Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say

Bushwhacker wrote:

If GW is deniable, WHY ARE YOU A CHILDISH LIAR ???
SADLY, MY PROOF IS YOUR QUOTED WORDS....

sadly for you.....your "proof" only lives in your childish brain, brown bagger.

If GW is deniable, WHY ARE YOU A CHILDISH LIAR ???

SADLY, MY PROOF IS YOUR QUOTED WORDS....

.back up your claim that the tornado yesterday was due to man made co2..."

MAGICALLY GETS DENIER WHIPPED TO

..."yes, you implied that weather events have something to do with..."

MAGICALLY GETS DENIER WHIPPED TO

"....you didn't say the exact words.....but you would've..."

Due to = implied = would have???

You're not smart implies you're dumb and according to your "words", I caused your stupidity. It's due to me POINTING IT OUT ???

Yeah, just make it up as you go, then ask for proof, from anyone else...

Bushwhacker wrote:

<quoted text>"...i might through you back..."

mea culpa!!!!

see how easy that was?!?!

i make a mistake i own up to it instead of lyong and calling others liars to cover up a lie.

maybe you an learn from this, but i doubt it. you'd much rather point out a homophone instead of back up your postion, is it because you can't?

BTW>>>> homophones, typos, and spelling errors have been shown to have little to do with IQ.....but more to do with focus and attention! and let's face it, brown bagger, it requires very little time or attention to swat dog pecker gnats like you, son.

Karma is a_______ wrote:

<quoted text>
MBA....figured it wasn't a science based degree....so I suggest you leave the science to the professionals
so how about a link to those scientists that disagree with global warming
and to the fudged data

Are you a science professional?!?!?!

If so, I have several questions you should have no problem resolving for the forum!!

Are you game?

If GW is deniable, WHY ARE YOU A CHILDISH LIAR ???

SADLY, MY PROOF IS YOUR QUOTED WORDS....

.back up your claim that the tornado yesterday was due to man made co2..."

MAGICALLY GETS DENIER WHIPPED TO

..."yes, you implied that weather events have something to do with..."

MAGICALLY GETS DENIER WHIPPED TO

"....you didn't say the exact words.....but you would've..."

Due to = implied = would have???

You're not smart implies you're dumb and according to your "words", I caused your stupidity. It's due to me POINTING IT OUT ???

Yeah, just make it up as you go, then ask for proof, from anyone else...

SpaceBlues wrote:

<quoted text>Speaking of evidence, where's it?
It is absent in your posts.

be patient.....i'm just getting back home.

looks like i've been missed.

SpaceBlues wrote:

<quoted text>np, litesong :)
You are welcome.

zou bisous bisous?!?! how sweet!
:-)

litesong wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, business degrees only teach how to take money away from people that build companies' wealth, the scientists, technologists, developers, designers, blue collars, secretaries, & even minimum wage earners, & put that money in the hands of upper crust management, paper shufflers & people shovers. That's where all the $100 million dollar bonus, retirement & stock option packages go. Not satisfied with that, they even invented hedge funds in which billions of dollars are funneled to individuals.

LOL!!!!!

no surprise that you or bushywhack would have this view on free enterprise or business.

you brown shirts hate all things capitalistic.

but.....can one of you idiotic brown bags answer a question for me??? where would the scientist, the tech, the developer, the designer, or the blue collar find a job if it weren't for the american businessman?

say govt.....please!!!

bwahahahahahahaa

Attention, teabagger, the rock candy in the urinals is NOT for you.

frontporchreactionary wrote:

<quoted text> You did not call anyone out or refute them on climate change. There ARE 'connections' between weather and the rapidly rising CO2 greenhouse gasses emissions into our atmosphere that we've seen the past 30-40 years. It's been scientifically proved that the burning of fossil fuels at an accelerating rate today is causing extreme changes in our climate .

HEY!!! You should call out "BUSHWHACED"....son, he insists that the oklahoma tornado has nothing to do with climate change or co2! i thought "BUSWHACKED OUT" implied it.....but he claims i'm lying about that.

you really should talk to him.....you people have a hard time getting your story and facts straight.

Your proof I said something is I'm not registered ? "man", that's rich......
Hey, a friend of yours who's not on topix says your mother costs 5 cents a lay.....
Sorry news pal, but they're your "rules".
Your proof I said something is I'm not registered ? "man", that's rich......
Hey, a friend of yours who's not on topix says your mother costs 5 cents a lay.....
Sorry news pal, but they're your "rules".
Your proof I said something is I'm not registered ? "man", that's rich......
Hey, a friend of yours who's not on topix says your mother costs 5 cents a lay.....
Sorry news pal, but they're your "rules".
Your proof I said something is I'm not registered ? "man", that's rich......
Hey, a friend of yours who's not on topix says your mother costs 5 cents a lay.....
Sorry news pal, but they're your "rules".
Your proof I said something is I'm not registered ? "man", that's rich......
Hey, a friend of yours who's not on topix says your mother costs 5 cents a lay.....
Sorry news pal, but they're your "rules".
Your proof I said something is I'm not registered ? "man", that's rich......
Hey, a friend of yours who's not on topix says your mother costs 5 cents a lay.....
Sorry news pal, but they're your "rules".
Your proof I said something is I'm not registered ? "man", that's rich......
Hey, a friend of yours who's not on topix says your mother costs 5 cents a lay.....
Sorry news pal, but they're your "rules".
Your proof I said something is I'm not registered ? "man", that's rich......
Hey, a friend of yours who's not on topix says your mother costs 5 cents a lay.....
Sorry news pal, but they're your "rules".
Your proof I said something is I'm not registered ? "man", that's rich......
Hey, a friend of yours who's not on topix says your mother costs 5 cents a lay.....
Sorry news pal, but they're your "rules".
Your proof I said something is I'm not registered ? "man", that's rich......
Hey, a friend of yours who's not on topix says your mother costs 5 cents a lay.....
Sorry news pal, but they're your "rules".
Your proof I said something is I'm not registered ? "man", that's rich......
Hey, a friend of yours who's not on topix says your mother costs 5 cents a lay.....
Sorry news pal, but they're your "rules".
Your proof I said something is I'm not registered ? "man", that's rich......
Hey, a friend of yours who's not on topix says your mother costs 5 cents a lay.....
Sorry news pal, but they're your "rules".
Your proof I said something is I'm not registered ? "man", that's rich......
Hey, a friend of yours who's not on topix says your mother costs 5 cents a lay.....
Sorry news pal, but they're your "rules".
Your proof I said something is I'm not registered ? "man", that's rich......
Hey, a friend of yours who's not on topix says your mother costs 5 cents a lay.....
Sorry news pal, but they're your "rules".
Your proof I said something is I'm not registered ? "man", that's rich......
Hey, a friend of yours who's not on topix says your mother costs 5 cents a lay.....
Sorry news pal, but they're your "rules".
Your proof I said something is I'm not registered ? "man", that's rich......
Hey, a friend of yours who's not on topix says your mother costs 5 cents a lay.....
Sorry news pal, but they're your "rules".
Your proof I said something is I'm not registered ? "man", that's rich......
Hey, a friend of yours who's not on topix says your mother costs 5 cents a lay.....
Sorry news pal, but they're your "rules".
Your proof I said something is I'm not registered ? "man", that's rich......
Hey, a friend of yours who's not on topix says your mother costs 5 cents a lay.....
Sorry news pal, but they're your "rules".

Kyle wrote:

<quoted text> Evidence - sourced evidence - please. Anything less = a concession.
I've seen how the 97% was derived and find it to be quite proper. In fact, the implication that 3% of active climate researchers reject the major findings inre GW is misleading. They generally only quibble with a portion of it. True rejection of it among those who know the subject best is vanishingly rare. It's primarily rejected by political ideologues from other fields.

who said you wrote the rule book, KYLE? I always hated that faggus name, btw.

more to come.....

Without government, you'd be speaking Japanese, Chinese, or German and washing cars for a nickle per.... Degree ? Please bYtch ! LMAOROFU!

Bushwhacker wrote:

SADLY, MY PROOF IS YOUR QUOTED WORDS....
....back up your claim that the tornado yesterday was due to man made co2..."
MAGICALLY GETS DENIER WHIPPED TO
..."yes, you implied that weather events have something to do with..."
MAGICALLY GETS DENIER WHIPPED TO
"....you didn't say the exact words.....but you would've..."
Due to = implied = would have???
You're not smart implies you're dumb and according to your "words", I caused your stupidity. It's due to me POINTING IT OUT ???
Yeah, just make it up as you go, then ask for proof, from anyone else...

don't beat up on 'frontporch' too bad.....as if you could actually beat up on anyone, brownbagger.

Bushwhacker wrote:

They "through" a lot of cow pies.... LMAOROTFU~!!!
Unfortunately, "strait" over their heads/jackets...

LOL...

zou bisous bisous....

gcaveman1 wrote:

<quoted text>
So your position now is that not only are most of the world's scientists either stupid or running a huge scam, but that most of the world's insurance companies don't know how to assess risk.
What about city and state planners? Lost their minds too? What about the CIA and the US military? Fools who fell for a scam?
Are you and your buddies the only wise people in the world?

psssst......caveman.....the insurance industry knows how to take a layup and up premiums when the opportunity arises.

i thought you greenies and "99%ers" already grasped that concept!!

frontporchreactionary wrote:

<quoted text> Bill Maher seems always to be on point. New Rule - science is made by scientists not idiots ! http://youtu.be/06R-qTXfVYE

LOL....i get my science from scientists.

you clowns get yours from a comedian.....or a politician.

very telling.

If GW is deniable, WHY ARE YOU A CHILDISH LIAR ???

SADLY, MY PROOF IS YOUR QUOTED WORDS....

.back up your claim that the tornado yesterday was due to man made co2..."

MAGICALLY GETS DENIER WHIPPED TO

..."yes, you implied that weather events have something to do with..."

MAGICALLY GETS DENIER WHIPPED TO

"....you didn't say the exact words.....but you would've..."

Due to = implied = would have???

You're not smart implies you're dumb and according to your "words", I caused your stupidity. It's due to me POINTING IT OUT ???

Yeah, just make it up as you go, then ask for proof, from anyone else...

Bushwhacker wrote:

Funny, how the deniers seem to blather, use random caps, and spew hate towards folks who make them look foolish, huh ?? LMAOROTFU~!
Keep the icons coming, they REALLY MATTER ?
So, con, pc, and rite are the same spammer....

WOW....just WOW!!! I go away for a couple days yet easily stayed inside your little head....

lol

poor little brown bag

They "through" a lot of cow pies.... LMAOROTFU~!!!
Unfortunately, "strait" over their heads/jackets...

Can't use single syllable words, but wants to ask informed questions...!? HARDLY....

Waste of organs....