i never undersood why libwhacks had a problem with bush. he liked to spend! isn't that the gold standard for the left?<quoted text>
You DO realize that "Bush...Whacker" is a liberal whose moniker is a subtle Freudian joke, and by using his name in an entirely unethical way, you are also pretending to be an enviro-wacko who is opposed to action on climate? therefore making you schizophrenic?
Have the balls to use your own name, denier, and let us see who you really are. Surely you can mock somewhat creatively without using a smart person's name. It's something we all learned on the playground, right?
But, while you're at it, bring some science to the discussion. We have already presented ours and your side is desperately short.
he left barry a good roadmap in winning the war on terror.
maybe he didn't post enough photos of his peckr on twitter?
but anyway.....i'm still waiting on the science that shows how reducing or eliminating fossil fuels will mitigate climate change.
since science is on your side....i can assume you have that study in your notebook, right?