You are a total buffoon. Have you ever taken an upper level (college) business or economics class? I doubt it, or I doubt that you either believed or understood if you did.To be clear, NOT AGAINST PROFITS.
Profits should come AFTER WORKERS ARE PAID A LIVING WAGE w/Benefits. Even Ronald Reagan agreed with this. He Campaigned on it and then dropped the ball big time!
I don't think I can be any clearer. Investment "unearned income" comes second to earned income. If it is done correctly, then there is no reason to change the unearned rate. Again, this is what Reagan, your hero, campaigned on.
The Pope is on board too!
I ask once again: DEFINE living wage, with specifics (numbers, etc.) not your generic "a wage high enough to live on" idiocy. You keep saying it, define it.