There are millions of AK's floating around. Two of the millions were fired during a fire fight with a border patrol officer, one delivered the fatal shot, and both were discarded by the perpetrators at the crime scene. Which one of the two fired the fatal shot is inconclusive due to the bullet rifling marks being damaged. BOTH rifles were obtained by dangerous criminals via Fast and Furious. Does matter for my point, F & F got a US law enforcement officer killed<quoted text>
It could have been fired from one of several hundred thousand weapons.
You kid is on trial for first degree murder. The cops say that they can prove he is guilty and it lies in the forensics of the bullet they recover and they can be absolutely positively sure that it might have come from the gun he had in the trunk of his car... or a gun just like it with the same caliber or something close to the same caliber.
And he is the only one who could have done it, only him... or one of the four other guys who ran away when the cops stopped the car.
I am glad you can be absolutely positive the bullet might have came from one of the guns.
If my kid allegedly committed a crime and there was the same amount of evidence, I would say he is guilty and needs to pay the price for his actions.
This is the difference between a conservative and a lib. A conservative takes responsibility while a lib makes up excuses to cover up their actions.