|
Real State
AOL
|
Judged:
1
1
Of our union has gotten the memo that has refuted the union thugs! Wisconsin voters have spoken loud and clear. Democrats are evil. Their tax and unaccountablity has been refuted !!!! Illinois is ruled by ttyrants and corruption!!!!! VOTE 2012
|
|
Wow look at this
Manassas, VA
|
Judged:
1
1
Reply »|Report Abuse|Judge it!|#6016Sep 29, 2011 Judged:311 On July 7, 2011 the Department of Labor submitted the 4100 pages of documents for an "in camera" review along with further declarations to provide the Court with sufficient information to decide whether the requested materials fall within Exemption 7(A). On July 11, 2011, Frank Christensen submitted a motion to ask the Court to release the Department of Labor's Declarations filed on July 7, 2011. On July 20, 2011 the Department of Labor submitted a motion to oppose Frank Christensen's motion to release the Department of Labor's Declaration. In that motion, the Department of Labor stated the reason why the declaration should not be released to the Plaintiffs'(Frank Christensen and Elevator Constructors Local 2) is because the declaration, "fully details the pending investigation, including the identification of the charges being investigated and the identification of informants".[18] On August 17, 2011 in a Federal District Court ruling; Frank Christensen and Elevator Constructors Local 2; lost its FOIA lawsuit against the United States Department of Labor: In the Memorandum and Order, United States District Court Judge Ruben Castillo ruled that he Grants the Department of Labor's motion for summary judgment and Denies Elevator Constructors Local 2 and Frank Christensen's motion for summary judgment and motion for disclosure. Judge Castillo stated, that Dept. of Labor District Director Mary Kebisek's 29-page declaration submitted in camera is specific, detailed and demonstrates that the withheld documents logically fall within Exemption 7(A). The declaration consists of:(1) an explanation of the complaints and allegations that led to the initiation of the criminal investigation; (2) a description of the pending criminal investigation; (3) a description of the closed civil investigations and how they relate to the pending criminal investigation; (4) an identification of the documents responsive to the Union's FOIA request; and (5) an explanation of how disclosure of those documents would harm the pending criminal investigation. Kebisek highlights in detail the risk that disclosure of these documents would prematurely reveal the Department of Labor's evidence, as well as the nature, scope, direction and focus of its investigations. This, in turn could enable the targets-here, the Union, its officers, employers and employees-to destroy or alter the evidence or construct defenses. Releasing the withheld information could enable the Union, its officers, and employees to identify the witnesses and confidential informants assisting the Department of Labor in its investigations, raising the possibility of witness intimidations and harassment. Finally, the Court denies the Union's motion for disclosure of Kebisek's in camera declaration and any documents that were wrongfully withheld from the Union. As discussed above, the Court concludes that the requested documents were properly withheld by the Department. Additionally, the Court has determined that no portion of Kebisek's in camera declaration can be disclosed without revealing the information the Department of Labor seeks to protect.[19. Have we ever gotten a answer on this it looks like the boyz are still under the microscope.
|
|
Name callers
La Grange, IL
|
Judged:
1
Yes we will call criminals criminals why else would there be a criminal investigation and I'm sure franks a beat off I read that somewhere.
|
|
Facts Speak Loudly
AOL
|
Judged:
1
1
Wow look at this wrote: Reply »|Report Abuse|Judge it!|#6016Sep 29, 2011 Judged:311 On July 7, 2011 the Department of Labor submitted the 4100 pages of documents for an "in camera" review along with further declarations to provide the Court with sufficient information to decide whether the requested materials fall within Exemption 7(A). On July 11, 2011, Frank Christensen submitted a motion to ask the Court to release the Department of Labor's Declarations filed on July 7, 2011. On July 20, 2011 the Department of Labor submitted a motion to oppose Frank Christensen's motion to release the Department of Labor's Declaration. In that motion, the Department of Labor stated the reason why the declaration should not be released to the Plaintiffs'(Frank Christensen and Elevator Constructors Local 2) is because the declaration, "fully details the pending investigation, including the identification of the charges being investigated and the identification of informants".[18] On August 17, 2011 in a Federal District Court ruling; Frank Christensen and Elevator Constructors Local 2; lost its FOIA lawsuit against the United States Department of Labor: In the Memorandum and Order, United States District Court Judge Ruben Castillo ruled that he Grants the Department of Labor's motion for summary judgment and Denies Elevator Constructors Local 2 and Frank Christensen's motion for summary judgment and motion for disclosure. Judge Castillo stated, that Dept. of Labor District Director Mary Kebisek's 29-page declaration submitted in camera is specific, detailed and demonstrates that the withheld documents logically fall within Exemption 7(A). The declaration consists of:(1) an explanation of the complaints and allegations that led to the initiation of the criminal investigation; (2) a description of the pending criminal investigation; (3) a description of the closed civil investigations and how they relate to the pending criminal investigation; (4) an identification of the documents responsive to the Union's FOIA request; and (5) an explanation of how disclosure of those documents would harm the pending criminal investigation. Kebisek highlights in detail the risk that disclosure of these documents would prematurely reveal the Department of Labor's evidence, as well as the nature, scope, direction and focus of its investigations. This, in turn could enable the targets-here, the Union, its officers, employers and employees-to destroy or alter the evidence or construct defenses. Releasing the withheld information could enable the Union, its officers, and employees to identify the witnesses and confidential informants assisting the Department of Labor in its investigations, raising the possibility of witness intimidations and harassment. Finally, the Court denies the Union's motion for disclosure of Kebisek's in camera declaration and any documents that were wrongfully withheld from the Union. As discussed above, the Court concludes that the requested documents were properly withheld by the Department. Additionally, the Court has determined that no portion of Kebisek's in camera declaration can be disclosed without revealing the information the Department of Labor seeks to protect.[19. Have we ever gotten a answer on this it looks like the boyz are still under the microscope. Yes it still continues, this is factual proof that a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION EXISTS !!!! You don't need a "quorum" to figure that out. See what happens when the members demand answers, they hide behind their lawyers.
|
|
Frank Fan
Chicago, IL
|
It's over and the DOL has decided not to persue further, end of question, goodnight Irene, the fat lady has sung, you can put it in the books...yes!
|
|
Criminal Union
AOL
|
Judged:
1
Wow look at this wrote: Reply »|Report Abuse|Judge it!|#6016Sep 29, 2011 Judged:311 On July 7, 2011 the Department of Labor submitted the 4100 pages of documents for an "in camera" review along with further declarations to provide the Court with sufficient information to decide whether the requested materials fall within Exemption 7(A). On July 11, 2011, Frank Christensen submitted a motion to ask the Court to release the Department of Labor's Declarations filed on July 7, 2011. On July 20, 2011 the Department of Labor submitted a motion to oppose Frank Christensen's motion to release the Department of Labor's Declaration. In that motion, the Department of Labor stated the reason why the declaration should not be released to the Plaintiffs'(Frank Christensen and Elevator Constructors Local 2) is because the declaration, "fully details the pending investigation, including the identification of the charges being investigated and the identification of informants".[18] On August 17, 2011 in a Federal District Court ruling; Frank Christensen and Elevator Constructors Local 2; lost its FOIA lawsuit against the United States Department of Labor: In the Memorandum and Order, United States District Court Judge Ruben Castillo ruled that he Grants the Department of Labor's motion for summary judgment and Denies Elevator Constructors Local 2 and Frank Christensen's motion for summary judgment and motion for disclosure. Judge Castillo stated, that Dept. of Labor District Director Mary Kebisek's 29-page declaration submitted in camera is specific, detailed and demonstrates that the withheld documents logically fall within Exemption 7(A). The declaration consists of:(1) an explanation of the complaints and allegations that led to the initiation of the criminal investigation; (2) a description of the pending criminal investigation; (3) a description of the closed civil investigations and how they relate to the pending criminal investigation; (4) an identification of the documents responsive to the Union's FOIA request; and (5) an explanation of how disclosure of those documents would harm the pending criminal investigation. Kebisek highlights in detail the risk that disclosure of these documents would prematurely reveal the Department of Labor's evidence, as well as the nature, scope, direction and focus of its investigations. This, in turn could enable the targets-here, the Union, its officers, employers and employees-to destroy or alter the evidence or construct defenses. Releasing the withheld information could enable the Union, its officers, and employees to identify the witnesses and confidential informants assisting the Department of Labor in its investigations, raising the possibility of witness intimidations and harassment. Finally, the Court denies the Union's motion for disclosure of Kebisek's in camera declaration and any documents that were wrongfully withheld from the Union. As discussed above, the Court concludes that the requested documents were properly withheld by the Department. Additionally, the Court has determined that no portion of Kebisek's in camera declaration can be disclosed without revealing the information the Department of Labor seeks to protect.[19. Have we ever gotten a answer on this it looks like the boyz are still under the microscope. That's what this tells me! Frank lies to the members and the general public by telling them he is not the TARGET of a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION. How many Sons of Liberty have been supeaoned ? I find it comical that frank blames the Sons of Liberty for this Criminal Investigation, reminds me of blago more everyday.
|
|
Wow
AOL
|
Same old stuff, C'mon, Give me something more. Since 2008 you have been telling everyone the officers of Local 2 are going down. Nothing has happened and nothing will happen. Don't you have any new information ? Stewart and Lynch and all the others that are not Local 2 members anymore are on this sight and all you can give us Frank is a Jerk off and the DOL is going to get him. Your living a DREAM without a job as an Union Elevator Constructor. Keep on believing you WON and something is going to happen. What you don't realize is Local 2 is running very well without you Idiots, everone wishes the economey was better but it's not, give it time things will get better in Chicago work wise but you will still be writing on this board and won't be a member of Local 2.
|
|
Criminal Enterprise
AOL
|
Judged:
1
The members wanna know, What's the Glitch Frank lies to the members time after time He will not tell them he committed a crime The members money is very well hidden To steal members money is very forbidden The members want answers, they are here on this board A Criminal Investigation has hit the right cord Frankies mafia fantasy is all coming true It will all end when they start flashing blue Frankie & Eddie have poisoned our future Nothing can help not even a suture A union is started because of UNITY It will all end on pleas for immunity Democracy is ugly when the dems are in charge The corruption is bad and oh so large A union is microcosm of a failed democracy Especially when it is flooded with EXTREME HYPOCRISY You have no rights is the unions claim to fame Frankie & Edddie will never show no shame When you stand for your rights, your supposed to be protected ! In the governments eyes you are nothing but neglected ! Frankie & Eddie have charted our course They go on with their business with no remorse This path of destruction will always continue Leaving a trail of corruptive residue Sons of Liberty have produced the TRUTH IUEC still relys on that girl named Ruth Read the Court Documents, its a hellava read Putting to rest they are a corruptive breed
|
|
|
|
Frank Fan
La Grange, IL
|
The thing I admire most about Frank is how he put duty to the union over when his friends are doing wrong. Look how he made the hard decision to charge Hynes and Sena. Now he's leading the investigation against Brigham and Higgins after Stringer squeeled. Frank was asked to sweep the investigation under the carpet, Frank refused and said that iy was too late to do anything but perform his solemn duty. That is why Frank should be the next General President because of his strength, duty and most of all INTEGRITY
|
|
Slim
Midlothian, IL
|
Judged:
1
Psychic spies from China Try to steal your mind's elation Little girls from Sweden Dream of silver screen quotations And if you want these kind of dreams It's Californication It's the edge of the world And all of western civilization The sun may rise in the East At least it settles in the final location It's understood that Hollywood sells Californication Pay your surgeon very well To break the spell of aging Celebrity skin is this your chin Or is that war your waging First born unicorn Hard core soft porn Dream of Californication Dream of Californication Marry me girl be my fairy to the world Be my very own constellation A teenage bride with a baby inside Getting high on information And buy me a star on the boulevard It's Californication Space may be the final frontier But it's made in a Hollywood basement Cobain can you hear the spheres Singing songs off station to station And Alderaan's not far away It's Californication Born and raised by those who praise Control of population everybody's been there and I don't mean on vacation Destruction leads to a very rough road But it also breeds creation And earthquakes are to a girl's guitar They're just another good vibration And tidal waves couldn't save the world From Californication Pay your surgeon very well To break the spell of aging Sicker than the rest There is no test But this is what you're craving
|
|
Union Dem Criminalization
AOL
|
Judged:
1
The members wanna know, What's the Glitch Frank lies to the members time after time He will not tell them he committed a crime The members money is very well hidden To steal members money is very forbidden The members want answers, they are here on this board A Criminal Investigation has hit the right cord Frankies mafia fantasy is all coming true It will all end when they start flashing blue Frankie & Eddie have poisoned our future Nothing can help not even a suture A union is started because of UNITY It will all end on pleas for immunity Democracy is ugly when the dems are in charge The corruption is bad and oh so large A union is microcosm of a failed democracy Especially when it is flooded with EXTREME HYPOCRISY You have no rights is the unions claim to fame Frankie & Edddie will never show no shame When you stand for your rights, your supposed to be protected ! In the governments eyes you are nothing but neglected ! Frankie & Eddie have charted our course They go on with their business with no remorse This path of destruction will always continue Leaving a trail of corruptive residue Sons of Liberty have produced the TRUTH IUEC still relys on that girl named Ruth Read the Court Documents, its a hellava read Putting to rest they are a corruptive breed
|
|
Frank Fan
Chicago, IL
|
Finnally Dana won't be able to keep Frank from getting to the International. Because of Dana's greed and stupidity and Higgins being the New York meathead that he is, Frank will finally get his chance to be on the three General Officers of the International and hopefully the General President. Frank has the leadership skills and the Intergrity to do the job. Frank has lead this local through prosperity and hard times for the last 11 years doing a great job. He fought back a campaign to get him from the DOL, where most people would have given up, Frank rose to the occasion and spanked the DOL into submission. He always maintained his innocence and the proof is he won against the DOL, not many can say that. Frank makes the tough decisions and always puts his obligation to the union first, perfect example is how he got rid of his friends Sena and Hynes when the did wrong. Now he's cleaning up the International. Even Dana couldn't bribe him from doing his duty. If you look up the words Honor or Integrity in the dictionary you will see a picture of Frank Christensen.
|
|
I agree
Chicago, IL
|
Frank would make a great general president. I'm very disappointed in Dana Brigham and Jim Higgins, it's a shame. We know that Frank will lead the investigation honestly and the chips will fall where they may, Frank will do the right thing for the union and the membership.
|
|
Blagos Buds
AOL
|
Judged:
1
1
On August 17, 2011 in a Federal District Court ruling; Frank Christensen and Elevator Constructors Local 2; lost its FOIA lawsuit against the United States Department of Labor: In the Memorandum and Order, United States District Court Judge Ruben Castillo ruled that he Grants the Department of Labor's motion for summary judgment and Denies Elevator Constructors Local 2 and Frank Christensen's motion for summary judgment and motion for disclosure. Judge Castillo stated, that Dept. of Labor District Director Mary Kebisek's 29-page declaration submitted in camera is specific, detailed and demonstrates that the withheld documents logically fall within Exemption 7(A). The declaration consists of:(1) an explanation of the complaints and allegations that led to the initiation of the criminal investigation; (2) a description of the pending criminal investigation; (3) a description of the closed civil investigations and how they relate to the pending criminal investigation; (4) an identification of the documents responsive to the Union's FOIA request; and (5) an explanation of how disclosure of those documents would harm the pending criminal investigation. Kebisek highlights in detail the risk that disclosure of these documents would prematurely reveal the Department of Labor's evidence, as well as the nature, scope, direction and focus of its investigations. This, in turn could enable the targets-here, the Union, its officers, employers and employees-to destroy or alter the evidence or construct defenses. Releasing the withheld information could enable the Union, its officers, and employees to identify the witnesses and confidential informants assisting the Department of Labor in its investigations, raising the possibility of witness intimidations and harassment. Finally, the Court denies the Union's motion for disclosure of Kebisek's in camera declaration and any documents that were wrongfully withheld from the Union. As discussed above, the Court concludes that the requested documents were properly withheld by the Department. Additionally, the Court has determined that no portion of Kebisek's in camera declaration can be disclosed without revealing the information the Department of Labor seeks to protect.[19. This says everything you need to know! The DOL is coming, that is a fact. The writing retard doesn't know how to read! VOTE 2012
|
|
Frank Fan
La Grange, IL
|
Frank will soon ascend to a long deserved position at the International. The DOL has been spanked and put to bed like an insulant child. The Sons of Liberty have been defeated and are riding off into the history pages. Like a few Japanese soldiers after WWII, Brad and Lynch are hiding in the jungles refusing to believe the war is over. The union whole again thanks to the steady leadership and integrity of Frank Christensen.
|
|
Frank Fan
Chicago, IL
|
I can't believe the Sons of Liberty were correct, Frank will soon be gone as Business Manager. Yeah is true. But the difference is going to the International either as a Regional or one of the three General Officers.
|
|
Criminals Union
Oak Forest, IL
|
Judged:
1
That is comical. How did he beat the DOL? To lie to the membership is SOP at iuec. To bargain away their rights is also. Read the Court Documents and make up your own minds. Just like the democrats who believe they are entitled to everybodies civil liberties!!! Do you believe that frank will not answer questions unless they are in writing ? Who does he think he is Micheal Corleon ??
|
|
We Need Walker
Oak Forest, IL
|
Judged:
1
This is a governor that understands how to move a state forward, not drowned it in corruption!!!!!
|
|
for the 1000
Bolingbrook, IL
|
Judged:
1
1
time frank is a big beat off, frank fan wipe your lips off you got franks little jizz drops all over your face. but people tell me you love to work under cover or is it just under franks little desk man you need to get out and hear what people think about your so called beat off hero its not good....
|
|
Frank Fan
La Grange, IL
|
Criminals Union wrote: That is comical. How did he beat the DOL? To lie to the membership is SOP at iuec. To bargain away their rights is also. Read the Court Documents and make up your own minds. Just like the democrats who believe they are entitled to everybodies civil liberties!!! Do you believe that frank will not answer questions unless they are in writing ? Who does he think he is Micheal Corleon ?? Its been almost a year since the Court Documents came out and the DOL did nothing and they're not going to do nothing either because in May a letter was sent to the Hall and to you SOL buddy saying that the Department was not taking further action in this matter. Its over Brad, its over Lynch we beat you, we won.
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|