Global warming 'undeniable,' scientis...

Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say

There are 36786 comments on the TwinCities.com story from Jul 29, 2010, titled Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say. In it, TwinCities.com reports that:

Scientists from around the world are providing even more evidence of global warming, one day after President Barack Obama renewed his call for climate legislation.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at TwinCities.com.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#25171 Apr 19, 2013
Kyle wrote:
Dodge = concession I asked for science that supports your claims of causation other than the GHE or by a GHG other than CO2. You tapped danced. You lose.
I'm not a scientist, I don't design experiments that test theories for my living. I can't find an experimental test of man made global warming; can you cite one?

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#25172 Apr 19, 2013
gcaveman1 wrote:
NO, LIAR, you didn't "probably" write "If", you wrote: "Using fossil fuel helps free ancient carbon back into the atmosphere where it can do some good. Freeing carbon dioxide into the air helps mitigate climate change against global cooling; the well known ice age climate scenario." I don't call my political opponents 'liars' because they don't use the scientific method. I call them liars when they LIE!
LIAR.
I might have abbreviated my argument, in the example above the AGW assumption is tacit. I'm sorry of gcaveman1 is confused.
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#25173 Apr 19, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>I'm not a scientist, I don't design experiments that test theories for my living. I can't find an experimental test of man made global warming; can you cite one?
If you're not a scientist, then performing the "experiment" would have no meaning for you, even if it were possible...

Perhaps, we could ask you to see if you can live without several organs ? I see you've started with your "brain", try your liver next.

Weak & stupid argument & you know it.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#25174 Apr 20, 2013
Even non scientists can see how experiments are used in science to test theories. I find the emotion driven climate fear argument worst of all; shame on politicians demagoguing climate science. They are as shameful as the public funded researchers that find a vested interest in public funds for research.
Dont drink the koolaid

Eden Prairie, MN

#25175 Apr 20, 2013
Kyle wrote:
<quoted text>
We know that it's not water vapor because it can only be a dependent variable. For idiots like you, I'll explain:
.
We know it is not water vapor because the scientists leave that variable out of their computer models...
Further evidence that the planet may burn up from 40 additional molecules of CO2.
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#25176 Apr 20, 2013
Humidity in the Earth's atmosphere is on the rise.4 More moisture in the air can mean more intense rain or snowfall. When the temperatures are warm, there has been an increase in heavy rain for the most extreme events of the year5 that can cause significant flooding and damage to homes, roads, and sewage systems. When temperatures hover below freezing, blizzards can occur more often—particularly in the Dakotas and western Minnesota.6 These storms cause major transportation delays, lengthy power outages, school and business closings, and sometimes collapsed roofs, including the Metrodome roof in December 2010.7

Monthly snowfall totals of more than 15 inches (38 centimeters) have occurred almost two and a half times more often in the Minneapolis–St. Paul area since the Metrodome was built than in the 50 years prior to its construction.8
The December 2010 blizzard in the Twin Cities brought particularly heavy, wet snow, with a snow–to–liquid ratio of 9 to 1, compared with the December–to–February average of 15 to 1.9 Heavier snow occurs with warmer winter temperatures and a ready supply of moisture.10
As much as 80 percent of all snowstorms of more than 6 inches in the United States in the twentieth century occurred during winters that had above–average temperatures and were wetter than normal.11
The economic impact of winter storms has been rising rapidly, reflecting higher–intensity
Dont drink the koolaid

Eden Prairie, MN

#25177 Apr 20, 2013
Bushwhacker wrote:
Humidity in the Earth's atmosphere is on the rise.4 More moisture in the air can mean more intense rain or snowfall. When the temperatures are warm, there has been an increase in heavy rain for the most extreme events of the year5 that can cause significant flooding and damage to homes, roads, and sewage systems. When temperatures hover below freezing, blizzards can occur more often—particularly in the Dakotas and western Minnesota.6 These storms cause major transportation delays, lengthy power outages, school and business closings, and sometimes collapsed roofs, including the Metrodome roof in December 2010.7
Monthly snowfall totals of more than 15 inches (38 centimeters) have occurred almost two and a half times more often in the Minneapolis–St. Paul area since the Metrodome was built than in the 50 years prior to its construction.8
The December 2010 blizzard in the Twin Cities brought particularly heavy, wet snow, with a snow–to–liquid ratio of 9 to 1, compared with the December–to–February average of 15 to 1.9 Heavier snow occurs with warmer winter temperatures and a ready supply of moisture.10
As much as 80 percent of all snowstorms of more than 6 inches in the United States in the twentieth century occurred during winters that had above–average temperatures and were wetter than normal.11
The economic impact of winter storms has been rising rapidly, reflecting higher–intensity
Yes, thousands of these severe weather events have been recorded in the past year alone!
Yet, no one can find a single report of a severe weather event prior to Man's presence on Earth... Strong evidence that Man made Global Warming causes severe weather.
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#25178 Apr 20, 2013
Humidity in the Earth's atmosphere is on the rise.4 More moisture in the air can mean more intense rain or snowfall. When the temperatures are warm, there has been an increase in heavy rain for the most extreme events of the year5 that can cause significant flooding and damage to homes, roads, and sewage systems. When temperatures hover below freezing, blizzards can occur more often—particularly in the Dakotas and western Minnesota.6 These storms cause major transportation delays, lengthy power outages, school and business closings, and sometimes collapsed roofs, including the Metrodome roof in December 2010.7

Monthly snowfall totals of more than 15 inches (38 centimeters) have occurred almost two and a half times more often in the Minneapolis–St. Paul area since the Metrodome was built than in the 50 years prior to its construction.8
The December 2010 blizzard in the Twin Cities brought particularly heavy, wet snow, with a snow–to–liquid ratio of 9 to 1, compared with the December–to–February average of 15 to 1.9 Heavier snow occurs with warmer winter temperatures and a ready supply of moisture.10
As much as 80 percent of all snowstorms of more than 6 inches in the United States in the twentieth century occurred during winters that had above–average temperatures and were wetter than normal.11
The economic impact of winter storms has been rising rapidly, reflecting higher–intensity

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#25179 Apr 20, 2013
Of course it is
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#25180 Apr 20, 2013
Nice of you to add, what you "know".

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#25181 Apr 20, 2013
I like water vapor too, I'm not just for CO2.
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#25182 Apr 20, 2013
Endless repetition of utterly destroyed nonsense argument = just another concession. You have no shame. Apparently, you also have no idea what effect you're having on your cause, either.
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#25183 Apr 20, 2013
We all care what you "like", as you spew absurdities.... Pretty ironic, your "accepted" scientist agrees, there's global warming, but offered no "test" of his blather....
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

#25184 Apr 20, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>I might have abbreviated my argument, in the example above the AGW assumption is tacit. I'm sorry of gcaveman1 is confused.
No, you might have gotten confused. That's what happens you tell a lot of lies; it's hard to keep up with all of them.

Just yesterday, you admitted that sea level is rising and said on another thread that there was no proof of that. You might be confused, but there's something else. Everyone here is getting used to your new name, lyin' brian.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#25185 Apr 20, 2013
gcaveman1 wrote:
No, you might have gotten confused. That's what happens you tell a lot of lies; it's hard to keep up with all of them. Just yesterday, you admitted that sea level is rising and said on another thread that there was no proof of that. You might be confused, but there's something else. Everyone here is getting used to your new name, lyin' brian.
Sea levels rise and fall, trends don't tell us anything about right now and the future, just about the past. Recent geological trends show sea levels slowly rising; don't panic. The Dutch have recovered more land than they've lost.

Climate change is real, climate change mitigation is a hoax and man made catastrophic climate change alarmism is pseudoscience. That's objectively true because there are no experimental tests for climate change mitigation. The verifiable qualities of prescription drugs are experimentally tested but climate quackery of restricting CO2 emissions or funding carbon sinks has never had that degree of scrutiny.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#25186 Apr 20, 2013
gcaveman1 wrote:
... Everyone here is getting used to your new name, lyin' brian.
Everyone on gcaveman1's side; we don't go in for name calling. Truth is more valuable than irrationality.
Bushwacker

Seattle, WA

#25187 Apr 20, 2013
If you're not a scientist, then performing the "experiment" would have no meaning for you, even if it were possible...

Perhaps, we could ask you to see if you can live without several organs ? I see you've started with your "brain", try your liver next.

Weak & stupid argument & you know it.
Bushwacked

Minneapolis, MN

#25188 Apr 20, 2013
Bushwacker wrote:
If you're not a scientist, then performing the "experiment" would have no meaning for you, even if it were possible...
Perhaps, we could ask you to see if you can live without several organs ? I see you've started with your "brain", try your liver next.
Weak & stupid argument & you know it.
I see the Gay Slewsie from Seattle is still spreading his lies on Topix.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#25189 Apr 20, 2013
[QUOTE who="lyin' brian"]I'm not a scientist, I don't design experiments.......[/QUOTE]

....... because it has errors of 1 million TIMES, 1000 TIMES, 3000 TIMES, 73 million TIMES, & 2.5+ trillion TIMES.

But 'lyin' brian' IS a 4-time alleged & 4-time proud threatener, also designing slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pigisms.
Kyle

Rensselaer, IN

#25190 Apr 20, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>I'm not a scientist, I don't design experiments that test theories for my living. I can't find an experimental test of man made global warming; can you cite one?
Not only that, you apparently never finished high school because the 5th grade conception of the scientific method that you insist upon would have been corrected.

Heck, you must have an IQ below 75, since the idiocy of your 5th grade conception of the scientific method has been refuted multiple times in this thread.

And perhaps your reading skills are lacking as well because you've never responded to the implications to other scientific fields of your 5th grade conception of the scientific method.

Perhaps you're merely an autistic parrot whose been taught to regurgitate this one failed argument without even knowing what it means.

Or perhaps you're paid to appear to be dumber than a sack of hammers to keep fooling your audience, which consists of people who can only aspire to being as smart as a sack of hammers.

You lose again, fool.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Devin nunes revelation 9 hr Space ace 6
The Quit Cash Challenge - Quit Smoking and Win ... (Sep '11) Wed Donna rhoda 32
Ellison Topix's Favorite Loser! Mar 21 Davycrockett 2
Depressed space ace finds comfort in fact he is... Mar 21 cowboy chris 2
Trump's ICE Declined Detainer Report Mar 21 cowboy chris 2
Minneapolis warming winters by 5 degrees in 20 ... Mar 21 cowboy chris 3
The tragic story of Minneapolis Mar 20 Phineous 9

Minneapolis Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Minneapolis Mortgages