Bush to Host Karzai, Musharraf for Meal

Bush to Host Karzai, Musharraf for Meal

There are 17 comments on the The Associated Press story from Sep 27, 2006, titled Bush to Host Karzai, Musharraf for Meal . In it, The Associated Press reports that:

Afghan President Hamid Karzai calls Pakistani President Gen. Pervez Musharraf 'my brother.' But after months of bickering between the two key allies in the global terror fight, President Bush decided it was ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Associated Press.

Yada

Humble, TX

#1 Sep 27, 2006
Will there be meat slung before them!
speed_buggy

United States

#2 Sep 27, 2006
I can't wait to see what's on the list of edibles?

Traditional middle eastern or American fare?
Yada

Humble, TX

#3 Sep 27, 2006
speed_buggy wrote:
I can't wait to see what's on the list of edibles?
Traditional middle eastern or American fare?
I liked you comment so.
By the way we sling meat at politicians we disapporove of in my culture. The people are slightly placid see and won't do anything more drastic or assaultive than hurling meat.
speed_buggy

United States

#4 Sep 27, 2006
Yada wrote:
<quoted text>
I liked you comment so.
By the way we sling meat at politicians we disapporove of in my culture. The people are slightly placid see and won't do anything more drastic or assaultive than hurling meat.
What is that symbolic of? Are they vegatarians? They sling pork?
speed_buggy

United States

#5 Sep 27, 2006
If you sling anything at a politician in America it is taken the same as attempted assassination.
tater slocum

United States

#6 Sep 27, 2006
i hope bush does better with body language than he does with english.
Jones

Bergenfield, NJ

#7 Sep 27, 2006
Both leaders of Pakistan and Afghanistan are involved in one of the most critical wars of the free world against the Islamic terrorists of Taliban and al Qaida. However, US troops in Afghanistan report that the number of Taliban Islamic terrorists’ attacks has tripled since the truce between the Musharraf and pro-Taliban Pashtuns tribes. According to the agreement, the Pashtuns were supposed to stop the Taliban from crossing the border and attack Afghani government soldiers and officials. Obviously, Pakistan president general Musharraf is blamed by Afghani President Karzai for the escalation of the Taliban Islamic terrorists attacks in Afghanistan that bring killing of hundreds if innocent Afghani civilians, government officials and soldiers and causing destruction in Afghanistan that was freed on 2001 from the Taliban regime, and was making progress as democratic Islamic country. It is clear that Musharraf control of the Pashtuns tribe is limited, and Musharraf rule in Pakistan is under continuous threat of coups by the Islamic extremist groups in Pakistan. President Bush needs Musharraf cooperation for fighting the Islamic terrorists in Pakistan which is the second largest Islamic country with 160 million Muslims, but he understand that Musharraf contribution to US war on terror is limited.
speed_buggy

United States

#8 Sep 27, 2006
tater slocum wrote:
i hope bush does better with body language than he does with english.
"The illiteracy level of our children are appalling."
G.W.B. Washington, D.C. Jan. 23 2004

"Rarely is the question asked: Is our children learning?" G.W.B. Florence, S.C. Jan. 11 2000
Wiley

Broadview Heights, OH

#9 Sep 27, 2006
Dont worry everybody !!!!!

We'll just capture another world leader that has nothing to do with terrorism. Imprison him. Put him on trial. Then let his country fall to shambles in civil unrest. That will bring the terror alert level back down to green !!! Greenish-blue very safe secure colors.

AMERICAN POLITICS ARE A JOKE
THE SYSTEM DOESN'T WORK !!! ME AND MANY LIKE ME WILL NOT FALL INTO THE REPUBLICAN CONTROL MECHANISM OF VOTING.....

The rest of you, though, should get in line, just like they want you to and go vote. Like it even makes a difference who you vote for. You are all
pawns in a game you play no part of. Don't be suprised if the dominant political party of the next century is Republican. Even if 90% votes democrat.
smoke

Auckland, New Zealand

#10 Sep 27, 2006
Wiley wrote:
Dont worry everybody !!!!!
We'll just capture another world leader that has nothing to do with terrorism. Imprison him. Put him on trial. Then let his country fall to shambles in civil unrest. That will bring the terror alert level back down to green !!! Greenish-blue very safe secure colors.
AMERICAN POLITICS ARE A JOKE
THE SYSTEM DOESN'T WORK !!! ME AND MANY LIKE ME WILL NOT FALL INTO THE REPUBLICAN CONTROL MECHANISM OF VOTING.....
The rest of you, though, should get in line, just like they want you to and go vote. Like it even makes a difference who you vote for. You are all
pawns in a game you play no part of. Don't be suprised if the dominant political party of the next century is Republican. Even if 90% votes democrat.
Much like how Bush won in Florida.Why vote?The vote counting software is rigged and the supreme court will rule on who pay's more even if vote counting by hand is'nt finished.
Easymoney

United States

#11 Sep 27, 2006
Jones wrote:
"Both leaders of Pakistan and Afghanistan are involved in one of the most critical wars of the free world against the Islamic terrorists of Taliban and al Qaida. However, US troops in Afghanistan report that the number of Taliban Islamic terrorists’ attacks has tripled since the truce between the Musharraf and pro-Taliban Pashtuns tribes. According to the agreement, the Pashtuns were supposed to stop the Taliban from crossing the border and attack Afghani government soldiers and officials. Obviously, Pakistan president general Musharraf is blamed by Afghani President Karzai for the escalation of the Taliban Islamic terrorists attacks in Afghanistan that bring killing of hundreds if innocent Afghani civilians, government officials and soldiers and causing destruction in Afghanistan that was freed on 2001 from the Taliban regime, and was making progress as democratic Islamic country. It is clear that Musharraf control of the Pashtuns tribe is limited, and Musharraf rule in Pakistan is under continuous threat of coups by the Islamic extremist groups in Pakistan. President Bush needs Musharraf cooperation for fighting the Islamic terrorists in Pakistan which is the second largest Islamic country with 160 million Muslims, but he understand that Musharraf contribution to US war on terror is limited."
Both leaders of Pakistan and Afghanistan are involved in one of the most critical wars of the free world against the Islamic terrorists of Taliban and al Qaida. However, US troops in Afghanistan report that the number of Taliban Islamic terrorists’ attacks has tripled since the truce between the Musharraf and pro-Taliban Pashtuns tribes. According to the agreement, the Pashtuns were supposed to stop the Taliban from crossing the border and attack Afghani government soldiers and officials. Obviously, Pakistan president general Musharraf is blamed by Afghani President Karzai for the escalation of the Taliban Islamic terrorists attacks in Afghanistan that bring killing of hundreds if innocent Afghani civilians, government officials and soldiers and causing destruction in Afghanistan that was freed on 2001 from the Taliban regime, and was making progress as democratic Islamic country. It is clear that Musharraf control of the Pashtuns tribe is limited, and Musharraf rule in Pakistan is under continuous threat of coups by the Islamic extremist groups in Pakistan. President Bush needs Musharraf cooperation for fighting the Islamic terrorists in Pakistan which is the second largest Islamic country with 160 million Muslims, but he understand that Musharraf contribution to US war on terror is limited.

No ?
speed_buggy

United States

#12 Sep 28, 2006
Easymoney wrote:
<quoted text>Both leaders of Pakistan and Afghanistan are involved in one of the most critical wars of the free world against the Islamic terrorists of Taliban and al Qaida. However, US troops in Afghanistan report that the number of Taliban Islamic terrorists’ attacks has tripled since the truce between the Musharraf and pro-Taliban Pashtuns tribes. According to the agreement, the Pashtuns were supposed to stop the Taliban from crossing the border and attack Afghani government soldiers and officials. Obviously, Pakistan president general Musharraf is blamed by Afghani President Karzai for the escalation of the Taliban Islamic terrorists attacks in Afghanistan that bring killing of hundreds if innocent Afghani civilians, government officials and soldiers and causing destruction in Afghanistan that was freed on 2001 from the Taliban regime, and was making progress as democratic Islamic country. It is clear that Musharraf control of the Pashtuns tribe is limited, and Musharraf rule in Pakistan is under continuous threat of coups by the Islamic extremist groups in Pakistan. President Bush needs Musharraf cooperation for fighting the Islamic terrorists in Pakistan which is the second largest Islamic country with 160 million Muslims, but he understand that Musharraf contribution to US war on terror is limited.
No ?
Somehow someway the Pakistan government will be overthrown. The terrorists want nukes and Pakistan is the closest regional source for acquiring them by force.
leo from shanghai

United States

#13 Sep 28, 2006
musharraf and karzai will be living in gated estates in south florida within three years. the cia keeps their get away jets fueled and ready to escape the coming coups. musharraf, karzai, blair and bush are geeting ready to cash in.
Jones

Bergenfield, NJ

#14 Sep 28, 2006
speed_buggy wrote:
<quoted text>
Somehow someway the Pakistan government will be overthrown. The terrorists want nukes and Pakistan is the closest regional source for acquiring them by force.
Good point. The Islamic terrorists' uprising against the world and humanity which is also called Islamic fascism is getting acceleration. It all depends on US, UK and Israel to stop the Islamic madness. President Bush is the right leader to stop the Islamic terrorists uprising.
speed_buggy

Arlington, TN

#15 Sep 28, 2006
Jones wrote:
<quoted text>
Good point. The Islamic terrorists' uprising against the world and humanity which is also called Islamic fascism is getting acceleration. It all depends on US, UK and Israel to stop the Islamic madness. President Bush is the right leader to stop the Islamic terrorists uprising.
They want nukes so if the opposition starts eyeballing what they know that the terrorists want anyway then they won't get caught with their pants down.

If the terrorists do get theirs hands on those nukes it is only because the opposition of the terrorists for some evil and ulterior reason wanted them to have them and allowed them do do it because they can in no way say that they were not aware that going after those nukes was not on the terrorist agenda or that they did not know or suspect that terrorists interests would do that.

These wannabe military strategists, Rummy and his gang, could only be taking it for granted that the terrorists acquiring these nukes is impossible or unattainable. They have misjudged and underestimated everything they have put their hand to so far so this is the same incompetence that will be responsible if the terrorists do get the nukes.

Also, these terrorists are chameleons, spies, they look and talk the way they want when they want and where they want and the leader of Pakistan could very well be playing the US for a fool. I do not like him, his eyes and voice don't match his words, he is playing a game and is in this for whatever he can get out of it. I partly suspect that because he is falling way short on his side of the front when this should not be happening.
Yada

Humble, TX

#16 Oct 12, 2006
speed_buggy wrote:
If you sling anything at a politician in America it is taken the same as attempted assassination.
I hear you. We sling rotted meat to showcase the stench of their corruption and immorality when it suits us.
speed_buggy

Arlington, TN

#17 Oct 12, 2006
Yada wrote:
<quoted text>
I hear you. We sling rotted meat to showcase the stench of their corruption and immorality when it suits us.
We here are stuck with posting our opinions online and are stuck with being labeled pro terrorist since anyone that disagrees with the Bush administration is classed as pro terrorist and spied on.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Monrovia Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Family argument ends in shooting (Oct '07) Mar 20 lthomascordell 5
News Injured man found in a ditch along I-70 (Feb '13) Mar '18 DeDominicis 2
Dustin Vanhook (Jul '15) Feb '18 bigLB 7
Camby/Wiser Addition Feb '18 bigLB 4
Looking for (Feb '11) Jan '18 Monterey 7
News When The KKK Was Mainstream (Mar '15) Jan '18 C Kersey 35
Diane Draper Dec '17 Sam I Am 1

Monrovia Jobs

Personal Finance

Monrovia Mortgages