Sequestration will cost 170 million jobs
LIbEralS

Blue Bell, PA

#160 Mar 12, 2013
A search of the USA Jobs federal employment website, filtered to positions in the United States and posted over the past 10 days, yielded 2,596 results.

This includes 107 positions at the Department of Homeland Security, which has claimed cutbacks have resulted in everything from a more taxing security line at airports to the need to free illegal immigrant detainees.

OUCH, the sequestration pain!
LIbEralS

Blue Bell, PA

#161 Mar 12, 2013
The latest 2012 salary figures released by the White House show 20 staffers were making the maximum $172,200.

AND

There are dozens of "deputy" assistants and "special" assistants to the president, most making six-figure salaries -- like the climate change advisers. A review of the 2012 salaries shows 139 White House staffers making $100,000 or more.

So much for cuts...
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#162 Mar 12, 2013
We are into week 2 of March, I haven't noticed green beer.... so they cancelled St Patrick's Day too, right ???

What an IDIOT ! LMAOROTFU~!

As for your titled positions, THEY'RE Presidential advisers, did you expect McMoron wages, Mac ???

What another IDIOT ! LMAOROTFU~!

Since: Sep 11

Rogers, MN

#163 Mar 12, 2013
Smart Liberal wrote:
<quoted text>
If you look at Maxine Waters record in Washington for the past 22 years, you will see that she is the joke, rather than her statement of 170 million jobs vanishing due to the Sequester.
By the way, we are now into week #2. I have not noticed any impact on the public yet, have you?
Did Obama lie to us again?
Seems we all still have jobs (except for the dynamic investment genius from Seattle), no mass layoffs here, so I guess Waters and Obama both lied.
LIbEralS

Blue Bell, PA

#164 Mar 12, 2013
Bushwhacked wrote:
We are into week 2 of March, I haven't noticed green beer.... so they cancelled St Patrick's Day too, right ???
What an IDIOT ! LMAOROTFU~!
As for your titled positions, THEY'RE Presidential advisers, did you expect McMoron wages, Mac ???
What another IDIOT ! LMAOROTFU~!
The truth hurts sometimes doesn't it?
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#165 Mar 12, 2013
You guess a lot, but obsess better... Too bad, you're a senile fool, huh ? I guess, you're 484 soon, right cantgetitup ??
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#166 Mar 12, 2013
President Barack Obama

Most recent polls for President Barack Obama:


Polling Group (Reverse Chronologically)

The poll numbers below are in this format:
Approval Disapproval +/-


RealClearPolitics.com Average[2]

February 21 - March 6, 2013

48.3% 45.8%+2.5


Gallup[3]

March 46, 2013

47% 46%+1


Rasmussen Reports[4]

March 46, 2013

51% 48%+3


Quinnipiac[5]

February 27 March 4, 2013

45% 46%1


Fox News[6]

February 2527, 2013

46% 47%1


Reason Foundation[7]

February 2125, 2013

51% 43%+8


NBC News/Wall Street Journal[8]

February 2124, 2013

50% 45%+5


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_pr...
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#167 Mar 12, 2013
non-starter wrote: I found it, you just won't publish that you got it off Yahoo or Wiki answers ....

THEN the lies began, LMAOROTFU~!

non-starter wrote: No, I guessed, because you

weren't forthcoming with your source

OR MY NEW FAVORITE-

non-starter wrote: I found similar postings on Yahoo answers and Wiki answers

You posted to the urban dictionary to support your position...It's called tampering and you're clearly a duplicitous/dishonest POS... Have a nice lie... Oh sorry, I surely meant life.
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#168 Mar 12, 2013
Bushwhacked wrote:
non-starter wrote: I found it, you just won't publish that you got it off Yahoo or Wiki answers ....
THEN the lies began, LMAOROTFU~!
non-starter wrote: No, I guessed, because you
weren't forthcoming with your source
OR MY NEW FAVORITE-
non-starter wrote: I found similar postings on Yahoo answers and Wiki answers
You posted to the urban dictionary to support your position...It's called tampering and you're clearly a duplicitous/dishonest POS... Have a nice lie... Oh sorry, I surely meant life.
Another slewpid response from the slewpid poster.

1. slewpid

Noun: Dumb to the point of ignoring factual evidence rebutting an argument. Obstinately stupid.

Adjective: To make oneself appear incredibly uneducated and obtuse, either intentionally or unintentionally.

noun: The definition from Webster's right in front of him, he was too slewpid to ascertain the meaning.

verb: The slewpid blogger didn't understand his posting invalidated his point.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php...

It is after all, your preferred source.

I noticed you ignored all the polls and the posting, and went straight to the attack, slewchebag.
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#169 Mar 12, 2013
non-starter wrote:
President
In your fantasy land, when did the position of president become a continuing popularity contest and how will your obsession/hating a black man change your miserable existence ??? Just curious, why you're happiest, being a completely unpleasant person ?
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#170 Mar 12, 2013
Bushwhacked wrote:
<quoted text>In your fantasy land, when did the position of president become a continuing popularity contest and how will your obsession/hating a black man change your miserable existence ??? Just curious, why you're happiest, being a completely unpleasant person ?
President Barack Obama

Most recent polls for President Barack Obama:

Polling Group (Reverse Chronologically)

The poll numbers below are in this format:
Approval Disapproval +/-

RealClearPolitics.com Average[2]

February 21 - March 6, 2013

48.3% 45.8%+2.5

Gallup[3]

March 46, 2013

47% 46%+1

Rasmussen Reports[4]

March 46, 2013

51% 48%+3

Quinnipiac[5]

February 27 March 4, 2013

45% 46%1

Fox News[6]

February 2527, 2013

46% 47%1

Reason Foundation[7]

February 2125, 2013

51% 43%+8

NBC News/Wall Street Journal[8]

February 2124, 2013

50% 45%+5

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_pr...

I don't hate the president because he is black.

I do not like your particular lack of style and poorly thought out arguments, but I am sure you are doing the best you can.
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#171 Mar 12, 2013
In your fantasy land, when did the position of president become a continuing popularity contest and how will your obsession/hating a black man change your miserable existence ??? Just curious, why you're happiest, being a completely unpleasant person ?
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#172 Mar 12, 2013
Ps- I'm NOT sure you're doing the "best you can", since you're barely useless.... I do appreciate your GOOG advice ...I'm up $25 per share, after ignoring YOU !!!!
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#173 Mar 12, 2013
I do not like your particular lack of style and poorly thought out arguments, but I am sure you are doing the best you can.
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#174 Mar 12, 2013
President Barack Obama

Most recent polls for President Barack Obama:

Polling Group (Reverse Chronologically)

The poll numbers below are in this format:
Approval Disapproval +/-

RealClearPolitics.com Average[2]

February 21 - March 6, 2013

48.3% 45.8%+2.5

Gallup[3]

March 46, 2013

47% 46%+1

Rasmussen Reports[4]

March 46, 2013

51% 48%+3

Quinnipiac[5]

February 27 March 4, 2013

45% 46%1

Fox News[6]

February 2527, 2013

46% 47%1

Reason Foundation[7]

February 2125, 2013

51% 43%+8

NBC News/Wall Street Journal[8]

February 2124, 2013

50% 45%+5

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_pr ...

I don't hate the president because he is black.

I do not like your particular lack of style and poorly thought out arguments, but I am sure you are doing the best you can.
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#175 Mar 12, 2013
Spamming is an improvement, but you OBVIOUSLY realized writing further stupidity wasn't working, right ??? LMAOROFU~! Good for you..........
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#176 Mar 12, 2013
Slewche, on many previous threads, you and Dumbo were arguing that Obama's high poll numbers were validation of the policies he was proposing. Now that his numbers are down, by your logic and Dumbo's, that must mean his proposed policies are garbage, right?
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#177 Mar 12, 2013
Sure, his polls and the policy polls are exactly the same, because you're an i-d-i-o-t. Take another swing at spamming, you'll improve that average...
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#178 Mar 12, 2013
Ps- Last time you said I was Dumbo, funny how "the right"...aren't at all. LMAOROTFU~! Hey, did I thank you for your stock "tips", you're my favorite contrarian indicator...
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#179 Mar 12, 2013
Best part is, his polls average more positive, so......

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Can't manage the gov & NOT honest or trustworthy (Nov '13) Tue Waikiki murders 586
Don't talk to commies Tue Waikiki murders 3
Get rough & get tough Mon Waikiki murders 2
News From reissues to reunions: What Prince fans can... Apr 24 @Real Kelly 3
#Dump Betsy Hodges! Apr 21 All libertards got 10
News Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) Apr 21 UidiotRaceMakeWor... 36,891
Happy 420! Apr 20 TruDat 2

Minneapolis Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Minneapolis Mortgages