Should Drones be Banned on U.S. Soil

Should Drones be Banned on U.S. Soil

Created by 1776 Defender on May 23, 2013

1 vote

Click on an option to vote

Yes protect and uphold our Fourth Amendment Rights

No, unrestrained use on the streets in the USA

Only with a warrant

Warrant & High Risk (ex. Terrorist attack)

I don't know / Undecided

1776 Defender

Ankeny, IA

#1 May 23, 2013
Holder admits drones killed 4 Americans, Rand Paul crafts legislation
a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy Wednesday, Attorney General Eric Holder reveals counterterrorism drone strikes have killed four Americans overseas since 2009. This is the first time the administration has acknowledged that the United States specifically targeted and killed an American citizen.

Al-Qaida cleric Anwar al-Awlaki was killed in 2011 in Yemen, when it was alleged he was plotting attacks against the U.S. Holder also said the Obama administration knew of three other Americans who had been killed in overseas counterterrorism operations, but that they had not been specifically targeted
Also on Wednesday, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., introduced a bill to protect against unwarranted governmental intrusion through the use of drones.

The Preserving Freedom from Unwarranted Surveillance Act is meant to protect a citizen’s right to personal privacy as the use of drones continues to expand throughout the government.

“The use of drone surveillance may work on the battlefields overseas, but it isn’t well-suited for unrestrained use on the streets in the United States,” Paul said in a statement.“Congress must be vigilant in providing oversight to the use of this technology and protection for rights of the American people. I will continue the fight to protect and uphold our Fourth Amendment.”

The measure will prohibit the use of government drones for evidence collection unless a warrant has been obtained, and rules evidence as inadmissible if this requirement is violated. Exceptions listed are use in patrolling national borders, when there is imminent danger to life, or in the case of a high risk of a terrorist attack. ...
Idaho got it done

Ankeny, IA

#2 May 23, 2013
Idaho Supports Fourth Amendment, Enacts Drone Restrictions
Another state is stepping in and shielding its citizens from constant surveillance by the government or law enforcement.

On April 11, Idaho Governor C.L.“Butch” Otter signed into law the “Preserving Freedom From Unwanted Surveillance Act,” an act reinforcing the Fourth Amendment’s guarantee of “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.”

The law amends the Idaho code, placing new restrictions on the use of drones by government or law enforcement, particularly when it comes to the gathering of evidence and surveillance of private property.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
minorities 1 hr cowboy chris 3
News Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 2 hr don t drink the k... 35,586
Sick hillary 3 hr LIbEralS 27
Definition of Liberal 15 hr Family 2
Can't manage the gov & NOT honest or trustworthy (Nov '13) Thu LIbEralS 560
Wikileaks highlights Oct 19 LIbEralS 35
Trump is Totally Unqualified Oct 18 Honor Student 5

Minneapolis Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Minneapolis Mortgages