Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201887 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Winston Smith

Mechanicsville, MD

#162873 Oct 13, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
If there weren't differing opinions no matter how dumb or smart, then it would be very boring. Think about it. Imagine if only "frisbee" was here posting his dopey nonsense about "owning" people etc. THAT would be boring!
Differing opinions are fine by me. The boring bit is the continuous litany of drivel coming from most of the opposing posters. About the only one in here with any interesting posts opposing is AKpilot. The rest of 'em amount to little more than taunting and juvenile insults. Or allegations of pending doom should gay couples be allowed to marry. And we can't leave off the ill informed blathering about HIV either.
Winston Smith

Mechanicsville, MD

#162875 Oct 13, 2012
mikey wrote:
Another activist judge going against the will of the Moral Majority. Marriage is has been and will always be between a Man and a Women.
The "Moral Majority" is neither.

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#162876 Oct 13, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
That means that your tranny ass doesn't belong in the world, and you should have been incinerated long ago....right at the abortion clinic, instead of being hatched in the psycho ward, in a petrie jar, marked "abortion, not quite finished"
Oh, fundie, that's unkind speech!
"So get rid of all evil behavior. Be done with all deceit, hypocrisy, jealousy, and all unkind speech." 1 Peter 2:1

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#162878 Oct 13, 2012
mikey wrote:
Another activist judge going against the will of the Moral Majority. Marriage is has been and will always be between a Man and a Women.
There is no such thing as an "activist judge", it's just one of many con dumb boogie men.
And there is nothing moral about going against the 14th Amendment. It's unAmerican.

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#162879 Oct 13, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry yourself, stupid, there are lots of things wrong with your lifestyle. Are you saying that to try to be edgy, or do you honestly believe that tripe you're spouting ?
Example off the top of my head: child porn is wrong,
Rose's Law...
R Hudson wrote:
<
even if all parties consent to it. So there's that ...
Children can't give consent in any meaningful way.
Comic Relief

Glendora, CA

#162880 Oct 13, 2012
Always another sticky-wicket to deal with.
Smokin Joe

Redondo Beach, CA

#162883 Oct 13, 2012
THE LAST TEA BUTTLICKER wrote:
<quoted text>
im guessin you're not quite out of your teens yet.
Wrong !!!!
Smokin Joe

Redondo Beach, CA

#162886 Oct 13, 2012
Winston Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
Sooo, in addition to being miserable, you're an attention [email protected]
You are a pathetic FK

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#162887 Oct 13, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh my. Aren't you getting abusive now, I must've gotten on your last nerve, eh ?
Marriage is a vital social institution between two members of the opposite sex. It goes way beyond just an emotional relationship---it serves a vital role inthe stability and continuity of our society, something which homosexual marriages cannot provide. Unfortunately, the biggest victory of the gay movement has been to shift the debate from a 'behavior' to identity, whereby those that oppose homosexuality are considered bigoted or hateful.
You're both.
R Hudson wrote:
They have equated it to the Civil Rights Movement, seeking to obtain the rights granted under the constitution to all races or religions.
All US citizens should get equal rights.
R Hudson wrote:
Sexual behavior does not fall into either category!It is not about homosexuals wanting to enter into a 'marriage' so much as it is about them wanting to gain acceptance into mainstream society by redefining the traditional definition of the institution. It is a threat to society.
How?
R Hudson wrote:
It is not nature's way.
Eating your young is nature's way.
R Hudson wrote:
I just don't want you pushing your agenda on the majority who are not.
What, exactly is this "agenda"?
R Hudson wrote:
This is just about sexual preference--keep it in the bedroom. It is not about being denied any constitutional rights.
Yes, it is. It's a matter of equal rights for men and women.
R Hudson wrote:
This whole issue ties up valuable government resources and time, just to satisfy your need to be accepted, which was where my feelings were, accepting that you wish to be gay. It is the forceful way you are trying to redefine the very fabric of the meaning of marriage. It has been a traditionally defined ceremony for millenia, giving the aforementioned stability and definition to a special bond between man and woman. You wish to include yourselves in a way that renders the whole meaning obsolete and pointless. Why do you not simply accept your relationships with a separate and differing name and stop try to mimic us ? you are attempting to appropriate something you are not entitled to. Once you have achieved the desired result, now comes the public display of affection, gay parades,gay rallies, non-stop bombardment. The majority of us find this revolting and now have to avert our eyes and make explanations to our children
Rose's Law:
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"
If you are so stupid you can't figure out how to tell your kids, "Some men like women, some like men. Some women like men, some like women.", then maybe you should get a vasectomy.
R Hudson wrote:
that we never used to. This is part of the threat, the simple comfort we used to take for granted, now swept away. If I had a child who was gay, I would still love him , but that does not mean I have accept or condone the bad behavior.
How's that for shutting up, b!tch ?
Would have been better if you had just shut up, because you didn't explain how homosexuality is a threat to society. And, dummy, I'm straight.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#162889 Oct 13, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
And frisbee is owned!!!
He was a lot of fun. I think he's all played out now though, tells me I "don't merit further attention". I'll keep his dopey frisbee picture up for a while longer, maybe he'll bite.
Comic Relief

Glendora, CA

#162896 Oct 13, 2012
Your right r.c.h. did do comedy
Smokin Joe

Redondo Beach, CA

#162898 Oct 13, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You're both.
<quoted text>
All US citizens should get equal rights.
<quoted text>
How?
<quoted text>
Eating your young is nature's way.
<quoted text>
What, exactly is this "agenda"?
<quoted text>
Yes, it is. It's a matter of equal rights for men and women.
<quoted text>
Rose's Law:
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"
If you are so stupid you can't figure out how to tell your kids, "Some men like women, some like men. Some women like men, some like women.", then maybe you should get a vasectomy.
<quoted text>
Would have been better if you had just shut up, because you didn't explain how homosexuality is a threat to society. And, dummy, I'm straight.
You are reapeatig yourself again you tranny FKtard
Nosht

Huntington Beach, CA

#162899 Oct 13, 2012
Comic Relief wrote:
Always another sticky-wicket to deal with.
Comic Relief cups his carrot to stimulate that pea brain of his.

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#162903 Oct 13, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
So we are back to that ? Off-Topic. I made no racist statements.
Why bother to lie? It's up here for every one to see.

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#162904 Oct 13, 2012
Smokin Joe wrote:
<quoted text>
I've seen ... people with thin lips, light skin, straight hair and flat butts .. so it's a monkey. Keep pulling hte race card you tranny
Hey, hudson, when you use a sock puppet, don't make it so obvious.
BTW, your racial slur has been reported.

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#162905 Oct 13, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
and you call me a fundie ? Howling at you, now. Why try to throw the bible at me ? You have been mocking it for eternity. Now it is your weapon ? Laughing my ass off at you.
Fundies like you claim to believe the buy-bull, that's why I quote it to you.
You are too stupid to understand that, so you laugh.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#162906 Oct 13, 2012
THE LAST TEA BUTTLICKER wrote:
<quoted text>
all we need as a race is sperm and egg....
we could all be super gay and still make offspring??
what is your actual arguement here??
that marriage is needed for it to be a social agrangement?? where both parent share the responsibilities...??
but again, this can be acheived by adult commmunication between parents who ARNT married??
seeing as how the divorce rate is sky high(still) this is kind of a silly arguement to be having anyhow...
it is beneficial for both parents to be in a childs life on a super regular basis!!! but they dont have to be straight or be married to one another...
I think that notion is becoming slowly extinct.
You can stomp your feet all you like, it doesn't change the facts of where the SCOTUS stands on the issue.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#162907 Oct 13, 2012
Frisbee wrote:
<quoted text>He can't even admit he was wrong about Marriage being a right in the first place, even though that's what the Loving decision says. He also can't admit he's wrong when he absurdly claims, of all things, that the Constitution doesn't enumerate Rights. He's clinging to THAT nonsense.
You'll never get him to stand up like a man and admit any fault.
What you'll get is a lot of weaselly back-pedaling and attempts to retroactively revise his declarations. A lot of "depends on what your definition of 'is' is" type pathetic attempts at dodging are coming your way.
You aren't very bright are you?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#162908 Oct 13, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, I know...
You know something Rose?? That must be a new thing for you.
THE LAST TEA BUTTLICKER

Anderson, CA

#162910 Oct 13, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You can stomp your feet all you like, it doesn't change the facts of where the SCOTUS stands on the issue.
stomping my feet??

I guess I would be stomping them, if I was gay and wanted to get married to someone...BUT im not and I dont.

I was just telling who ever I was reponding to??(was it you?)

that marraige isnt really ABSOLUTELY needed for our race to survive.

doma will eventaully go the way that many other bigoted laws have gone....

extinction.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Mission Viejo Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
have you ever been ripped off by rsm toyota dea... (Apr '09) Dec 7 Harry Bretschneider 14
News They have gangs in south Orange County? (Dec '07) Dec 6 OhCe 139
Struggling with your college admissions essays?... Nov 17 thewritedirection 1
50 homes under threat as brush fire erupts on A... Nov 13 openmind693 1
News Election Day freebies: These places will give y... Nov 10 Well Well 2
Loud Rumbling Noise in Aliso Viejo (Jun '09) Nov '16 Lara Feamster 49
News Greg Haidl, Ex-Con (Jun '08) Nov '16 Bev 85

Mission Viejo Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Mission Viejo Mortgages