Global warming 'undeniable,' scientis...

Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say

There are 35607 comments on the TwinCities.com story from Jul 29, 2010, titled Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say. In it, TwinCities.com reports that:

Scientists from around the world are providing even more evidence of global warming, one day after President Barack Obama renewed his call for climate legislation.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at TwinCities.com.

Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#24993 Apr 7, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>I'm not advocating treating the global climate; I've got nothing to test. Besides, I'm not a scientist.
I'm just asking, what's the most compelling experiment for climate change mitigation you've found? Until I find one, I'm going to wait before helping man made catastrophic climate change alarmism.
You want a test run, do it yourself... Oh right, you're not a scientist, so any test run would be beyond you anyway... Perfect sense, for an idiot.... Have you met moron PC ??? LMAOROTFU~!

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#24994 Apr 7, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
Bria its not necessary t tate the obvious, we all know that you are not a scientist, and that you have absolutely no clue about science. But rst assured, all scientists studying climate change know what the cause is and what the consequences will be if we don't change our behaviour. One does ot need to drink a quart of boubon to know what the effects will be.
The sad partabout the whole thing is that we may already be past the tipping point.
We are past the tipping point; Yipee!!!

There's no stopping it now, now we should enjoy it as much as possible because tomorrow we die. At least after the tipping point, mitigation is no longer the issue. Now we deal with the depression and trauma as best we can, and pray they snap out of it.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#24995 Apr 7, 2013
Bushwhacker wrote:
So, you want something for nothing, you're unwilling to do ?? Yep, teanagger...
I want something: a compelling experiment for climate change mitigation. Fo nothing, my opinion that selling untested snake oil is fraud and hoax.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#24996 Apr 7, 2013
Bushwhacker wrote:
You want a test run, do it yourself... Oh right, you're not a scientist, so any test run would be beyond you anyway... Perfect sense, for an idiot.... Have you met moron PC ??? LMAOROTFU~!
I want to read about it in the news, and decide if I want to buy the extract from a peer reviewed journal. Maybe they'll be follow up experiments and attempts to reproduce the original results.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#24997 Apr 7, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>I want something: a compelling experiment for climate change mitigation. Fo nothing, my opinion that selling untested snake oil is fraud and hoax.
You are a fraud and a hoax pusher.

All scientists are created equal. Climate scientists are no less in science.

But you are none in science.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#24998 Apr 7, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>You are a fraud and a hoax pusher.
All scientists are created equal. Climate scientists are no less in science.
But you are none in science.
Brian is paid to fill this forum with misinformation.

He does it by trolling.
A troll wants to cause a commotion and get people ranting and raving because they want their presence on a forum or comments thread to be the main focus. They want the spotlight and attention on them.

Often they will play devils advocate, vigorously defending statements or positions they know to be illogical or untrue in an attempt to get people riled up.
http://www.insidersedge.co.uk/lifestyletips/h...
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#24999 Apr 7, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>I want to read about it in the news, and decide if I want to buy the extract[sic] from a peer reviewed journal. Maybe they'll be follow up experiments and attempts to reproduce the original results.
What!

Extract? LOL.

The abstracts are free today.

So why is nobody doing it your way? Because your way is WRONG. You are WRONG.

This is your way of having a job. A liar against science!
Dont drink the koolaid

Eden Prairie, MN

#25000 Apr 7, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Very interesting, would you please cite one?
http://m.youtube.com/watch...
Kyle

Rensselaer, IN

#25001 Apr 7, 2013
LYIN' BRIAN -“Learn the difference between an experiment and history, experiments are pre planned, controlled and have the goal of testing a theory. What's the most compelling experiment you've seen?”

Yes, yes, yes, we know you’re not a scientist; you don’t have to beat that dead horse by displaying your gross scientific illiteracy. Here’s a couple of ways you’re dead wrong:

1) Rejection of historical sciences - If you reject climate science on the basis of it being an historical science, then may we presume that you reject all of the historical sciences? Evolution? Geology? Paleontology? Astronomy? Astrophysics?

2) Defining science as ONLY single factor controlled experiments – ALREADY EXPLAINED THIS ONCE, MORON, SO PAY ATTENTION THIS TIME. I’ve personally designed and executed experiments with several independent variables, some of which I couldn’t control, yet I was able to extract not only the contributions of each to each response variable, I was able to determine the effects of the interactions between two variables – sometimes even three way interactions. This is std stuff. Piece of cake. Done every day in 100’s of different fields. YOUR IGNORANCE IS NOT AN ARGUMENT!

http://www.carboeurope.org/education/CS_Mater ...

Simplistic table top experiments for school children impress you? Why didn’t you say so; I thought you insisted on planetary scale testing. No problem then; every conceivable aspect of the physics has been examined, beginning 150 yrs ago.

LYIN' BRIAN -“Check them out, maybe you'll learn ad hoc fossil fuel use over time since the industrial revolution isn't an experiment.”

Read an effin’ book, maybe you’ll learn that your simplistic, limited, 5th grade concept of science is RETARDED.

“I'm impressed with the data's extremely low CO2 temperature effect.”

I’m impressed (not) by your reading comprehension, considering that YOUR LINK said in the SECOND SENTENCE,“Only qualitative conclusions are drawn from the experimental results, and these are critically and carefully applied to climate related issues.”

For the hard of thinking – QUALITATIVE MEANS NOT QUANTITATIVE. D_O__Y_O_U__U_N_D_E_R_S_T_A_N_ D__T_H_E__W_O_R_D_S__T_H_A_T__ I_’_M__T_Y_P_I_N_G, YOU SIMPERING TWIT?
Kyle

Rensselaer, IN

#25002 Apr 7, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>We are past the tipping point; Yipee!!!
There's no stopping it now, now we should enjoy it as much as possible because tomorrow we die. At least after the tipping point, mitigation is no longer the issue. Now we deal with the depression and trauma as best we can, and pray they snap out of it.
You're a effin' azzhole.
Kyle

Rensselaer, IN

#25003 Apr 7, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>I want something: a compelling experiment for climate change mitigation. Fo nothing, my opinion that selling untested snake oil is fraud and hoax.
Why do you ignore the psots in which I refuted your nonsense? Respond. Tell us on what grounds you think yourself smarter than a million PHD's, after repeatedly confessing to knowing squat about science.

I explained exactly how we know, by multiple means, that man is producing orders of magnitude greater CO2 than the normal production rate. I POSTED SCIENCE, JACKBAG! On what grounds do you reject it?

I explained in detail four different ways that the data clearly shows that the warming can only be caused by the GH effect. Do you reject that science? On what grounds, jackbag?!

You made, by clear implication, the following recent excuses for denying the science:

1) Just maybe 99+% of purchased fossil fuels are horded instead of burned.

2) Just maybe several cubic miles of undetected oil seeps out of the sea floor each year.

3) Just maybe humans produce CO2 that is magically 99+% weaker than other CO2 in its GH properties.

4) I've forgotten the 4th one - probably because my brain recoiled in horror from the ooze that your brain produces. I'm sure you can refresh our memory. What was it, Lyin' Brian?

And why do you run from your asinine excuses for denial? You started out a proud science denier; now you hide in shame from your insane arguments.
anon

Minneapolis, MN

#25004 Apr 7, 2013
Kyle wrote:
<quoted text>
You're a effin' azzhole.
No one cares what you think.
including your views on global warming.

Infact I would place all you alarmists on an island and emit enough co2 so you can be neighbors with lobsters.
anon

Minneapolis, MN

#25005 Apr 7, 2013
Only use you alarmists have on topix is to be trolled for entertainment.
Dont drink the koolaid

Eden Prairie, MN

#25006 Apr 8, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Very interesting, would you please cite one?
http://pubs.aic.ca/doi/pdf/10.4141/cjps78-119
Dont drink the koolaid

Eden Prairie, MN

#25007 Apr 8, 2013
Dont drink the koolaid

Eden Prairie, MN

#25008 Apr 8, 2013
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j....

There are many more... This is not to suggest that the science is robust. It is just the best science has... so far.
Dont drink the koolaid

Eden Prairie, MN

#25009 Apr 8, 2013
http://geology.gsapubs.org/content/30/7/607.f...

THE results of this experiment enlightens Mankind to what is required to Save the Earth from CO2... but will cost $25.00.

Reminds me of those CRU forecasters in Norwich, England, who said they would share the data which shows the World that CO2 will destroy civilization... but unfortunately THAT information is PROPRIETARY. Sorry folks, Our hands are tied.

Yes. I guess that makes sense.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#25011 Apr 8, 2013
Kyle wrote:
LYIN' BRIAN -
I like your name for 'brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver'...... accurate, concise, altho lacking in full descriptive flavor of the wretchedness it puts out. It should not be capitalized either. Yes, I think I'll call it,'lyin' brian', too.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#25012 Apr 8, 2013
[QUOTE who="lyin' brian"].....cause tomorrow we die.[/QUOTE]

Philosophy of 'lyin' brian' with nothin' else. Such a philosophy allows "lyin' brian" to be a slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AND 4-time alleged & 4-time proud threatener. Such a philosophy allowed "lyin' brian", NOT to have science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra & pre-calc in its poorly earned hi skule DEE-plooomaa & no science & mathematics degrees. It allowed "lyin' brian" to make purposeful "lyin' brian" errors of 1 million TIMES, 1000 TIMES, 3000 TIMES & 73 million TIMES.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#25013 Apr 8, 2013
Bushwhacker wrote:
to coolaid:

How cute, the moniker changing child.... is spamming sites IT doesn't understand ! LMAOROTFU~! GROW UP, be something closer to an adult.
You are correct!

It posted about Hermann Flohn without realizing the man was the Einstein of climate change.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Get Over It! 9 hr Drumpf 9
Obama & BLM mourn monstor Fidel Castro 18 hr Protesters CAN WORK 50
Drop one word....add one word game (Apr '14) Fri WildLifeLover 626
Child sex ring>Pizzagate>Clinton's>Obama's>FBI ... Dec 1 Georgia 1
News Cops To Drunk Drivers: We'll Make You Listen To... Nov 30 Ferrerman 20
BLM urge rioting over OSU SHOOTING Nov 30 Drumpf 14
Trump Won The Popular Vote Nov 29 Obamas comments 3

Minneapolis Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Minneapolis Mortgages