Global warming 'undeniable,' scientis...

Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say

There are 35577 comments on the TwinCities.com story from Jul 29, 2010, titled Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say. In it, TwinCities.com reports that:

Scientists from around the world are providing even more evidence of global warming, one day after President Barack Obama renewed his call for climate legislation.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at TwinCities.com.

LessHypeMoreFact

Etobicoke, Canada

#28671 Aug 4, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
There is a severe case of denier rash. The rash is rendering their posts trashy.
Good grief.
One can hardly expect much more when you are talking to zoned out right wingers that post political blogs in rebuttal to science articles. It defines them as anti-science and incapable of understanding the reality.
The Integral

Hilo, HI

#28672 Aug 4, 2013
EXPERT wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me know when you are old enough to present your own argument rather on hiding behind links to avoid any accountable position.
bye-bye now
Of course you didn't read the article. If you had, you would have to admit that you are completely incorrect.

If you need it explained to you - which you seem to - ice cores go back as 740,000 years.

Ice cores provide the most direct and highly resolved records of (especially) atmospheric parameters over these timescales. They record climate signals, as well as forcing factors of global significance such as greenhouse gases and of more regional significance such as atmospheric aerosol content.

That's the difference between you and me. I base what I say on solid references. You are from the PIDOOMA school of "science".
The Integral

Hilo, HI

#28673 Aug 4, 2013
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>hurricane season should be very usual this year and probably subdued due to eastern atlantic cooling. what say you?
For the six-month hurricane season, which begins June 1, NOAA’s Atlantic Hurricane Season Outlook says there is a 70 percent likelihood of 13 to 20 named storms (winds of 39 mph or higher), of which 7 to 11 could become hurricanes (winds of 74 mph or higher), including 3 to 6 major hurricanes (Category 3, 4 or 5; winds of 111 mph or higher).

http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2013/2013...

“I'm Hillary's Deplorable”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#28674 Aug 4, 2013
Still no experimental test of climate change mitigation or the effect of man made greenhouse gas on climate?

Climate change mitigation is still a hoax and man made catastrophic climate change alarmism is pseudoscience.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#28676 Aug 5, 2013
The Integral wrote:
<quoted text>
For the six-month hurricane season, which begins June 1, NOAA’s Atlantic Hurricane Season Outlook says there is a 70 percent likelihood of 13 to 20 named storms (winds of 39 mph or higher), of which 7 to 11 could become hurricanes (winds of 74 mph or higher), including 3 to 6 major hurricanes (Category 3, 4 or 5; winds of 111 mph or higher).
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2013/2013...
an average season. It's just weather as usual.
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N0G31...

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#28678 Aug 5, 2013
Bushwhacker wrote:
An average rat post. No intelligence or point, as usual. YOu competing with me ?? Hardly har har...
are you talking to me, son? Lol. If so, no, I'm not competing with you. When it comes to rat posts with intelligence or point....YOU'RE in a class by yourself.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#28679 Aug 5, 2013
You're the "smartest" poster here, bushwhacked .

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#28680 Aug 5, 2013
Why are you constantly on topix with a mind like yours?

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#28681 Aug 5, 2013
Why don't you give the forum the scoop on your next big trade since nobody was on that other thread when you gave the tip. We could all be rich like you!!!!!!

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#28683 Aug 5, 2013
Okay, fairy tale time is over for today. Go get a pb&j Sammy, mullet, then go draw for a while.

Judged:

18

18

18

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#28686 Aug 5, 2013
Bushwhacker wrote:
Yep, I have intelligence & money & and you're pointless & funny. Poor rat, just a loser panting behind the big dogs....
i bet your wealth and intellect are only surpassed by your humility, right? Lol

Judged:

17

16

16

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#28688 Aug 5, 2013
Bushwhacker wrote:
Same guy who said I can't invest, right rat ???
Really sad, you're such a twit. LMAOROFU~!
you can invest? Wow! Does that mean you like or hate t strips now? Heehee
Can you tell me the current yield on 5 years, please? I'm sure a smart, rich, "investor" like you knows that stuff from the top of his head.

Judged:

14

14

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#28694 Aug 5, 2013
Bushwhacker wrote:
Like I'll continue to say, we take turns.
Nobody likes the company of a child who doesn't know how to share or take turns.
I told you how many shares, now you tell me your +20% stock pick, this month or admit you're a mouthy moron...
Now GO ahead, coward.... prove you HAVE WORTH.
i already did that. I gave you instructions on how you could do the same, but you got short squeezed, penny stock.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Kyle

Columbia City, IN

#28695 Aug 5, 2013
Well, well, well, looks like the denier scum have been busy being scummy. Let’s look at how true to form they’ve been:

What’s Angered American done to advance science today?

1) I made the simple observation that his political rant was irrelevant to the validity of science. His response was another political rant.

2) He repeated retarded denier fallacy argument #2 (It’s cold somewhere,…) for the billionth time. Most impressive.

3) He then posted yet another political rant. Shocking, eh?

4) He employs Argumentum ad Populum Fallacy (“Millions arent buying the Agenda...”) as if the denial industry’s successful duping were evidence inre: the science.(face->palm)

5) When SpaceBlues even destroyed the basis of his particular usage of retarded denier fallacy argument #2, he responded with ... wait for it ... a link to another political argument.(I’m embarrassed FOR this moron)

6) In a response to riteupbriang’srectum, he levels a vague, bare assertion that the science is all llies. IOW, he explicitly adopts the conspiracy theorist banner.

7) He then posts a link to ... you guessed it.

8) The Integral deflated the “no warming since 1998” lie with the facts that anyone who thinks they’re equipped to debate GW should already know (yet no denier admits to knowing or is capable of acknowledging). He didn’t even respond; instead he posted a link to ... what a worthless f@%knugget!

Maybe Expert did better. Let’s see:
1) I had asked him how far back he thought the historical record of CO2 levels went and why he thought so (because he denied the science). SpaceBlues posted links to massive, organized repositories of summarized science with links to the primary sources. Expert dismissed it all with a flip insult.

2) He responds to my question by ... not responding at all; he merely hurled a childish insult,“called BS” on the science again, and gave a figure of 100,000 yrs while ignoring the request to explain why he thinks so. I suspect rectal extraction.

3) He comments again,“calls BS” again, invokes his figure again, gives no reason for it – again.

4) The Integral posts a link directly to the primary SCIENCE that shows that I’m correct. He (snicker) dismisses the primary source (peer reviewed in a top journal) with the RETARDED excuse that The Integral was “hiding behind links to avoid any accountable position.”! What a transparent DENIAL move!

5) The Integral spells out the facts from the SCIENCE.“EXPERT” disappears, thereby keeping the denier scum record of never admitting to any error or defeat intact.

6)“EXPERT” also disappeared without ever even acknowledging that his false dichotomy* was RETARDED. That’s the intellectual integrity we all have come to expect from denier scum.

*” So is your position that the Earth is fine tuned to support life and if the climate average increases then life will not be able to adapt to that change? Or do you hold the position that natural selection, random mutations and adaptation determine the evolution of life?”

(to be continued)

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Kyle

Columbia City, IN

#28696 Aug 5, 2013
(continued)

Did Sunny fair better than the other scumsuckers?:

1) In response to me pointing out that he had just effectively conceded an argument by failing to acknowledge its refutation, he went off on a long-winded deliberate non-sequitur, sprinkled in some insults, and deliberately misspelled my name – in all caps – twice. Very compelling argument.(eyes rolling)

2) He made a comment inre: my question for EXPERT that was nothing but a childish insult.

3) He made a comment inre: my explanation of why EXPERT had posed a question based on a grossly illogical premise with ... another childish insult - only.

4) He responded to SpaceBlues pointing out that he was ignoring SCIENCE that was posted with “Hi I don't care thanks.” Another transparent DENIAL move by another transparent denier.

What are the odds that ritedownthemiddle has ceased to be the least honest person on the planet?:

1) He also commented inre: my explanation of why EXPERT had posed a question based on a grossly illogical premise with ... another childish insult - only. He could have ignored it. Clearly, it pisses him off when a denier fallacy or lie is revealed, even if it wasn’t his. Clearly, the truth is the last thing he cares about; why else would he defend a gross fallacy? Very badly, I might add.

2) He posted – in response to no one or any recent point – dumbazz denier fallacy #1, as if it had ever been revealed as being RETARDED.

3) He finishes this comment with a vague, bare assertion of the science being all lies, and thereby also donning the banner of conspiracy theorist.

4) He comments in response to SpaceBlues posting SCIENCE for the sole purpose of dismissing it with an insult.

5) He responded to The Integral’s thorough debunking of a very common denier lie by ignoring it completely and changing the subject to something so completely out of the blue that we were all subject to whiplash. How intellectually dishonest is that?

6) He (I truly believe in a deliberate attempt to bury denier implosions under mountains of BS) exchanges several infantile, insulting, off-topic comments with bushwacker.

Nope, ritedownthemiddle has only been slimy old ritedownthemiddle; no miracles today. What’s this? Could it be Brian_G? He only seems to crop up when ritedownthemiddle is imploding. And he usually posts the same retarded Argument from Consequences with no acknowledgement that it’s obvious nonsense because it cannot possibly have any bearing on the validity of the science of GW.

No prizes will be given for guessing the content of Lyin’ Brian’s comment.

What did I say to you worthless wastes of flesh? AGAIN FOR THE HARD OF THINKING:

“OK, denier scum. You regulars need to address the refutations of your BS in your very next posts. No repetitions of the BS without acknowledging them. Anything less is tantamount to an admission that the facts aren't on your side and you're engaged in willful ignorance.”

... SNIP ...

You know, just ANYTHING that's actually a fact based and rational argument.

Or just STFU and stop embarrassing yourselves. I'd suggest that you might admit your errors and accept the objective facts, but monkeys will fly out of your butt before you'll develop that level of intellectual integrity."

D_O__Y_O_U__U_N_D_E_R_S_T_A_N_ D_?!

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“I'm Hillary's Deplorable”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#28700 Aug 6, 2013
Ask your teachers, what's the most compelling experiment for climate change mitigation they've found. If they describe something that doesn't test man made greenhouse gas on Earth's climate; there's your proof this isn't hard science.

“Wise up Rise up”

Since: Aug 13

Location hidden

#28702 Aug 6, 2013
It NEEDS to get hotter

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#28704 Aug 6, 2013
Looks like someone confuses their opinions with facts. Looks like someone needs a timeout. Looks like someone is having a hissy fit.

“I'm Hillary's Deplorable”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#28705 Aug 6, 2013
Bushwhacker wrote:
Ask your teachers.... what the cost would be for your model, offer to pay for it, and prove you'd understand it...or you have no point, endlessly.
I'm not writing about models, I'm writing about experiments and how they are used to test and refine theories. It's not my job to pay for your bad science.
worried

Seattle, WA

#28706 Aug 6, 2013
The Integral wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps you should change your moniker, since you are no expert.
Please read the following article and get back to me with your response:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v429/n69...
oh but 'integral', that would mean all of the warmers fell for the failed politican b.s. and were wrong all the way.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Ramsey County / Meth dealer's motives in sting ... (Aug '08) 2 hr Lynnhollenbeck 13
News Fmr. Prior Lake Youth Pastor Charged With Havin... 7 hr Newt G s Next Wife 12
Hillary will lose! "EmailGate" NOT WORTHY TO BE... 9 hr cantmakeitup 5
Don't vote for Hillary! 9 hr cantmakeitup 7
Can't manage the gov & NOT honest or trustworthy (Nov '13) Fri LIbEralS 548
News Father Of Fatally Shot 2-Year-Old Arrested Fri LIbEralS 32
Sick hillary Sep 22 WASPaphobe 9

Minneapolis Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Minneapolis Mortgages