Trees can't do things like that, idiot. Are you so dumb because your brain is made out of tissues with two different sets of tissues that don't communicate?VV, maybe this analogy will help your foolishness;
The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
An apple tree bearing fruit.
An apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
An walnut tree who never bears any fruit wanting to be a apple tree.
An walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.
Stupid! The ability to bear apples is part of the definition of an apple tree, in fact, it's pretty much the definition. The ability to have children is NOT part of the indention of marriage.The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too is simply silly.
If our rights depend on our genes, should you be allowed to marry?Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
You already have both sets!
Speaking of evolution, do you think you should have been aborted?
And stupid, allowing gay marriage will not remove the element of procreation, people will still procreate.Gay couples do not just fail in the primary essence of marriage, out of all relationships, they are the oxymoron of marriage.
Moreover, if you remove the element of procreation, you dumb down marriage to just a friendship. Hardly a cause for government interest, let alone selective discrimination.
You are welcome.