RiccardoFire

Elk Grove, CA

#2928 Nov 10, 2012
droneclone wrote:
<quoted text>
so im glad you listed the democrats who ageed with that faulty inteelligence...
How do you know it was faulty? I remember Hillary saying she has seen photos of wmd's in Iraq...we gave them so much warning, they had time to move them or destroy them.
RiccardoFire

Elk Grove, CA

#2929 Nov 10, 2012
Barack Hussain chomsky wrote:
ROCKHARDO?? it is hard to tack to the left of me, because Im a lefty....and because youve relished in the A-bombing of Japan.!!!
who knows?? mabey all gore would have gone to war in afghnaistan?? as sort of a knee"jerk" reaction to 9/11??
but I really doubt he would have invaded iraq...
that was real streatch, the way the Neo cons put that one together....
gore isnt part and parcel of the texas energy cartel.
you wouldnt believe the orginal reason for invading afghanistan?? but it is true..
bush cheney rumsy and wolfy all wanted to build a pipeline across afghanistan to the exploding indian market.....not kidding.
there is LOTS of oil in central asia, where we have strong allies.
trillions and trillions of dollars worth.
not to mention the minerals in afghanistan?? one trillion more.
certainly it is conveinient for either administration to keep the Us in afghanistan, just for the POPPY crop they sell off to pay for covert activities...
that was REALLY funny when you said carter was with the sandanistas....
it made me realize you have no grasp on foriegn affairs at all!!
just the fact that you whine about the debt after Bush spent 3 trillion on foriegn adventures in Iraq and afghanistan?? descredits you on any fiscal debate!!........
you cant come to grips with the fact that it was YOUR party that started those wars.
the most powerful country in the world also HAS TO BE the most judicious when they are attacked from a nationless force....
otherwise the end effect is what we saw at the end of the Bush tenure.
a much less stable world(with foriegn terror attacks greatly multiplied from the 90's).... and its number one terrorist still on the loose...
then you guys crashed the economy!!
with help again from bill clinton and newt!!
so now??
say it again, even though the demmy's are perfect//
bad rethugs!!! NO whitehouse.
What?
Barack Hussain chomsky

Anderson, CA

#2930 Nov 10, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>What?
what??

what dont you understand??
Barack Hussain chomsky

Anderson, CA

#2931 Nov 10, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>How do you know it was faulty? I remember Hillary saying she has seen photos of wmd's in Iraq...we gave them so much warning, they had time to move them or destroy them.
how could we really know, indeed.??

what is important is the appropriate response....

im with you....I think more countries having WMD is a bad thing.

but consider the israeli response in 81', which was to disable their nuclear capacities by air.....instead of blundering into a ground war.

the aimes of invasion are ALWAYS to insure access to resources.....when other aims such as disabling their military, only requires airpower.

that is why we all knew Bush was full of s&&t when he told the world he needed to invade an entire nation, just to make sure they didnt keep developing the bomb!! talk about obvious overkill??
im suprised you had such a hard on for that war...(No im not)

ps; for instance?? to disable Irans nuclear capabilities?? would we have to invade???

you can see why that would be stooopid right??

Since: Aug 11

Santa Cruz, CA

#2932 Nov 10, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>You seem very unclear. Our intention is to not have any soldier die. Why are you comparing a soldier dying to an Ambassador dying? The investigation is a sitting President covering it up. Why do you liberals always resort back to Bush? When will Obama be accountable?
If you didn't want soldiers to die, you wouldn't send them into combat irresponsibly.

It's exactly the same thing. An ambasador taking a job in a violently unstable country knows the risks of being in harms way just the same as a soldier.

I don't care. This is nothing but another red herring issue.

Liberals. STFU I don't care about that drool.
Peddlers

Covina, CA

#2933 Nov 10, 2012
Never take time to read, just peddle over it then move on.
Barack Hussain chomsky

Anderson, CA

#2934 Nov 10, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>So the R's are bad and the D's are good....that's the kind of thought that has this country so divided because of brain washed idiots like You!
quit trying to trivialize the election results...

we won!! YOU lost!!

and you not only lost??

you lost big!!

and blew the senate for fourth straight election because of teatared incompetance..
RollingCA

Covina, CA

#2935 Nov 10, 2012
But California is where the Republicans are walking zombies.

Republican National Committee member Shawn Steel has been pushing the party to become more aggressive about recruiting Asians all over the USA..
RiccardoFire

Elk Grove, CA

#2936 Nov 10, 2012
Barack Hussain chomsky wrote:
<quoted text>
what??
what dont you understand??
Read your post, you babble and then ask a question. You ask about 10 questions. Do you want that kind of response?
RiccardoFire

Elk Grove, CA

#2937 Nov 10, 2012
Barack Hussain chomsky wrote:
<quoted text>
quit trying to trivialize the election results...
we won!! YOU lost!!
and you not only lost??
you lost big!!
and blew the senate for fourth straight election because of teatared incompetance..
Is that what you want? 2 sides? I didn't lose anything personally. I live in California, My vote doesn't matter.
RiccardoFire

Elk Grove, CA

#2938 Nov 10, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
If you didn't want soldiers to die, you wouldn't send them into combat irresponsibly.
It's exactly the same thing. An ambasador taking a job in a violently unstable country knows the risks of being in harms way just the same as a soldier.
I don't care. This is nothing but another red herring issue.
Liberals. STFU I don't care about that drool.
We have not had an Ambassador die since 1979. What are you talking about? The problem was BO lying to the sheep. The cover up, like fast and furious. Why do u think the story came out after the election about our CIA director? Now he can't testify, he was the main witness. Stupid you.
RiccardoSucks

Elk Grove, CA

#2939 Nov 10, 2012
Don't you love the delusional wet dreams of RiccardoWacko! No evidence at all that Petraeus's resignation has anything to do with Benghazi but Ricky immediately spring a boner, pulled out his little Tea Bagger weenie and starting spanking his little monkey over his newly perceived scandal! LOL
Barack Hussain chomsky

Anderson, CA

#2940 Nov 10, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Is that what you want? 2 sides? I didn't lose anything personally. I live in California, My vote doesn't matter.
if your party doesnt moderate its veiws?... they can COUNT on losing election after national election!!
Barack Hussain chomsky

Anderson, CA

#2941 Nov 10, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Read your post, you babble and then ask a question. You ask about 10 questions. Do you want that kind of response?
well yes!! I do??!!

you are alweays so short on policy details?? and long winded on talking points....especially on benghazi!

was petreus's affair really fake??

because that broad aint bad lookin.
RiccardoFire

Elk Grove, CA

#2942 Nov 11, 2012
Israel says further attacks from Syria will "elicit a vigorous response" from IDF, sends letter to UN warning Syrians to avoid spillover; Incident marks first time IDF has fired at Syria since 1973 Yom Kippur War.
Thank you Obama.
RiccardoFire

Elk Grove, CA

#2943 Nov 11, 2012
Barack Hussain chomsky wrote:
<quoted text>
well yes!! I do??!!
you are alweays so short on policy details?? and long winded on talking points....especially on benghazi!
was petreus's affair really fake??
because that broad aint bad lookin.
Thx you, at least you are honest: Never said it was fake. Did you see photos of his wife and then his gf? What would you do if you were straight? They had to find a way to get him out of testifying. They dug and it wasn't so deep. He should have to testify no matter what. If I had to testify about my work, can I just resign and get out of it?
RiccardoFire

Elk Grove, CA

#2944 Nov 11, 2012
Barack Hussain chomsky wrote:
<quoted text>
if your party doesnt moderate its veiws?... they can COUNT on losing election after national election!!
I don't think views matter, it comes down to a popularity contest.
RiccardoFire

Elk Grove, CA

#2945 Nov 11, 2012
RiccardoSucks wrote:
Don't you love the delusional wet dreams of RiccardoWacko! No evidence at all that Petraeus's resignation has anything to do with Benghazi but Ricky immediately spring a boner, pulled out his little Tea Bagger weenie and starting spanking his little monkey over his newly perceived scandal! LOL
It's real simple genious: He was the main witness and was going to testify. Now he doesn't have to testify. It's almost like figuring out what 1 plus 1 equals. Do you struggle trying to figure out things or just wait til Chris matthews says it? I know Chris got excited and made the comment he was glad for the storm, did you enjoy it too? I'm sure gore enjoyed it too. Why are you so vulgar? I appreciate Anderson, at least he doesn't stoop to your level.
RiccardoFire

Elk Grove, CA

#2946 Nov 11, 2012
Cover-up? If it is discovered the Petraeus affair was kept quite so as to not disrupt Obama's Presidential campaign, Barack may face some tough questioning.
Rethumpedlicans

Anderson, CA

#2947 Nov 11, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>I don't think views matter, it comes down to a popularity contest.
everything is black and white!! cut and dried... with you.

the candidates spent billions on this election why??

just to show people how pretty they are?? and that they can talk??
policy is pretty important.

the electorate got a veiw of how romney was talking in the primaries vs how he was presenting that same case in the fall..

the two sides of romney, just didnt jibe....

but his defeat went deeper than that...

when i say war on women??/ it is not just some abstract claim(like you guys often like to do)

there have been 1100 plus bills proposed at the state level9in tea partier states), seriously restricting womens health care.

we didint even need the democratsd to motivate the latino vote.

your party did it for us by trying to push these voter supression measures.... they obviously backfired!

and then there was the tea party led effort to crush the unions...

I got news!! people like their unions.....kasich's union busting bill was rebuked by voter referendum by 2 to 1.

wisconsin has some of the same dynamic....

MITT NEEDED to win it the rust belt?? and that is just where your party has been trying to balance budgets on the backs of firefighters and teachers....

if it was a popularity contest?? romney would have won....

hes white and good looking...

but that doesnt mean squat if you can not provide details of your plans??

or if the candidate happens to tack back to the center suddenly during the first debate, confusing voters....

he didnt clarify things after he changed positions....which led me to believe he was like......vote for me?? im white and have the same plan he does!!

he just would NOT clarify his positions on any news show or commercial?? all the ads the romney campaign ran, muddied the waters in regerds to HIS positions......also, in a super pac ad? you found out Obama was lileky a communist...

... but at least Obama provided a few amore deatils of his plans, and had some numbers to run on.

the president stood there calling him OUT on HIS plan.....and he never really clarified it for us...

if it was a popularity contest?? obama's lucidy was much more popular and appreciated, especially in the foreign policy debate.....where the presdient cleary mooped the floor with romney.

romney thought he and his richest friends would try to buy the presidency.....and mitt got welcomed to prime-time??

.......and he definately wasnt ready for it!!

Just look at how "shellschocked" he was after the defeat???

that is what happens, when you surround yourself with YES men.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monterey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) 21 hr Woody 1,516
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Jan 22 JOEL 71,538
Multiple suspects in custody for Seaside shootings Jan 15 Anonymous 1
Peninsula high school students arrested in 'fig... (Sep '09) Jan 7 trey 108
Other border states shun Arizona's immigration law (May '10) Jan 6 colton case 9,053
Kristen Scannell Saratoga Springs NY Adds New H... Dec '14 Kristen Scannell ... 2
Carmel River diverted to allow dam removal, pre... Dec '14 Clint 1
Monterey Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Monterey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 12:48 am PST