Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 200,974

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#183954 Mar 20, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh Madone! Is it possible you could use your superior intellect and offer an opinion without invoking your distain for religion?
I believe it's sometimes necessary for one Christian to point out to another Christian that they have strayed from Christ's teachings. This is not disdain for religion. In fact it's the very opposite.

When I hear so-called Christians talk about the elimination of gays from the planet, I don't see them following Christ's teachings at all.

He spoke of loving your neighbor as you love yourself. He spoke of living among one another without judgment. He also said, "Blessed are they that suffer persecution for justice sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven."
Big D

Modesto, CA

#183955 Mar 20, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Doctors used to feel that same way about homosexuality.
I know they did, and I only talk like that to morons that still do
3up3dOWN

La Puente, CA

#183956 Mar 20, 2013
Three UP and three DOWN, now it's Rizzo's turn in the barrel.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183958 Mar 20, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Does that term confuse you?
No. And if you had any integrity, you would not have edited out this part of my post:
"What are you talking about?
I'm quite direct."

That shows the term does not confuse me.
And your post shows you are so desperate to "get" me, that you will resort to dishonesty.
LOLSER!

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183959 Mar 20, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Fourth, I have already noted before, a cure will likely come. The vast majority of people do not want their children born with defects.
Guess your parents didn't want you! LOL!
:)

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#183964 Mar 20, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Please, quote where I said any such thing.
Smirk.
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
"Fourth, I have already noted before, a cure will likely come. The vast majority of people do not want their children born with defects." (Sunday Mar 17)
You want a "cure" for gay people. Does that not mean that you want us eliminated from the planet?
Noting that science will 'likely' discover a cure, and Christians will avoid utilizing it, in your mind means I want gays eliminated from the planet???

Come on VV, that has to be embarrassing as hell stupid!

I'd admit you were full of it and just plain wrong, simply to pray for some measure of restored credibility.

Or do you want to dig the shit hole deeper?

Smile.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183965 Mar 20, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Please, quote where I said any such thing.
Smirk.
<quoted text>
Noting that science will 'likely' discover a cure, and Christians will avoid utilizing it, in your mind means I want gays eliminated from the planet???
Do you think they will find a cure for your defect?
Do you think you should have been aborted?
:)
Your parents didn't want you.:)

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#183966 Mar 20, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's my thoughts on the matter... I'm not sure our scientist or medical professionals have the capability of changing genetic or epigenetic related issues while a fetus is developing.
At best, they may be able to (in the future) determine if a fetus is gay while in the womb.
And if so-called Christian zealots, who want homosexuals eliminated from the planet, get their way, they will simply decide to abort the "damaged", "broken", "defective", "abominable" (these are the words they use to describe us) fetus that women may be carrying.
They compare us to pedophiles, murderers, rapists, etc.
And if you think for one minute that they wouldn't abort a fetus that might genetically be prone to pedophilia, murder, or rape, then you don't understand these so-called Christian fanatics.
Their goal is total elimination of homosexual and transgender people from the face of the planet at ANY COST.
That is a disgusting concept.
To eliminate a group of people who are totally functional; who work and contribute to society; who are capable of full and happy lives--to eliminate such a group from the planet simply because you might have a spiritual belief that runs counter to a minute--a miniscule aspect of their lives, is a disgusting and deplorable act.
That is what Hitler attempted to do. And anyone who believes that eliminating homosexuals from the planet will improve the quality of mankind is simply following the directions of a maniacal mass-murderer.
The interesting thing about this post, is that it is exactly the same distortion tactics Hitler used to discredit Jews and Christians like Deitrick Bonhoeffer.

The fact of the matter is that Christians are on the front lines against abortion for any reason. You know that VV, and instead, make a bold-faced lie about what Christians believe and what they would do.

The same thing you foolishly attempted to do with my words and actions.

Do you understand how evil this type of thing is? How your blind pursuit of justifying homosexual behavior has darkened and perverted your thinking and spirit in every way?

I'm scared for you.
Good Old Bill

Beacon, NY

#183967 Mar 20, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you think they will find a cure for your defect?
Do you think you should have been aborted?
:)
Your parents didn't want you.:)
I guess Rose,according to his train of thought and line of thinking his mom should have in fact aborted him? Makes one go Hmmmmmmm........?? LOL,Damn that boy is definitely a whacka doodle do!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183968 Mar 20, 2013
Some Never Came Home wrote:
<quoted text>
Dream on prick,When the Supreme court again overturns Doma
Seriously, you are in your own world aren't you?

"When the SCOTUS AGAIN" What do you mean again, the law has already been invalidated by the lower courts, the SCOTUS wouldn't be doing anything "again" they would simply be affirming the decision.

Oh, and I guess you missed the part where I explained to you not only that Section 3 of DOMA was UNCONSTITUTIONAL but why it was.

You should read slower, and perhaps more than once, it seems you are a bit slow.
Some Never Came Home wrote:
<quoted text>
and Prop 8 in June who cares what you think the azz will be in your hand not mine and it will be you eating the shyte!
Why don't you give than another try, perhaps ask someone for help?
Some Never Came Home wrote:
<quoted text>

I will take great pleasure in that Bigot boy!
Perhaps you would care to share a link to a single post where I presented myself as a bigot? Maybe you could use the one where I explained that DOMA was unconstitutional, or you could even use the one where I stated I had voted against propositions that would limit marriage to one man and one woman- TWICE.

You truly are an idiot.
Some Never Came Home wrote:
<quoted text>

Be careful I've seen you make mistakes all the time but I'm big enough to let them slide,on the other hand you continue to show what an A-hole you truly are!
Excellent, I will wait while you post one.
Some Never Came Home wrote:
<quoted text>
Now move along as I can plainly see what others think of you! LOL
Yeah, I should move on because idiots like Rose, Xbox, and you whom can't formulate a single coherent post don't like me.

You certainly do have delusions of grandeur.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183969 Mar 20, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The interesting thing about this post, is that it is exactly the same distortion tactics Hitler used to discredit Jews and Christians like Deitrick Bonhoeffer.
...
Godwin's Law.
You lose!
:)

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183970 Mar 20, 2013
Good Old Bill wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess Rose,according to his train of thought and line of thinking his mom should have in fact aborted him? Makes one go Hmmmmmmm........?? LOL,Damn that boy is definitely a whacka doodle do!
I'm pro-choice.:)

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183971 Mar 20, 2013
Apollo11911 wrote:
<quoted text>What will you say when DOMA
Can any of you read? I have already stated my position on DOMA.

One more time since you and your clan seem a bit slow- SEC 3 of DOMA is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

Got it?
Apollo11911 wrote:
, Prop 8
Prop 8 is a very distinct issue. CA is currently the only State where one can make the argument that the 14th Amendment has been violated. This is due to the fact that there are currently homosexuals in CA whom are legally marriage and will continue to be so even with prop 8. This creates a "special class" of homosexual citizen within the State- one class which can and is legally married, and another second class which cannot.

I fully expect the SCOTUS to uphold the Walker decision, I also fully expect them to limit that decision to the State of California. It is in fact the correct and Constitutional thing to do.
Apollo11911 wrote:
and other state wide bans against same sex marriage are struck down by SCOTUS?? Will you then agree with the law, or demand a new ruling?
Now this is a wide net. There is no enumerated power within the Constitution for the Federal Government to regulate or otherwise define marriage, thus under the 10th Amendment this falls to the State. This is the exact logic the court used when it ruled DOMA unconstitutional. I feel the court won't touch the issue of same sex marriage on a national level.

Here is what I think will come out of the SCOTUS with these cases, and what also would be the Constitutional thing for the court to do.

First- Rule that Prop 8 is a violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment for the reasons I stated above. They will limit this ruling strictly to California and the Prop 8 Issue.

Second- They will Rule that Section 3 of DOMA is unconstitutional for the same reasons as the lower court ruling- The Federal Government Lack's the enumerated power to define or regulate marriage- thus this power lies with the States to define and choose on their own. This will serve a dual purpose:
1) It will prevent the Federal Government from limiting, removing, or denying equal rights to homosexual couples whom are legally married by a State which allows such unions. They will be required to treat them exactly the same in regards to all regulations, benefits, and tax laws.
2) It will leave the States free to decide on their own what constitutes a marriage within their own boarders, as it should be based on the 9th and 10th Amendments of the Constitution. Now I really don't think it's going to be long before all State legalize same sex marriage, public opinion is moving in that direction, and most people really don't care. But based on our founding as a republic and union of individual sovereign State's, it is up to each to decide.

Now you may not like that, and that may not even be the way the SCOTUS rules, as just like the entire Federal Government they are in a power grab, and if they can find a way to give the Federal Government purview over the regulation and control of marriage they most certainly will. But you should ask yourself, is the the "freedom" you are looking for?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183972 Mar 20, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
No. And if you had any integrity, you would not have edited out this part of my post:
I edited out the part of your post that was irrelevant, I damn near had to delete the whole thing!!!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183973 Mar 20, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm pro-choice.:)
Too bad your parents weren't huh?
Bernard

Oklahoma City, OK

#183974 Mar 20, 2013
Peer reviewed studies have concluded the typical male queer consumes 22.46 lbs of fecal matter on an annual basis.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183975 Mar 20, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Too bad your parents weren't huh?
They were.
They chose to have me.

Too bad the attempt to abort you didn't succeed, and just left you seriously brain damaged.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183976 Mar 20, 2013
Bernard wrote:
Peer reviewed studies have concluded the typical male queer consumes 22.46 lbs of fecal matter on an annual basis.
Peer reviewed studies have concluded Bernard (who also posts under several other aliases) posts 22.46 lbs of fecal matter on a daily basis.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#183977 Mar 20, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
I edited out the part of your post that was irrelevant, I damn near had to delete the whole thing!!!
You have no integrity, and no point to make.
LOLSER!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#183979 Mar 20, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
They were.
They chose to have me.
Too bad the attempt to abort you didn't succeed, and just left you seriously brain damaged.
Oh Rose, still living on the playground I see.

Do you have anything intelligent to say- EVER?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Montebello Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 39 min Bruin For Life 27,410
Do you use self storage? (Feb '11) 1 hr Cory Trevor 27
Scam: Scammers defraud aspiring 'secret' or '... 2 hr Joan 1
Review: Crystal Pacific Window and Door System (Aug '10) 2 hr Cory Trevor 15
Has Gaga Lost the Gays? 2 hr Belle Sexton 2
Garcia and Lozano NO SHOWS for forum on Drivers... 3 hr Once Again 1
Revised EIR on Montebello Hills Proposal Still ... 3 hr Whole Story 5
•••

Montebello News Video

•••
•••

Montebello Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Montebello People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Montebello News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Montebello
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••