Our View:There's no upside to job losses at GE
Who can best determine whether GE Transportation's proposal to keep jobs at its Lawrence Park plant would have been acceptable to GE's hourly employees? Ideally, it should have been the workers whose jobs are at stake.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Erie Times News.
#2 Jun 26, 2013
Two years ago none of the 950 employees were working at GE. GE hired them as payback to obama to lower the unemployement numbers before the election and now that obama has won they are no longer needed. All you obama voters should ask yourselves why obama stopped Boeing from moving to a right to work state but is allowing GE to move to a right to work state. You suckers voted for obamas false promises and now you have to live with the results.
#4 Jun 26, 2013
You're dumb, no lie? Lame comeback and you didn't refute any of the FACTS I posted. In this case the Truth really does hurt doesn't it?
#5 Jun 26, 2013
Again, what did the union win by their stance?
GE workers forget they work for GE, its not the other way around.
#6 Jun 26, 2013
I don't have to pay union dues no more. Sunshine here I come
#9 Jun 26, 2013
Why do you idiot UE506ers think they built the plant in Tx in the 1st place?
"Right to work state" Dah!
Less in wages, more productive work rules.
No brainer in my opinion.
I'm sorry you suckers voted for Obama. Our scandal Pres.
Add your comments below
|Weinstein and dems||4 hr||David Vitter||5|
|P.C. hates my cut and pastes!||5 hr||True News||9|
|ge allowing sexual harassment by black employees||5 hr||Space Man||35|
|TC Carney||5 hr||Ernie S||22|
|Drain the swamp (Mar '17)||6 hr||Johnny||3|
|Warning for Millcreek residents||7 hr||Missed the mark||20|
|Vote Lisa Ferrick||7 hr||Treasurer||35|
Find what you want!
Search Mohrsville Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC