Global warming 'undeniable,' scientis...

Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say

There are 35607 comments on the TwinCities.com story from Jul 29, 2010, titled Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say. In it, TwinCities.com reports that:

Scientists from around the world are providing even more evidence of global warming, one day after President Barack Obama renewed his call for climate legislation.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at TwinCities.com.

Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#27320 Jun 17, 2013
Want my lawyer's name, post your address...

HAPPY TO SEND IT, dipshit.

Sure, whatever you NEED to tell yourself.

Too EZ, this denier is PURE UNADULTERATED LIAR !!!

SADLY, MY PROOF IS YOUR QUOTED WORDS....
.back up your claim that the tornado yesterday was due to man made co2..."

MAGICALLY GETS DENIER WHIPPED TO
..."yes, you implied that weather events have something to do with..."

MAGICALLY GETS DENIER WHIPPED TO
"....you didn't say the exact words.....but you would've..."

Due to = implied = would have???

You're not smart implies you're dumb and according to your "words", I caused your stupidity. It's due to me POINTING IT OUT ???
Yeah, just make it up as you go, then ask for proof, from anyone else...

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#27321 Jun 17, 2013
Bushwhacker wrote:
Want my lawyer's name, post your address...
HAPPY TO SEND IT, dipshit.
Sure, whatever you NEED to tell yourself.
Too EZ, this denier is PURE UNADULTERATED LIAR !!!
SADLY, MY PROOF IS YOUR QUOTED WORDS....
.back up your claim that the tornado yesterday was due to man made co2..."
MAGICALLY GETS DENIER WHIPPED TO
..."yes, you implied that weather events have something to do with..."
MAGICALLY GETS DENIER WHIPPED TO
"....you didn't say the exact words.....but you would've..."
Due to = implied = would have???
You're not smart implies you're dumb and according to your "words", I caused your stupidity. It's due to me POINTING IT OUT ???
Yeah, just make it up as you go, then ask for proof, from anyone else...
LOL!!!
All these words and you say nothing.
Why waste co2 so needlessly, son?
Reality sure seems to be your kryptonite! Lol

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#27322 Jun 17, 2013
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/...

And the walls come tumbling down....
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#27324 Jun 17, 2013
Lame & Dame the odd couple ???

Dynamic duds ?

Mutt & Jeff, the dumb dumbs....

How can you tell when they've run out of invisible ink?

Same way they can tell when they have a thought...

NOTHING APPEARS !!!

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#27325 Jun 17, 2013
Bushwhacker wrote:
Lame & Dame the odd couple ???
Dynamic duds ?
Mutt & Jeff, the dumb dumbs....
How can you tell when they've run out of invisible ink?
Same way they can tell when they have a thought...
NOTHING APPEARS !!!
lol....there are sources that can help your obsessive-compulsive disorder. Find the courage to reach out.
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#27326 Jun 17, 2013
Think GED hurry..... 6th graders are leaving you in the dust.
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#27327 Jun 17, 2013
Translation- rat got caught and deflection is the dumbass "solution". Poor rat.....Cheesy & sleazy games.

SpaceBlues

United States

#27328 Jun 17, 2013
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
http://canadafreepress.com/ind ex.php/article/55939
And the walls come tumbling down....
Lying is unacceptable:

Truth is that "rising greenhouse gas emissions must result in more warming - "That carbon dioxide warms the climate is not in doubt."

So if there's more carbon dioxide, and the warming isn't staying in the atmosphere, where is it going?

Surface temperature is only a small (but important) part of the climate system. In fact, most of the extra heat the planet absorbs goes into the oceans, climate scientist at the University of Reading Dr Richard Allan tells us:

"The vast ocean has a huge capacity to store heat … To balance the books you need to be measuring the energy coming in at the top of the atmosphere and all the places where it's going to really understand how the climate is heating."

http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2013/05/doubl...

Get a hold of the truth.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#27329 Jun 17, 2013
Bushwhacker wrote:
Think GED hurry..... 6th graders are leaving you in the dust.
lol....are you deflecting again?
Poor lazy idiotic creep.
Psssst. The center line on the highway isn't necessarily a safe zone for varmints.
Just saying.
Pull off on the shoulder, son, and regroup.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#27330 Jun 17, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Lying is unacceptable:
Truth is that "rising greenhouse gas emissions must result in more warming - "That carbon dioxide warms the climate is not in doubt."
So if there's more carbon dioxide, and the warming isn't staying in the atmosphere, where is it going?
Surface temperature is only a small (but important) part of the climate system. In fact, most of the extra heat the planet absorbs goes into the oceans, climate scientist at the University of Reading Dr Richard Allan tells us:
"The vast ocean has a huge capacity to store heat … To balance the books you need to be measuring the energy coming in at the top of the atmosphere and all the places where it's going to really understand how the climate is heating."
http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2013/05/doubl...
Get a hold of the truth.
if lying is unacceptable why do you seem to enjoy it so much. Claiming ignorance is not a defense for you, btw.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#27331 Jun 17, 2013
I guess the heat went and hid down in the ocean to make your models look even more stupid?
Pesky sneaky heat!!
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#27332 Jun 17, 2013
I like facts.... the facts we have so far, is you're a market loser, a liar for misquoting, and a denier without a clue...

Really SUCKS TO BE you.....

I'd point out you're UN-original and moronic, but that's like saying you're a POS... Unnecessary & taken for granted.
SpaceBlues

United States

#27333 Jun 17, 2013
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>if lying is unacceptable why do you seem to enjoy it so much. Claiming ignorance is not a defense for you, btw.
Psst .. I said lying is unaceptable.

You are the one who seems to enjoy lies and ignorance. Did you read the reference?

Oh it is apparent you don't understand any physics, though. You engage in empty arguments with pure strangers. It must be the loneliness of being a science denier.
Sunny

Longview, WA

#27334 Jun 17, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Psst .. I said lying is unaceptable.
You are the one who seems to enjoy lies and ignorance. Did you read the reference?
Oh it is apparent you don't understand any physics, though. You engage in empty arguments with pure strangers. It must be the loneliness of being a science denier.
Your full of hot co2 an that is no lie.
SpaceBlues

United States

#27335 Jun 17, 2013
Sunny wrote:
<quoted text>Your full of hot co2 an that is no lie.
hehehe no comment

http://129.164.179.22/apod/ap1 30617.html
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

#27336 Jun 17, 2013
ritedownthemiddle wrote:
<quoted text>if lying is unacceptable why do you seem to enjoy it so much. Claiming ignorance is not a defense for you, btw.
Space is contributing, and in a grown-up manner.

You contribute nothing. All talk. Where's the science you say we don't know? At Tony Watts' site? Yall think you know more than anyone else......

.....don't know shit.
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

#27338 Jun 17, 2013
On May 15, the peer-reviewed paper, Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature was published in the scientific journal, Environmental Research Letters (ERL). The paper presents The Consensus Project (TCP)– a survey of over 12,000 peer-reviewed climate science papers by our volunteer, citizen science team at Skeptical Science. The analysis found a 97% consensus among papers taking a position on the cause of global warming in the peer-reviewed literature that humans are responsible.

Since its online publication, Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature has been downloaded more times than any other paper in ERL history, over 54,000 times.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#27339 Jun 17, 2013
Bushwhacker wrote:
I like facts.... the facts we have so far, is you're a market loser, a liar for misquoting, and a denier without a clue...
Really SUCKS TO BE you.....
I'd point out you're UN-original and moronic, but that's like saying you're a POS... Unnecessary & taken for granted.
oh, really, son? because i didn't trade you 'paper trade' penny stock?!?! lol

still waiting on your lawyers address, little poser!!!

you do have an attorney, right???

your stupidity will go down into the annals of topix, son.

LOL
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

#27340 Jun 17, 2013
Some myths pushed by the anti-science crowd are so laughably backwards that repeating them should be grounds for expulsion from homo “sapiens.” And so it is with the doubly wrong claim that progressives are now using the term ‘climate change’ because the planet has supposedly stopped warming.

Of course, it hasn’t actually stopped warming (see “Global Warming Has Accelerated In Past 15 Years, New Study Of Oceans Confirms“).

But since the deniers make up stuff about the science, why shouldn’t they make up stuff about everything else?

Indeed, it is conservatives who typically change the names of things, as in refusing to say “Democratic” but only “Democrat” and insisting on “death tax” rather than “estate tax,” even though only big estates are taxed, not death.

That latter switch was championed by the GOP’s spinmaster, Frank Luntz, who, as it turns out, also championed switching from ‘global warming’ to ‘climate change’ in 2003. Scientists, environmentalists, progressives, and frankly the whole darn planet have always used both terms — hence the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, established in 1988.

“BET DAP”

Since: Feb 09

GOOM BOWN

#27341 Jun 17, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Psst .. I said lying is unaceptable.
You are the one who seems to enjoy lies and ignorance. Did you read the reference?
Oh it is apparent you don't understand any physics, though. You engage in empty arguments with pure strangers. It must be the loneliness of being a science denier.
if you're going to claim someone's post is "unaceptable"......l earn how to spell the word, hack!!! i know how 'your crowd' is so picky about shyt like that!! so, try to maintain face!!!

Bwahahahahahahahaha

it's apparent you don't understand scientific studies, theories, and procedures.

do your 'read'only what you want to believe, son, in articles on the internet????

you don't hold sway on anyone in the scientific community.....not even here, son.

you're just a political hack!!!

i'm a science 'realist'....you....well...no reality there.

peace.

game over, chump.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BLM urge rioting over OSU SHOOTING 1 hr Phineas 15
Drop one word....add one word game (Apr '14) 15 hr texas pete 628
Get Over It! 22 hr Evil Roy Slade 10
Obama & BLM mourn monstor Fidel Castro Fri Protesters CAN WORK 50
Child sex ring>Pizzagate>Clinton's>Obama's>FBI ... Dec 1 Georgia 1
News Cops To Drunk Drivers: We'll Make You Listen To... Nov 30 Ferrerman 20
Trump Won The Popular Vote Nov 29 Obamas comments 3

Minneapolis Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Minneapolis Mortgages