Impeach Obama over sequester?

Posted in the Minneapolis Forum

Comments (Page 2)

Showing posts 21 - 40 of60
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Ralph

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Mar 3, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Schmahl Spew wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't even deny it, you child-molesting POS!
Garbage response..

Fool.

Blank stare..
Schmahl Spew

Poland

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24
Mar 3, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

The two of you together don't have half a brain.
Ralph

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#25
Mar 3, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Whatever he cuts will be done by him and he will be held accountable.

It's quite normal for Government to cut where it hurts most when they are forced to cut. Examples are towns always cut COPs and firefighters FIRST. They NEVER cut parks and rec, community centers, city hall staff, roads, sewer and water, electric utilities, planning, city manager, police cheif, fire cheif, utility manager, town vehicles, management bonuses, economic development, historical planning, council and mayor pay, tree trimming etc.

They ALWAYS cut COPs and firefighters.

You watch what Obama cuts, it WILL hurt the most......
Schmahl Spew

Poland

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#26
Mar 3, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Ralph wrote:
Whatever he cuts will be done by him and he will be held accountable.
It's quite normal for Government to cut where it hurts most when they are forced to cut. Examples are towns always cut COPs and firefighters FIRST. They NEVER cut parks and rec, community centers, city hall staff, roads, sewer and water, electric utilities, planning, city manager, police cheif, fire cheif, utility manager, town vehicles, management bonuses, economic development, historical planning, council and mayor pay, tree trimming etc.
They ALWAYS cut COPs and firefighters.
You watch what Obama cuts, it WILL hurt the most......
The polls ALL show that the Republicans are taking the blame for the sequester by a considerable margin.
Ralph

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27
Mar 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Blank stare, garbage post.

Fool libertard..
Schmahl Spew

Poland

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#28
Mar 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Finally something that you know a lot about, Schmahl - blank stares and garbage posts.
Neutral Party

Louisville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29
Mar 3, 2013
 
The worst part of all of the sequester is the gloom and doom that has been coming from the President and his mouthpieces. This man is determined that if he doesn't get his way he'll make sure everyone pays for not allowing him to do whatever he wants.

Why is the media not calling him on these exaggerated claims? They are quick to make sure the comments get publicized but where is their duty of checking the facts.

And you know that every bad piece of economic news will be blamed on this and the Republicans. And the low information voter believes this crap because the media is Oblamos lap dog.
Neutral Party

Louisville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30
Mar 3, 2013
 
Schmahl Spew wrote:
<quoted text>
The polls ALL show that the Republicans are taking the blame for the sequester by a considerable margin.
This is because the Republicans don't know what to do or how to respond. In addition, the bias carried out by the media only allows for claims the liberals make to seem truthful. This is shameful that the once neutral media is now a propaganda tool for the left.
Article 3 Section 3

Ankeny, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31
Mar 4, 2013
 
Section 3 defines treason and its punishment.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
The Constitution defines treason as specific acts, namely "levying War against [the United States], or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort." A contrast is therefore maintained with the English law, whereby a variety of crimes, including conspiring to kill the King or "violating" the Queen, were punishable as treason. In Ex Parte Bollman, 8 U.S. 75 (1807), the Supreme Court ruled that "there must be an actual assembling of men, for the treasonable purpose, to constitute a levying of war."[12]

Under English law effective during the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, there were essentially five species of treason.[citation needed] Of the five, the Constitution adopted only two: levying war and adhering to enemies. Omitted were species of treason involving encompassing (or imagining) the death of the king, certain types of counterfeiting, and finally fornication with women in the royal family of the sort which could call into question the parentage of successors. James Wilson wrote the original draft of this section, and he was involved as a defense attorney for some accused of treason against the Patriot cause.

Section 3 also requires the testimony of two different witnesses on the same overt act, or a confession by the accused in open court, to convict for treason. This rule was derived from an older English statute, the Treason Act 1695.[13] In Cramer v. United States, 325 U.S. 1 (1945), the Supreme Court ruled that "[e]very act, movement, deed, and word of the defendant charged to constitute treason must be supported by the testimony of two witnesses."[14] In Haupt v. United States, 330 U.S. 631 (1947), however, the Supreme Court found that two witnesses are not required to prove intent; nor are two witnesses required to prove that an overt act is treasonable. The two witnesses, according to the decision, are required to prove only that the overt act occurred (eyewitnesses and federal agents investigating the crime, for example).

Punishment for treason may not "work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person" so convicted. The descendants of someone convicted for treason could not, as they were under English law, be considered "tainted" by the treason of their ancestor. Furthermore, Congress may confiscate the property of traitors, but that property must be inheritable at the death of the person convicted.
Article 3 Section 3

Ankeny, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#32
Mar 4, 2013
 
In Federalist No. 43 James Madison wrote regarding the Treason Clause:

As treason may be committed against the United States, the authority of the United States ought to be enabled to punish it. But as new-fangled and artificial treasons have been the great engines by which violent factions, the natural offspring of free government, have usually wreaked their alternate malignity on each other, the convention have, with great judgment, opposed a barrier to this peculiar danger, by inserting a constitutional definition of the crime, fixing the proof necessary for conviction of it, and restraining the Congress, even in punishing it, from extending the consequences of guilt beyond the person of its author.
Based on the above quoted excerpt it was noted by lawyer William J. Olson in an Amicus curiae in the case Hedges v. Obama that the Treason Clause was one of the enumerated powers of the federal government.[15] He also stated that by defining treason in the U.S. Constitution and placing it in Article III "the founders intended the power to be checked by the judiciary, ruling out trial by military commission. As Madison noted, the Treason Clause also was designed to limit the power of the federal government to punish its citizens for “adhering to [the United States’s] enemies, giving them aid and comfort.”"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Three_of ...
amused Stew

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#33
Mar 4, 2013
 
Bushwhacker wrote:
Let me know, when you DO THINK !!!
barry soetoro should be impeached on several points. this guy is like slick willie mrs teflon, nothing seems to STICK to them. Just more liberal slime, remember obiden approved the sequester in 2011, he did not want to deal with it in an election yr 2012. Now it is his mess, STOP SPENDING MONEY !
liBeRALs

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34
Mar 4, 2013
 
What you fools seem to forgoet is that the American voters soundly rejected your BS at the polls.

If you bring the same crap to the polls in 2014, you'll get the same results.
Smart Guy

Saint Paul, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35
Mar 4, 2013
 
liBeRALs wrote:
What you fools seem to forgoet is that the American voters soundly rejected your BS at the polls.
If you bring the same crap to the polls in 2014, you'll get the same results.
Obama was elected because of promises of free stuff and concessions to gays, mexicans, blacks, students, hores,

If the libs are able to promise more free stuff they will be able to once again buy votes..
LiBeRALs

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37
Mar 4, 2013
 
liBeRALs wrote:
What you fools seem to forgoet is that the American voters soundly rejected your BS at the polls.
If you bring the same crap to the polls in 2014, you'll get the same results.
it is fun watching a socialist muslim and all the liberal fools follow him off the cliff, news flash it is 2016, when your boy has to go home to kenya for good, and team obiden and billary can fight it out, that will be an easy victory for the CONSERVATIVE true American voters. Remember 58 million did not vote muslim, and we are NOT going away.
liBeRALs

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38
Mar 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

It's fun watch a right wing nut like Schahl lie his ass off and actually accomplish the OPPOSITE of what he was trying to do - he turns people TOWARDS Obama with his known lies!
Smart Guy

Saint Paul, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39
Mar 4, 2013
 
Sooo what did the Government cut first?

Oh ya, security lines at air ports..

The most affected cut they could make.
Minnesota Wild Fan

Ankeny, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40
Mar 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

Obama Hugging Putin sounds bad as well
liBeRALs

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41
Mar 4, 2013
 
Minnesota Wild Fan wrote:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.
Obama Hugging Putin sounds bad as well
What planet are you on???
DSM Local

Ankeny, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42
Mar 4, 2013
 
liBeRALs wrote:
<quoted text>
What planet are you on???
http://www.nation.com.pk/print_images/480/201...
Ralph

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#43
Mar 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Libs will use ANY mechanism to win elections.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 21 - 40 of60
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

27 Users are viewing the Minneapolis Forum right now

Search the Minneapolis Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Boycott Reid stay out of Vegas 4 min Whitewinger 7
Mpls. considers plastic food containers banMpls... 36 min Sangelia 7
Will Michelle DUMP Barak 56 min Trigger 22
What does Griddy think? 2 hr Whitewinger 5
Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 4 hr Trigger 29,896
Muslim drivers refuse to work over Gay Games ad 4 hr Ralph 2
St. Paul's pothole battle intensifies 4 hr Ralph 16
•••
•••
•••
Minneapolis Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Minneapolis Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••