to nook japan??

pps: Obama already said about one thousand times, on the stump, he wants to pay more.

how could he have a campaign like that? and NOT say that constantly...

I swear I hafta hold yer hand when it comes to basic political stuff....

sad.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#3810 Nov 29, 2012
I didn't make it up, it's a fact. Almost two-thirds of the country’s million-pound earners disappeared from Britain after the introduction of the 50p top rate of tax, figures have disclosed. Like I said, as long as we are on the class war path, let's lock them up, hang them on trees for all the poor people to spit on them. Go Great Oblama, true change! Let's all make equal pay, make it fair for everyone.....lol...great idea karl?

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#3811 Nov 29, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
you are the agitator.
the "rich" pay an average of half of the prescribed rate, which is 33%.
16.5 %.....exactly what warren buffet claimed he paid...
your 90% figure is thing of the past(eisenhower, that commy)......and even then it was half that in reality.
but those are the crucial funds that paid for you and I to be able to drive from state to state.....
you like that right??
ps: did you know eisenhower AND general macarthur both opposed trumans plans to nook japan??
pps: Obama already said about one thousand times, on the stump, he wants to pay more.
how could he have a campaign like that? and NOT say that constantly...
I swear I hafta hold yer hand when it comes to basic political stuff....
sad.
Warren Buffett is free to send all his extra money to the US Treasury, why hasn't he?
Mr Anderson

Anderson, CA

#3812 Nov 29, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
lol....like I said where did u come up with the 60% figure? Lesson in debating = stop making up BS.
im not making that up....
i saw it last night... and the night before, and the night before

but YOU wll have to do your own opinion poll homework....

as I said I cant hold your hand in these discusssions.... if you dont accept any information, but that which is spoon fed to you by faux news....

these are mainstream polls from the mainstream media im quoting.

google them....!!!

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#3813 Nov 29, 2012
lol..now u want to talk about nuking japan. Your mind floats around anderson. Kind of seems like you are on pot?

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#3814 Nov 29, 2012
Plus Buffett should be in jail for his inside trading and manipulation of the stock market. He is a fraud. Mr. Buffett says he pays less in taxes than 20 others who work for him so, therefore, taxes must be too low. While his statements, on their face, may be true, he is not telling the entire story. As Forbes pointed out, Mr. Buffett donates his stock, which costs him little-to-nothing, to charity once it has risen in value and takes the tax right offs thus lowering his tax burden. This is a very different method of paying less than your “fair share” on income tax because you are using the charitable donation to essentially shelter your assets making it appear you earn less than you do.

Romney had a good idea to lesson these loopholes that the rich use. Mr. Buffett says he pays less in taxes than 20 others who work for him so, therefore, taxes must be too low. While his statements, on their face, may be true, he is not telling the entire story. As Forbes pointed out, Mr. Buffett donates his stock, which costs him little-to-nothing, to charity once it has risen in value and takes the tax right offs thus lowering his tax burden. This is a very different method of paying less than your “fair share” on income tax because you are using the charitable donation to essentially shelter your assets making it appear you earn less than you do.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

#3815 Nov 29, 2012
When Liberals read that Mr. Buffett says taxes should be raised they shout it from the highest mountaintop as if it were some kind of universal truth but that’s only because they don’t want to see the size of Government decrease.

Liberals like to say that the Tea Party caused America’s credit rating to decrease. There is no evidence of this from Standard & Poor. And Liberals also say that there was no compromise in the recent raising of the debt ceiling. Considering Democrats control the Executive Branch and 50% of Congress any bill which becomes law has to, by its very nature, be a compromise.

And even if the Tea Party had a mind control machine… why didn’t Democrats raise the debt ceiling when they controled 66% of the Federal Government?

The logic of the Left is not only faulty but it’s shameful that, with few facts to back their assertions up, Liberals rely on the old moral imperative argument.

This tactic has been used repeatedly by Liberals when they are short on facts. Fighting Global Warming is a moral imperative! Let me just get out my checkbook! Wasting hundreds of billions of dollars on money losing solar panels and wind farms which chop up birds is a moral imperative! How dare you question us sending your tax dollars to build more of these silly machines!

I am not necessarily against raising taxes (or closing those “loopholes”) but I view it as trying to bail water out of a boat with a screen door for a hull.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Jul 22 dGo mneDad lyHo i... 71,943
News Del Rey Oaks Garden Center grand opening schedu... Jul 21 Kathi Buckley Smith 1
drugs Jul 16 JayJay 2
News Sex offender Tom Pollacci pleads not guilty to ... (Mar '09) Jul 15 martin5 360
City of seaside needs to replace more than PD T... Jul 10 fed up 1
Monterey Seafood Restaurant Celebrates its 26 Y... Jul 6 cafefina58 1
News Carmel waste broker accused of bribery (Dec '08) Jun '15 ChaCha 17
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Monterey Mortgages