i should be allowed to marry anyone i love

Posted in the Minneapolis Forum

Comments
1 - 20 of 72 Comments Last updated Apr 6, 2013
First Prev
of 4
Next Last
thinkprogress

Minneapolis, MN

#1 Mar 26, 2013
Incest and polygamy is the next constitutional hurdle we must overcome to bring equality to everyone who pursues happiness.
well

Minneapolis, MN

#2 Mar 26, 2013
thinkprogress wrote:
Incest and polygamy is the next constitutional hurdle we must overcome to bring equality to everyone who pursues happiness.
a dog?

i'm loving my dog, ok?
digger

Saint Paul, MN

#3 Mar 26, 2013
Sodom, it's well recorded. Forget it, and reap the consequences....
thinkprogress

Minneapolis, MN

#4 Mar 26, 2013
well wrote:
<quoted text>
a dog?
i'm loving my dog, ok?
A dog wouldn't be considered a person legally.

If 2 or more consenting adults want to legally marry....
why should I be prohibited?

Why is marriage bound to two people only?

As soon as gays are allowed to marry. By a federal ruling.
I see no reasons why incest and polygamy should not be legally allowed.

If I want to marry my sisters or brothers....

What moral reasoning do you have to oppose my wishes ?
thinkprogress

Minneapolis, MN

#5 Mar 26, 2013
If no moral or ethical reasons exist to prohibit gay marriage...

No moral or ethical reasons exist to prohibit incest or polygamy.

Love is love right?

Why should polygamists be deprived of the same rights gays and straight couples have?

What legal reasoning do you have to oppose polygamy when gays can marry?

Where does it say in the constitution polygamy is unconstitutional?

If I want to have 6 wives..we all love each other
Why should 5 of them be deprived of the legal protection of being my wife?
thinkprogress

Minneapolis, MN

#6 Mar 26, 2013
And please don't give me the reason "majority" disapproves.

Prop 8 was voted into law by the majority.
Supreme court has power to over rule majority. Asked to do so by minority.

Therefore when same sex marriage is federally protected...if that happens...

I see no moral, ethical, LEGAL reasons to oppose polygamy or marriage between siblings or family members.
thinkprogress

Minneapolis, MN

#7 Mar 26, 2013
Just need gays to redefine marriage.

Redefining marriage will have lasting impact on the lives of people who love one another.

Maybe one of my wives will give birth to my future wife.

I cant wait til gays pave the way for a happier future.
read the Bible

Minneapolis, MN

#8 Mar 27, 2013
thinkprogress wrote:
<quoted text>
A dog wouldn't be considered a person legally.
If 2 or more consenting adults want to legally marry....
why should I be prohibited?
Why is marriage bound to two people only?
As soon as gays are allowed to marry. By a federal ruling.
I see no reasons why incest and polygamy should not be legally allowed.
If I want to marry my sisters or brothers....
What moral reasoning do you have to oppose my wishes ?
BECAUSE IT IS A SIN -
IT WILL ALWAYS BE A SIN -
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#9 Mar 27, 2013
thinkprogress wrote:
<quoted text>
A dog wouldn't be considered a person legally.
If 2 or more consenting adults want to legally marry....
why should I be prohibited?
Why is marriage bound to two people only?
As soon as gays are allowed to marry. By a federal ruling.
I see no reasons why incest and polygamy should not be legally allowed.
If I want to marry my sisters or brothers....
What moral reasoning do you have to oppose my wishes ?
Same reason as before, a healthy progeny. Why do you ask stupid questions, are you "simple" ?
well

Minneapolis, MN

#10 Mar 27, 2013
thinkprogress wrote:
<quoted text>
A dog wouldn't be considered a person legally.
If 2 or more consenting adults want to legally marry....
why should I be prohibited?
Why is marriage bound to two people only?
As soon as gays are allowed to marry. By a federal ruling.
I see no reasons why incest and polygamy should not be legally allowed.
If I want to marry my sisters or brothers....
What moral reasoning do you have to oppose my wishes ?
don't need a moral reason

if 100 years ago all humans were gay none of us would be here today

interfamily reproduction leads to west va retardation

gays life expectancy is on average 50 years not sustainable gay sex is very dangerous

marriage is a religious institution, seperation of church and state limits government intervention in religious affairs

government passes all kinds of laws to protect "people" from their own actions

just because 2 men like corn whole sex that doesn't mean they should be allowed to marry and raise someone elses kids

just because 2 women like to have sex it doesn't mean they should be allowed to raise someone elses kids

gayism is not sustainable, not normal in God's eyes

there is no need for 2 same gender adults to be married in order to live their perverted/abnormal lifestyle NONE!!!!

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#11 Mar 27, 2013
It has nothing to do with "love". While that maybe the guise used, the lawsuit filed is about the money!! The fact a “partner” was forced to pay a huge estate tax is the reason this issue has reached the Supreme Court. It has everything to do with the financial benefits the law has established for those legally married versus those whose union is not recognized by the Federal Government. If the Feds recognized “civil unions” and granted all the privileges currently enjoyed by those “legally” married, one would think that would end the battle, right????
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#12 Mar 27, 2013
well wrote:
<quoted text>
don't need a moral reason
if 100 years ago all humans were gay none of us would be here today
interfamily reproduction leads to west va retardation
gays life expectancy is on average 50 years not sustainable gay sex is very dangerous
marriage is a religious institution, seperation of church and state limits government intervention in religious affairs
government passes all kinds of laws to protect "people" from their own actions
just because 2 men like corn whole sex that doesn't mean they should be allowed to marry and raise someone elses kids
just because 2 women like to have sex it doesn't mean they should be allowed to raise someone elses kids
gayism is not sustainable, not normal in God's eyes
there is no need for 2 same gender adults to be married in order to live their perverted/abnormal lifestyle NONE!!!!
Love your "spelling", it matches the stupidity of your "argument" and "intelligence"...
Awful Truth

Grantsburg, WI

#13 Mar 27, 2013
"interfamily reproduction leads to west va retardation"

And Seattle Sociopaths, as well as St Paul Ebonics Poster and Posters of Many Names!

These Freaks of Humanity were BORN, unlike most Victims who are created in Government Schools.
well

Minneapolis, MN

#14 Mar 27, 2013
Bushwhacker wrote:
<quoted text>Love your "spelling", it matches the stupidity of your "argument" and "intelligence"...
Oh yes YOU may marry your hand, your choice of course.

Its name "Rosy Palm" of course.
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#15 Mar 27, 2013
Awful Truth wrote:
"interfamily reproduction leads to west va retardation"
And Seattle Sociopaths, as well as St Paul Ebonics Poster and Posters of Many Names!
These Freaks of Humanity were BORN, unlike most Victims who are created in Government Schools.
Yeah, we see you freak....

Have another toot !
Awful Truth

Grantsburg, WI

#16 Mar 27, 2013
Niether of the Above wrote:
It has nothing to do with "love". While that maybe the guise used, the lawsuit filed is about the money!! The fact a “partner” was forced to pay a huge estate tax is the reason this issue has reached the Supreme Court. It has everything to do with the financial benefits the law has established for those legally married versus those whose union is not recognized by the Federal Government. If the Feds recognized “civil unions” and granted all the privileges currently enjoyed by those “legally” married, one would think that would end the battle, right????
The Narcissistic Hedonists of the Demokrat Victims Branch of Deviant Homosexuals DEMAND to be "Embraced" not just "Accepted".

It is a part of their condition, and being "Recognized" is what every defect seeks.

Look at the Homosexual Deviant Seattle Sociopath. Every stupid disconnected post she poisons with is only about "LOOK AT MEEEEEEEE!"

Why is it good for Humanity to encourage defects like Slewsie and Company?
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#18 Mar 27, 2013
When you write like you do, I appreciate your support....
PHD2

Minneapolis, MN

#19 Mar 27, 2013
Awful Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
The Narcissistic Hedonists of the Demokrat Victims Branch of Deviant Homosexuals DEMAND to be "Embraced" not just "Accepted".
It is a part of their condition, and being "Recognized" is what every defect seeks.
Look at the Homosexual Deviant Seattle Sociopath. Every stupid disconnected post she poisons with is only about "LOOK AT MEEEEEEEE!"
Why is it good for Humanity to encourage defects like Slewsie and Company?
Seattle is a fraggg..
PHD2

Saint Paul, MN

#20 Mar 27, 2013
Awful Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
The Narcissistic Hedonists of the Demokrat Victims Branch of Deviant Homosexuals DEMAND to be "Embraced" not just "Accepted".
It is a part of their condition, and being "Recognized" is what every defect seeks.
Look at the Homosexual Deviant Seattle Sociopath. Every stupid disconnected post she poisons with is only about "LOOK AT MEEEEEEEE!"
Why is it good for Humanity to encourage defects like Slewsie and Company?
Thanks for sharing your feelings with us buddy. I hope you have a better day today. I'll send someone out later to check on you.
thinkprogress

Minneapolis, MN

#22 Mar 27, 2013
Whether a couple can reproduce has no validity. Legally speaking.
Women are not restricted from marriage when post menopause.

Especially when gays are allowed to marry. Gay couples cant reproduce.

Argument for gay marriage is equal rights and loving committed consenting adults.
If that is the rational and we define marriage to that rational....

WHAT LEGAL, ETHICAL, OR MORAL REASONS DO YOU GAY MARRIAGE SUPPORTERS HAVE TO OPPOSE POLYGAMY OR INCESTUAL MARRIAGES?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Rams cut Sam, 1st openly gay player drafted 10 min Butch 2
Abbott Northwestern Hospital any good? 1 hr Elizabeth 16
DHS considering new security measures to interc... 2 hr Wendall 5
Obama: "no strategy" on Isis. 2 hr Wendall 10
No mention of radical Islam in FBI threat report 2 hr Herb 2
Minneapolis: A Hotbed For Radical Islam 2 hr Herb 70
ISIS eyes Mexican border, says bulletin 3 hr Herb 7
•••
•••
Minneapolis Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Minneapolis Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Minneapolis News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Minneapolis
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••