Americans yawn at budget cut hype

Posted in the Minneapolis Forum

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 5 of5
non-starter

Burnsville, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Feb 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Americans yawn at budget cut hype
By JOSH LEDERMAN | Associated Press – 3 hrs ago...
WASHINGTON (AP)— President Barack Obama is pulling out all the stops to warn just what could happen if automatic budget cuts kick in. Americans are reacting with a collective yawn.

They know the drill: Obama raises the alarm, Democrats and Republicans accuse each other of holding a deal hostage, there's a lot of yelling on cable news, and then finally, when everyone has made their points, a deal is struck and the day is saved.

Maybe not this time. Two days before $85 billion in cuts are set to hit federal programs with all the precision of a wrecking ball, there are no signs that a deal is imminent. Even the White House conceded Wednesday that efforts to avoid the cuts were unlikely to succeed before they kick in on Friday.

Still, for all the grim predictions, Americans seem to be flipping the channel to something a little less, well, boring. They wonder, haven't we been here before?

Texas native Corby Biddle, 53, isn't losing sleep over the cuts. No way the government will let vital services collapse, he said as he visited tourist attractions in downtown Atlanta.

"It will get resolved. They will kick the can down the road," Biddle said.

Usually, that's exactly what happens. Even the cuts behind the current panic were originally supposed to kick in on Jan. 1 — part of the fiscal-cliff combo of spending cuts and tax hikes that economists warned could nudge the nation back into recession. For all the high drama, lawmakers finally acted on New Year's Day, compromising on taxes and punting the spending cuts to March 1.

And the blunt instrument known as the "sequester" that's set to deliver the cuts? That too was the progeny of another moment of government-by-brinksmanship, a concession that in 2011 made possible the grand bargain that saved the U.S. from a first-ever default on its debt.

Even if the current cuts go through, the impact won't be immediate. Federal workers would be notified next week that they will have to take up to a day every week off without pay, but the furloughs won't start for a month due to notification requirements. That will give negotiators some breathing room to keep working on a deal.

But you can only cry wolf so many times before people just stop paying attention.

"I know you guys must get tired of it," Obama told a crowd in Virginia on Tuesday. "Didn't we just solve this thing? Now we've got another thing coming up?"

Three out of 4 Americans say they aren't following the spending cuts issue very closely, according to a Pew Research Center poll released this week. It's a significant drop from the nearly 4 in 10 who in December said they were closely following the fiscal-cliff debate.

Public data from Google's search engine shows that at its peak in December, the search term "fiscal cliff" was about 10 times as popular as "sequestration" has been in recent days. Even "debt ceiling," not a huge thriller for the web-surfing crowd, maxed out in July 2011 at about three times the searches the sequester is now getting.

"We're now approaching the next alleged deadline of doom. And voters, having been told previously that the world might end, found it did not in the past and are becoming more skeptical that it will in the future," said Peter Brown of the nonpartisan Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.

And let's face it: When it comes to policy issues that can really put an audience to sleep, "sequestration" is right up there with filibuster reform, chained CPI and carried interest.

For all the angst about layoffs, furloughs and slashes to government contracts, the markets don't seem to be rattled, either. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, after falling below 13,000 at the height of the fiscal cliff debacle, has been buoyant ever since, spending the last month hovering just below 14,000.
non-starter

Burnsville, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Feb 27, 2013
 
"I shrug my shoulders because I don't believe any of those severe cuts will go through," said Karen Jensen, a retired hospital administrator who stopped to talk in New York's Times Square. "Life goes on as it has before."

But if the Obama administration hasn't managed to convince Americans these spending cuts could be the real deal, it's not for lack of trying.

Each day the cuts grow nearer sees a new dire warning from the White House about another government function that will take a hit if they go into effect — what White House chief of staff Denis McDonough has called a "devastating list of horribles." The White House has even compiled and circulated 51 reports — one for each state, plus the District of Columbia — showing how the cuts could harm local communities.

Education Secretary Arne Duncan said Wednesday that up to 40,000 teachers could lose their jobs. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has warned that her agency will be forced to furlough 5,000 border patrol agents. Fewer air traffic controllers could mean 90-minute delays or longer in major cities, and visiting hours at all 398 national parks are likely to be cut, the administration has said.

"The president needs to stop campaigning, stop trying to scare the American people, stop trying to scare the states," Republican Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana said this week after governors from both parties met with Obama behind closed doors. "Now's the time to cut spending. It can be done without jeopardizing the economy. It can be done without jeopardizing critical services."

The age-old Republican desire for a scaled-back federal government makes it clear why, on the one hand, the GOP isn't scrambling to avert the cuts — especially when Obama insists on more tax revenues in any deal to turn them off. On the other hand, Obama is banking on polls that show if the cuts go through, Republicans are likely to bear most of the blame.

Both parties agree that if you're going to cut spending, an indiscriminate mechanism like the sequester is the wrong way to do it. After all, the whole point of the endeavor was to set in motion ramifications so unbearable that lawmakers would be forced to come together and hash out a better plan before the deadline.

Count James Ford of Louisville, Ky., among those still holding out hope.

"They'll come up with something to keep the thing going," he said. "They always do."

___

Associated Press writers Jeff Martin in Atlanta, Jake Pearson in New York and Dylan Lovan in Louisville, Ky., contributed to this report.
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Feb 27, 2013
 
The debate over Friday's looming sequester is getting more ferocious as President Obama and congressional Republicans blame each other for the $85 billion in budget cuts due to take effect at the end of this week.

A new poll finds that a plurality of Americans is still on Obama's side. Forty-five percent say they would hold the GOP responsible while only 32 percent would blame Obama if the cuts are triggered, according to a survey by the Pew Research Center and The Washington Post. Thirteen percent say both sides would be equally to blame.

This represents some slippage in Obama's position since late December, during the last big budget debate, when 53 percent would have blamed Republicans for a stalemate and 27 percent would have faulted Obama. A last-minute deal delayed the budget confrontation until this week.

[READ: Alan Simpson:'It Is a Sad Thing to Watch']

Obama plans to underscore what he calls GOP intransigence Tuesday afternoon when he speaks at Newport News Shipbuilding in Virginia, which helps to maintain Navy vessels.

Obama says such facilities would suffer harmful cuts if the sequester—a series of automatic budget reductions—goes through. He adds that the sequester would harm many other important and popular programs across the country, and argues that the GOP wants to obstruct progress in order to protect the rich and big corporations.

Obama favors a combination of targeted spending reductions and higher taxes; the Republicans want only spending cuts.

GOP leaders say tax increases won't help the economy or create jobs. They have urged Obama to stop campaigning against them around the country, and instead stay in Washington to find a compromise.

[RELATED: Administration Lays Out Pending Cuts by State]

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell issued a statement Tuesday that, "The president had more than a year and a half to revisit his proposal and work with us to prevent [sequestration]. He obviously thought his time and energies were better spent elsewhere. In fact, today he's off campaigning again in Virginia, instead of working with us to resolve the issue."

The sequester was created by Obama and Congress to set up a budget crisis that was thought to be so severe that legislators and the administration wouldn't let it happen. But there has been little or no movement toward compromise so far.
Bushwhacker

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Feb 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Slewsie dear, you are so right. Who cares about some stupid budget? It is rich rethuglicants that are going to pay for all my free stuff anyways. I loves my Obamaphone. Thank you all you rethuglicants! Kisses.
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Feb 27, 2013
 
The debate over Friday's looming sequester is getting more ferocious as President Obama and congressional Republicans blame each other for the $85 billion in budget cuts due to take effect at the end of this week.

A new poll finds that a plurality of Americans is still on Obama's side. Forty-five percent say they would hold the GOP responsible while only 32 percent would blame Obama if the cuts are triggered, according to a survey by the Pew Research Center and The Washington Post. Thirteen percent say both sides would be equally to blame.

This represents some slippage in Obama's position since late December, during the last big budget debate, when 53 percent would have blamed Republicans for a stalemate and 27 percent would have faulted Obama. A last-minute deal delayed the budget confrontation until this week.

[READ: Alan Simpson:'It Is a Sad Thing to Watch']

Obama plans to underscore what he calls GOP intransigence Tuesday afternoon when he speaks at Newport News Shipbuilding in Virginia, which helps to maintain Navy vessels.

Obama says such facilities would suffer harmful cuts if the sequester—a series of automatic budget reductions—goes through. He adds that the sequester would harm many other important and popular programs across the country, and argues that the GOP wants to obstruct progress in order to protect the rich and big corporations.

Obama favors a combination of targeted spending reductions and higher taxes; the Republicans want only spending cuts.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 5 of5
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

8 Users are viewing the Minneapolis Forum right now

Search the Minneapolis Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 1 hr litesong 31,993
Welfare Cash for Weed in Colorado 4 hr cantmakeitup 1
liberal war on women (Jul '13) 4 hr Earl 78
Obamacare subsidies illegal 4 hr beckmans 5
Rick perry sends national guard to border 4 hr Earl Brown 4
Young Men of Color Need More Than Basketball an... 9 hr cantmakeitup 5
Where's Kluwe? 9 hr Sam Ollie 3
•••
•••
•••
Minneapolis Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Minneapolis Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Minneapolis News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Minneapolis
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••