Global warming 'undeniable,' scientis...

Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say

There are 34401 comments on the TwinCities.com story from Jul 29, 2010, titled Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say. In it, TwinCities.com reports that:

Scientists from around the world are providing even more evidence of global warming, one day after President Barack Obama renewed his call for climate legislation.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at TwinCities.com.

Amused Slew

Minneapolis, MN

#24815 Mar 29, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
You use unreasonable arguments in an attempt to get an emotional response. Mostly you get rational explanations of why your arguments are unreasonable, but also people point out that repeating them endlessly makes you a troll, which is a reasonable argument.
Where we differ is you are disingenuous and the people who respond to you are honest.
No he doesn't.
I've seen nothing but character attacks from your side of the argument.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#24816 Mar 29, 2013
PHD2 wrote:
So spring 2012 was warmer than average AND the experts said it was evidence of Global Warming.
Spring of 2013 is colder than average and the experts claim it's more evidence of Global Warming.
WHICH IS IT?
You can't have it both ways!!
Science is full of apparent contradictions.

*Normal* warmer temperatures are an indication of global warming.

*Anomalous* colder temperatures may be evidence of warming *if* the mechanism is described.

Normal winter temperatures are increasing; anomalous colder temperatures due to Arctic cold being pushed south are also occurring as Arctic sea ice declines influencing weather patterns.

Both were predicted before the event.

If you're looking for simple, science isn't it.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#24817 Mar 29, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
<quoted text>
No he doesn't.
I've seen nothing but character attacks from your side of the argument.
Possibly due to your not being able to spot an unreasonable argument.

"You constantly demand an experiment even though experiments are not part of observational science therefore you are a troll" may seem like a character attack if the words before "you are a troll" have no meaning for you.
Amused Slew

Minneapolis, MN

#24818 Mar 29, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Possibly due to your not being able to spot an unreasonable argument.
"You constantly demand an experiment even though experiments are not part of observational science therefore you are a troll" may seem like a character attack if the words before "you are a troll" have no meaning for you.
Your lack of respect for others point of view speaks volumes about how you define what is reasonable or unreasonable.
PHD2

Minneapolis, MN

#24819 Mar 29, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Science is full of apparent contradictions.
*Normal* warmer temperatures are an indication of global warming.
*Anomalous* colder temperatures may be evidence of warming *if* the mechanism is described.
Normal winter temperatures are increasing; anomalous colder temperatures due to Arctic cold being pushed south are also occurring as Arctic sea ice declines influencing weather patterns.
Both were predicted before the event.
If you're looking for simple, science isn't it.
OK I'll forget it.

But if you view temps at the north and south poles they are both very cold.
Amused Slew

Minneapolis, MN

#24820 Mar 29, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Possibly due to your not being able to spot an unreasonable argument.
"You constantly demand an experiment even though experiments are not part of observational science therefore you are a troll" may seem like a character attack if the words before "you are a troll" have no meaning for you.
Seems like anyone who disagrees with you is a troll.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#24821 Mar 29, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
<quoted text>
Your lack of respect for others point of view speaks volumes about how you define what is reasonable or unreasonable.
Why should I respect people who do not post in good faith?

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#24822 Mar 29, 2013
PHD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
OK I'll forget it.
But if you view temps at the north and south poles they are both very cold.
Obviously you don't actually view the temps at the north pole, co they ain't.

http://www.scilogs.de/wblogs/gallery/16/previ...

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#24823 Mar 29, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
<quoted text>
Seems like anyone who disagrees with you is a troll.
Er, no.
Amused Slew

Minneapolis, MN

#24824 Mar 29, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Why should I respect people who do not post in good faith?
Cause if you dont, you discredit yourself, regardless of the intentions of others.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#24825 Mar 29, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
<quoted text>
Cause if you dont, you discredit yourself, regardless of the intentions of others.
That's the intention of others, of course.
Amused Slew

Minneapolis, MN

#24826 Mar 29, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
That's the intention of others, of course.
Again...your conviction that anyone who disagrees with you has an ulterior motive speaks volumes about what you consider reasonable or unreasonable.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#24827 Mar 29, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
<quoted text>
Again...your conviction that anyone who disagrees with you has an ulterior motive speaks volumes about what you consider reasonable or unreasonable.
Straw man.
Amused Slew

Minneapolis, MN

#24828 Mar 29, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Straw man.
I'm sorry you feel that way.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#24829 Mar 29, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sorry you feel that way.
Rather irrelevant as you fail to comprehend the reasons.
Capt Crunch

Cottonwood, AZ

#24830 Mar 29, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
<quoted text>
Again...your conviction that anyone who disagrees with you has an ulterior motive speaks volumes about what you consider reasonable or unreasonable.
Pure drivel!
Amused Slew

Minneapolis, MN

#24831 Mar 29, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Rather irrelevant as you fail to comprehend the reasons.
If that's how you feel, I dont see how anything I say can be relevant to you.
Capt Crunch

Cottonwood, AZ

#24832 Mar 29, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
<quoted text>
If that's how you feel, I dont see how anything I say can be relevant to you.
Pure drivel!

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#24833 Mar 29, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
<quoted text>
If that's how you feel, I dont see how anything I say can be relevant to you.
Your not seeing it is not proof of its non-existence.

You might be blind, after all.
Amused Slew

Minneapolis, MN

#24834 Mar 29, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Your not seeing it is not proof of its non-existence.
You might be blind, after all.
Maybe, maybe not
Just stating my perspective

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Jordana Green 52 min doubtful 9
Pimples and white people 1 hr TOASTER 28
Bicyclist hit br trailer to be charged 2 hr Oh well 2
Dr. Walter James Palmer 3 hr Oh well 12
St. Paul Robber Shot! 4 hr Oh well 3
Another white boy shooting innocent people again 5 hr crunch 31
News Chemical-free swimming pool to open in North Mi... 7 hr Tellitlikeitis 54
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Minneapolis Mortgages