The Hitler gun control lie
Posted in the Minneapolis Forum
#1 Jan 12, 2013
This week, people were shocked when the Drudge Report posted a giant picture of Hitler over a headline speculating that the White House will proceed with executive orders to limit access to firearms. The proposed orders are exceedingly tame, but Drudges reaction is actually a common conservative response to any invocation of gun control.
The NRA, Fox News, Fox News (again), Alex Jones, email chains, Joe the Plumber Wurzelbacher, Gun Owners of America, etc., all agree that gun control was critical to Hitlers rise to power. Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (Americas most aggressive defender of firearms ownership) is built almost exclusively around this notion, popularizing posters of Hitler giving the Nazi salute next to the text:All in favor of gun control raise your right hand.
In his 1994 book, NRA head Wayne LaPierre dwelled on the Hitler meme at length, writing:In Germany, Jewish extermination began with the Nazi Weapon Law of 1938, signed by Adolf Hitler.
And it makes a certain amount of intuitive sense: If youre going to impose a brutal authoritarian regime on your populace, better to disarm them first so they cant fight back.
Unfortunately for LaPierre et al., the notion that Hitler confiscated everyones guns is mostly bogus. And the ancillary claim that Jews could have stopped the Holocaust with more guns doesnt make any sense at all if you think about it for more than a minute.
University of Chicago law professor Bernard Harcourt explored this myth in depth in a 2004 article published in the Fordham Law Review. As it turns out, the Weimar Republic, the German government that immediately preceded Hitlers, actually had tougher gun laws than the Nazi regime. After its defeat in World War I, and agreeing to the harsh surrender terms laid out in the Treaty of Versailles, the German legislature in 1919 passed a law that effectively banned all private firearm possession, leading the government to confiscate guns already in circulation. In 1928, the Reichstag relaxed the regulation a bit, but put in place a strict registration regime that required citizens to acquire separate permits to own guns, sell them or carry them.
The 1938 law signed by Hitler that LaPierre mentions in his book basically does the opposite of what he says it did.The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as well as ammunition, Harcourt wrote. Meanwhile, many more categories of people, including Nazi party members, were exempted from gun ownership regulations altogether, while the legal age of purchase was lowered from 20 to 18, and permit lengths were extended from one year to three years.
The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general. Does the fact that Nazis forced Jews into horrendous ghettos indict urban planning? Should we eliminate all police officers because the Nazis used police officers to oppress and kill the Jews? What about public works Hitler loved public works projects? Of course not. These are merely implements that can be used for good or ill, much as gun advocates like to argue about guns themselves. If guns dont kill people, then neither does gun control cause genocide (genocidal regimes cause genocide).
Add your comments below
|Can't manage the gov & NOT honest or trustworthy (Nov '13)||20 hr||LIbEralS||560|
|Definition of Liberal||Wed||cantmakeitup||1|
|Trump is Totally Unqualified||Oct 18||Honor Student||5|
|Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10)||Oct 17||Honor Student||35,583|
|Chelsea Clinton rallies the faithful in Twin Ci... (Feb '16)||Oct 15||Stop Sr Discrimin...||49|
|Bill clinton a rapist but liberals excuse it.||Oct 14||huh||27|
Find what you want!
Search Minneapolis Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC