Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say

Full story: TwinCities.com

Scientists from around the world are providing even more evidence of global warming, one day after President Barack Obama renewed his call for climate legislation.

Comments (Page 1,305)

Showing posts 26,081 - 26,100 of29,878
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Bushwhacker

Kent, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27618
Jul 8, 2013
 

Judged:

31

31

30

SO, the anti-government guy wants to ignore voter's mandates & pick YOUR path for no written reason ?? Sounds "rite" ?

Sometimes, you rite like a 6 year old....Other-times, you're just plain childish.

“Let's X Change!!”

Since: Feb 09

B4 HOPE Is Gone...

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27619
Jul 8, 2013
 

Judged:

24

24

24

Bushwhacker wrote:
You're just a faker throwing terms around without the background, just like investing & speculating.
The best shorts frequently are "shares unavailable".
Stay rite here blathering, it's safer, for you.
Please, stay outta the market, for your own good.
My new name for you is "ignorance in action".
lol....you really are clueless, son. Your posts prove it.
Psssst...."you're all mouth and no action". Lol....where's your statement...where's the lawyers address you insisted on using?? All mouth..all lies...all the time.
Sick idiot!!!

“Let's X Change!!”

Since: Feb 09

B4 HOPE Is Gone...

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27620
Jul 8, 2013
 

Judged:

20

20

20

How many years did it take for your neurosis to get this bad?
Have you always been a habitual liar, son?

“Let's X Change!!”

Since: Feb 09

B4 HOPE Is Gone...

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27621
Jul 8, 2013
 

Judged:

22

22

22

Bushwhacker wrote:
Sometimes, you rite like a 6 year old....Other-times, you're just plain childish.
grow up ya lying fruitcake!
Lol....what a dumb stump troll you are.
Bushwhacker

Kent, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27622
Jul 8, 2013
 

Judged:

21

21

19

Assed- " how many shares did you buy? you never answer that question. <smirk>"

Answered- "Perhaps, someone who controlled @10k shares ???"

My new name for you is "ignorance in action".


BZZZZZZZZtttTTT Dumb liar daddy ZZZZZZZ TTTTTTTTTTTTT !!!

“Let's X Change!!”

Since: Feb 09

B4 HOPE Is Gone...

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27623
Jul 8, 2013
 

Judged:

21

21

20

Bushwhacker wrote:
Assed- " how many shares did you buy? you never answer that question. <smirk>"
Answered- "Perhaps, someone who controlled @10k shares ???"
My new name for you is "ignorance in action".
BZZZZZZZZtttTTT Dumb liar daddy ZZZZZZZ TTTTTTTTTTTTT !!!
im sitting on positions that make or lose more in a day than you made on your little paper trade, son. I made more on RIN's last month than your paper trade made if you actually bought the low and sold the high in the last year....which you didn't. I won't ask anything else from you, since you're pretty weak in substantiating your claims, son. It's the way of 100% of the liars I've come across. I'll just sit back and laugh at you! Lol
gcaveman1

Louin, MS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27624
Jul 8, 2013
 

Judged:

22

22

20

Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Our country is moving in the wrong direction, we need to reduce regulations to enhance freedom, reduce high taxes to enhance economic activity and stop wasteful spending on green and renewable energy crony boondoggles. Just because Oil Barons used to monopolize lobbying government is no reason to except any cronyism, even from anti-capitalists.
Sorry Charlie, "trickle-down" has been forced on us for decades and look where we are. It's a fail.

Let's cut the subsidies to fossil fuel and increase them for renewables and see what happens.

It would be something like the giant subsidy given to the trucking industry at the expense of the railroads. That subsidy was called the Interstate Highway System. A side benefit went to a little joint called McDonald's, which in turn spawned many smaller clones.

Supporting renewables could be a gigantic stimulus to the American economy. Your economics are outdated and seriously flawed.
Bushwhacker

Kent, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27625
Jul 8, 2013
 

Judged:

21

21

19

ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>im sitting on positions that make or lose more in a day than you made on your little paper trade, son. I made more on RIN's last month than your paper trade made if you actually bought the low and sold the high in the last year....which you didn't. I won't ask anything else from you, since you're pretty weak in substantiating your claims, son. It's the way of 100% of the liars I've come across. I'll just sit back and laugh at you! Lol
i'm ??

Assed- " how many shares did you buy? you never answer that question. <smirk>"

Answered- "Perhaps, someone who controlled @10k shares ???"

My new name for you is "ignorance in action".


No, you're a child, that should avoid the market. You've proven to be a sloppy liar & an inadequate lover, even for a necrophiliac....

Poor troll, math on 10k share is too tough ?? LMAOROFU~!

So, is your loser "life".

“Let's X Change!!”

Since: Feb 09

B4 HOPE Is Gone...

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27626
Jul 8, 2013
 

Judged:

22

22

21

Bushwhacker wrote:
<quoted text>i'm ??
"im" on an iphone.....is that all you got, turnip? small caps and text style messaging is all blowhards like you are deserve.

dummy.

liar.

whackjob.

“Let's X Change!!”

Since: Feb 09

B4 HOPE Is Gone...

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27627
Jul 8, 2013
 

Judged:

19

19

18

"are" is another unbaited hook im sure you can't resist, gomer.

“Let's X Change!!”

Since: Feb 09

B4 HOPE Is Gone...

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27628
Jul 8, 2013
 

Judged:

20

20

20

Bushwhacker wrote:
<quoted text>i'm ??
Assed- " how many shares did you buy? you never answer that question. <smirk>"
Answered- "Perhaps, someone who controlled @10k shares ???"
My new name for you is "ignorance in action".
No, you're a child, that should avoid the market. You've proven to be a sloppy liar & an inadequate lover, even for a necrophiliac....
Poor troll, math on 10k share is too tough ?? LMAOROFU~!
So, is your loser "life".
psssst.....you know even less about my love life than you do the markets, son.

bwahahahahahahaha

what a fuquing dolt!!!
Kyle

Ligonier, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27629
Jul 8, 2013
 

Judged:

21

21

21

ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>climate always changes, skippy. what will mitigating co2 do to change that? admit it, son, you have no idea! lol
TRANS: "I'm denier scum, do I'm far too dishonest to admit that I was ever wrong on anything."

Concession noted. Dishonesty reaffirmed.

“CAPS LOCK CAUSE CLIMATE CHANGE”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27630
Jul 8, 2013
 

Judged:

22

22

22

gcaveman1 wrote:
Sorry Charlie, "trickle-down" has been forced on us for decades and look where we are. It's a fail.
Let's cut the subsidies to fossil fuel and increase them for renewables and see what happens.
Stop all wasteful government spending, energy and fuel don't need government help in the market, else its just a boondoggle.

.
gcaveman1 wrote:
It would be something like the giant subsidy given to the trucking industry at the expense of the railroads. That subsidy was called the Interstate Highway System. A side benefit went to a little joint called McDonald's, which in turn spawned many smaller clones.
That "subsidy" is paid by fossil fuel consumers and producers; federal fuel taxes. Is gcaveman1 thinking the zero emission cars of the future won't need roads, they'll hover on anti-gravity gimbals? That 'subsidy' is used by everyone who wants to go somewhere or have goods or services delivered anywhere.

.
gcaveman1 wrote:
Supporting renewables could be a gigantic stimulus to the American economy. Your economics are outdated and seriously flawed.
And maybe, it will continue to produce the string of bankruptcies and broken promises, the empty plants and impoverished investors. We've been supporting renewables, green, solar and wind for forty years; doing the same thing but expecting different results is psychotic.

“Let's X Change!!”

Since: Feb 09

B4 HOPE Is Gone...

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27631
Jul 8, 2013
 

Judged:

23

23

23

Kyle wrote:
<quoted text>TRANS: "I'm denier scum, do I'm far too dishonest to admit that I was ever wrong on anything."
Concession noted. Dishonesty reaffirmed.
lol....your cluelessness is confirmed! Congratulations!!
Bushwhacker

Kent, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27632
Jul 8, 2013
 

Judged:

28

28

25

Assed- " how many shares did you buy? you never answer that question. <smirk>"

Answered- "Perhaps, someone who controlled @10k shares ???"

My new name for you is "ignorance in action".

BZZZzzzZZttTTT Dumb liar daddy ZZZzzZZZ TTTTTTTTTTTTT !!! LMAOROFU~!

I see YOUR portfolio, it's as impressive as you .... Oops !!
Bushwhacker

Kent, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27633
Jul 8, 2013
 

Judged:

27

27

26

ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>lol....your cluelessness is confirmed! Congratulations!!
Lied about my weather statement, my investment prowess, the meaning of investing vs speculating, my share number's posting, and sleeping with cadavers ...

Yee haw, you're piling up "credentials"

Rite is a poser, although a child that spells "throw" as "through"... would be MY FIRST CHOICE(cough, cough,*snicker*, snicker*)to interpret complicated concepts....(*snicker* snicker*)

The name calling & claims of superiority are a nice touch, but...only posers, pretenders, and children do that. Superior folks can provide proof, it abounds in OUR lives.

Poor, delusional, broke azz, moron.
gcaveman1

Louin, MS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27634
Jul 8, 2013
 

Judged:

25

25

23

Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Stop all wasteful government spending, energy and fuel don't need government help in the market, else its just a boondoggle.
.
<quoted text>That "subsidy" is paid by fossil fuel consumers and producers; federal fuel taxes. Is gcaveman1 thinking the zero emission cars of the future won't need roads, they'll hover on anti-gravity gimbals? That 'subsidy' is used by everyone who wants to go somewhere or have goods or services delivered anywhere.
.
<quoted text>And maybe, it will continue to produce the string of bankruptcies and broken promises, the empty plants and impoverished investors. We've been supporting renewables, green, solar and wind for forty years; doing the same thing but expecting different results is psychotic.
No, fool, I'm talking about the tax breaks and loopholes for fossil companies. Even not passing or enforcing certain regulations subsidizes their bad behavior and increases their profits.

The Interstate system was an unintentional subsidy to trucking companies. Modeled after the Autobahn, it was intended to make things faster and easier, not only for the family car, but for the rapid deployment of supplies and missiles during the Cold War it was birthed within.

The "failing green companies" is a denialist meme. The vast majority of those companies have met with success. You don't like them because you want to put more dirt in the air.
gcaveman1

Louin, MS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27635
Jul 8, 2013
 

Judged:

25

25

23

The Geneva Association, a leading international insurance thinktank that examines trends in the global insurance industry, has published a report this week that identifies “a significant upward trend in the insured losses caused by extreme weather events.”

It warns that changes in climate mean insurance companies have entered a new, highly uncertain era, and must adapt to what it calls a “new normal” in assessing risks and setting pricing policies. Traditional ways of assessing such risks, based solely on analyzing historical data, are “increasingly failing.”

The report, Warming of the Oceans and Implications for the (Re)insurance Industry, says the world’s oceans have been warming significantly as the result of rising greenhouse gas emissions &#8722; and it is this warming that is the key driver of global extreme events.

<><><>< ><><><> <><>

Well, if insurance starts pressuring government, it won't be long before we'll see some changes in energy legislation.
gcaveman1

Louin, MS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27636
Jul 8, 2013
 

Judged:

17

17

16

Here's our boy Krauthammer, making some sense one time, back in 2009:

"High gas prices, whether achieved by market forces or by government imposition, encourage fuel economy. In the short term, they simply reduce the amount of driving. In the longer term, they lead to the increased (voluntary) shift to more fuel-efficient cars. They render redundant and unnecessary the absurd CAFE standards -- the ever-changing Corporate Average Fuel Economy regulations that mandate the fuel efficiency of various car and truck fleets -- which introduce terrible distortions into the market. As the consumer market adjusts itself to more fuel-efficient autos, the green car culture of the future that environmentalists are attempting to impose by decree begins to shape itself unmandated. This shift has the collateral environmental effect of reducing pollution and CO2 emissions, an important benefit for those who believe in man-made global warming and a painless bonus for agnostics (like me) who nonetheless believe that the endless pumping of CO2 into the atmosphere cannot be a good thing... If anthropogenic global warming is real, a reduction in driving and increase in fuel-efficiency is an unvarnished good. If anthropogenic global warming is as yet unproved, as I happen to believe, then the reduction in CO2 pumped into the atmosphere is a reasonable bet in conditions of uncertainty."

“CAPS LOCK CAUSE CLIMATE CHANGE”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27637
Jul 8, 2013
 

Judged:

48

48

48

gcaveman1 wrote:
No, fool, I'm talking about the tax breaks and loopholes for fossil companies. Even not passing or enforcing certain regulations subsidizes their bad behavior and increases their profits.
The only 'subsidy' gcaveman1 specifies is the highway system. The loopholes mentioned above might apply to all producers with capital expense depreciation.

.
gcaveman1 wrote:
The Interstate system was an unintentional subsidy to trucking companies. Modeled after the Autobahn, it was intended to make things faster and easier, not only for the family car, but for the rapid deployment of supplies and missiles during the Cold War it was birthed within.
So, the interstates weren't built to subsidize fossil fuel, they were built to help defend America. Even now, since the trucking companies pay for road construction and maintenance from the taxes they pay for fuel.

.
gcaveman1 wrote:
The "failing green companies" is a denialist meme. The vast majority of those companies have met with success. You don't like them because you want to put more dirt in the air.
Solyndra is just one example of a bankrupt solar company that lost hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 26,081 - 26,100 of29,878
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
Minneapolis Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Minneapolis Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••