Paul Ryan's make-believe budget

Posted in the Minneapolis Forum

GOP For The One Percent

Minneapolis, MN

#1 Mar 13, 2013
By Eugene Robinson, Published: March 11

If Rep. Paul Ryan wants people to take his budget manifestos seriously, he should be honest about his ambition: not so much to make the federal government fiscally sustainable as to make it smaller.

You will recall that the Ryan Budget was a big Republican selling point in last year’s election. Most famously, Ryan proposed turning Medicare into a voucher program. He offered the usual GOP recipe of tax cuts — to be offset by closing certain loopholes, which he would not specify — along with drastic reductions in non-defense “discretionary” spending.

If the plan Ryan offered had been enacted, the federal budget would not come into balance until 2040. For some reason, Republicans forgot to mention this detail in their stump speeches and campaign ads.

Voters were supposed to believe that Ryan was an apostle of fiscal rectitude. But his real aim wasn’t to balance the budget. It was to starve the federal government of revenue. Big government, in his worldview, is inherently bad — never mind that we live in an awfully big country.

Ryan and Mitt Romney offered their vision, President Obama offered his, and Americans made their choice. Rather emphatically.

Now Ryan, as chairman of the House Budget Committee, is coming back with an ostensibly new and improved version of the framework that voters rejected in November. Judging by the preview he offered Sunday, the new plan is even less grounded in reality than was the old one.

Voters might not have focused on the fact that Ryan’s original plan wouldn’t have produced a balanced budget until today’s high school students reached middle age, but the true deficit hawks in the House Republican caucus certainly noticed. They demanded a budget that reached balance much sooner. Hence Ryan’s revised plan, which claims to accomplish this feat of equilibrium within a decade.

It will, in fact, do nothing of the sort, because it appears to depend on at least one ridiculous assumption and two glaring contradictions. That’s for starters; I’m confident we’ll see more absurdities

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Thanks Black People For The Entertainment 1 hr No sympathy for T... 3
Car plows through protesters during Ferguson ra... 1 hr No sympathy for T... 5
Mpls. police: Driver who hit protester was flee... 1 hr No sympathy for T... 1
Ferguson rioters destroy businesses, police car... 1 hr Liberal Lover 27
How do I explain this to my black students? 3 hr Space ace 26
The Gentle Violent Giant 8 hr Mammie brown 3
Burn Diss Place Down 8 hr Mammie brown 9
Minneapolis Dating
Find my Match

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Minneapolis News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Minneapolis

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 10:13 am PST

NBC Sports10:13AM
Watch No. 12: Tom Brady vs Aaron Rodgers - NBC Sports
Bleacher Report11:16 AM
Complete Preview for Vikings vs. Panthers
Bleacher Report11:16 AM
Complete Preview for Vikings vs. Panthers
Bleacher Report12:07 AM
Patriots vs. Packers: Complete Week 13 Preview for Green Bay
Bleacher Report 9:00 AM
How Vikings Can Build Around Teddy in 2015 NFL Draft