Search and Seize Your Electronics Without Suspicion

Posted in the Minneapolis Forum

Comments
1 - 9 of 9 Comments Last updated Feb 18, 2013
DSM Local

Ankeny, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Feb 18, 2013
 
Homeland Security Approves Their Right To Search and Seize Your Electronics Without Suspicion

Four years ago, Agnieszka Gaczkowska, a 29-year-old doctor and entrepreneur from Poland, was travelling through Detroit’s airport on her way to Boston when her bag was selected for random inspection. The inspection officer asked her if she had any documents with her. Exhausted after a long journey, she replied that she did not, forgetting that she had put a few outstanding bills in one of her textbooks.

Suddenly, she found herself in serious trouble. The inspection officer found the bills and accused her of “lying to a federal officer.” They held her for two hours as she was interrogated about the details of her life. The officer ordered her to turn her phone on, and then proceeded to read her e-mails, texts, and Facebook messages without her permission. She was shocked. Eventually, Gaczkowska was released, but she wondered if this was a common practice.

As it turns out – it is; thousands of people every year face a similar situation. Our government agencies have allowed themselves the right to search and seize your electronic devices with stunning impunity.

Just two weeks ago, the Department of Homeland Security quietly released a strangely worded document reaffirming their own right to search and seize your electronics without suspicion or cause, anywhere along the United States border (which they define as 100 miles in from the border – an area twice as long as Rhode Island). In reality, this is nothing new, Homeland Security been doing this since at least 2009; That’s when Secretary Napolitano put her stamp on the Bush-era practice, and promised an impact assessment within 120 days. Over two years later, it’s finally here, and it is nothing more than a poorly written press release.

Having a government official force their way into your laptop is fundamentally different from having them inspect your suitcase. Our hard drives contain personal correspondence, intimate details, deep logs of our activities, and sensitive financial or medical information. Yet we still give this less legal privacy protection than a sealed envelope with a stamp on it.
DSM Local

Ankeny, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Feb 18, 2013
 
For now, the business community has figured out a way around having the government search and confiscate devices with company secrets – give their employees blank laptops, and put the important information in the cloud. This subject is much bigger than how Homeland Security does its job. There is a deeper issue here that is not going away any time soon: our electronics, and the data they hold, have become extensions of who we are.

The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution already provides us with protection against unreasonable search and seizures for people in their “persons, houses, papers, and effects”– is it time that we add “data” to this list?

The way in which we go about answering this question will have enormous ramifications for our entire legal system. Courts around the country are struggling to decide how to balance security with privacy. From school to the workplace, this question is popping up in different ways almost every day.

In the meantime, the government has accelerated their pursuit of our digital breadcrumbs. In 2011, mobile companies received a staggering 1.3 million law enforcement requests for data, including text messages and location information. It has been over 25 years since Ronald Reagan signed sweeping digital privacy protections into law. In today’s world of cloud computing and ubiquitous screens, these protections are horribly inadequate. We should not have to continue to rely on protections passed in an age where the Internet was a military project and the personal computer was just becoming a common thing.

Eventually, the Supreme Court will have to step in to settle the issue, and they are not exactly known for their technological expertise. It might not be long before we are asked at the airport whether we packed our own devices, if we were asked to bring anyone else’s files, and if we know if anyone has placed any data on our devices without our knowledge. At least then, it might seem polite; for now, they don’t even have to bother with the questions.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/tarunwadhwa/2013/...
DSM Local

Ankeny, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

The constitution has no bearing with the left
DSM Local Molests Kids

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The truth is out - DSM Local molests kids.
real space ace

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Feb 18, 2013
 
DSM Local Molests Kids wrote:
The truth is out - DSM Local molests kids.
Name calling/ defamation= lame tactic used after losing an argument.
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Your post has no validity to the audience, the lady lied to an officer and wasn't an American citizen... Funny, the facts that got her into trouble are unimportant to you.
Bushwhacker

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Feb 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Bushwhacked wrote:
Your post has no validity to the audience, the lady lied to an officer and wasn't an American citizen... Funny, the facts that got her into trouble are unimportant to you.
Slewsie, Slewsie, Slewsie. You know nothing about something being valid. You only know how to get fired from the Post Office. That has noting to do with this topic.
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Feb 18, 2013
 
As fired as you are sober... LMAOROTFU~!

Your post has no validity to the audience, the lady lied to an officer and wasn't an American citizen... Funny, the facts that got her into trouble are unimportant to you.
Bushwhacked

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Feb 18, 2013
 
Bushwhacked wrote:
As fired as you are sober... LMAOROTFU~!
Your post has no validity to the audience, the lady lied to an officer and wasn't an American citizen... Funny, the facts that got her into trouble are unimportant to you.
Slewsie, Slewsie, Slewsie. You know nothing about something being valid. You only know how to get fired from the Post Office. That has noting to do with this topic.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

27 Users are viewing the Minneapolis Forum right now

Search the Minneapolis Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Can't manage the gov & NOT honest or trustworthy (Nov '13) 5 min Bellweather 206
Obama wants to close the Medtronic loophole 19 min Bellweather 1
Clueless Kerry and his White House 33 min Bellweather 1
Obama administration on verge of collapse 41 min cantmakeitup 56
Woman's head stepped on by Rand Paul supporters (Oct '10) 2 hr not 26,204
Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 4 hr LIbEralS 32,087
Willernie Mayor invites 500 Central American mi... 9 hr cowboy chris 2
•••
•••
•••
•••

Minneapolis Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Minneapolis News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Minneapolis
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••