American History Textbooks For Revolting Patriots
Posted in the Minneapolis Forum
#1 Jul 7, 2013
Sundays With The Christianists: American History Textbooks For Revolting Patriots
Fresh on the heels of Americas Bestest Holiday, its time for another delightful visit to the world of Christianist textbooks, and as it turns out, theyre talkin about a Revolution, too. As weve noted in some of our earlier visits to wingnut history books, the editors of these books tend to be fairly straightforward when it comes to military history, and the American Revolution is no different. Both of our samples, the 8th grade America: Land I Love (A Beka Book, 1994) and the 11th-12th grade U.S. History For Christian Schools (Bob Jones University Press, 2001), present the conflicts and events of the period in terms that wouldnt be out of place in a secular textbook theres no idiocy about God helping out the colonial forces with a bunch of miracles, for instance. Its as if once the editors have some actual war-making to talk about, they feel free to set aside the Culture War thats at the heart of the books agenda.
Still, there are subtle differences. Where a secular text might note that colonial anti-Catholic paranoia was stoked by the 1774 Quebec Act, which established Catholicism as the provinces official religion, Land I Love suggests that Colonial propagandists had it right:
For years, colonists had feared that an Anglican bishop might be sent to America to dictate their religious affairs, but now the Quebec Act brought about an even worse fear for the future of religious liberty the fear of being ruled by the pope.
Land I Love also puts a Reagan-era spin on colonial gripes over taxation, suggesting that Prime Minister William Pitt sought to pursue a 1760s version of supply-side economics (he planned to lift trade restrictions on the colonies to boost private enterprise and thus increase the amount of tax money sent to Britain) while Chancellor of the Exchequer Charles Townshend was some kind of 18th century Ted Kennedy who believed that the colonies should pay what he considered their fair share of taxes to the Crown. Since both texts date from the days before America had to be taken back from the Kenyan Usurper, the Boston Tea Party is mentioned only as an anti-British act, and both texts are careful to note that the colonists felt just awful about destroying private property, but they had to in order to make their point.
Read more at http://wonkette.com/521973/sundays-with-the-c...
Read more at http://wonkette.com/#3x7xjYl4eZuts8JI.99
Add your comments below
|the NON affordable care act (Oct '13)||17 hr||Obama the best||279|
|Can't manage the gov & NOT honest or trustworthy (Nov '13)||Aug 20||Phineas||523|
|Welcome To Minnesota Mr. Trump||Aug 20||LIbEralS||3|
|Prison sentence for notable defense attorney Sa... (May '11)||Aug 19||Post them||19|
|Obama paid Ransom for Hostages to Iran||Aug 19||achtung RAPHAN||8|
|Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10)||Aug 17||Too Funny||35,567|
|Did Ilhan Omar marry her Brother ?||Aug 15||cowboy chris||2|
Find what you want!
Search Minneapolis Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC