Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say

Full story: TwinCities.com

Scientists from around the world are providing even more evidence of global warming, one day after President Barack Obama renewed his call for climate legislation.
Comments
23,141 - 23,160 of 32,402 Comments Last updated 5 hrs ago
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24431
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Brian_G wrote:
We reject climate change mitigation because it is a novel, untested prototype. It might not work, it might make things worse, it's never been tried.
Would you buy a used car without seeing it, hearing it run or taking it out for a test drive?
No one has ever experimentally captured or released greenhouse gas into the air and measured a temperature change. That's a good clue, it's a hoax.
"No one has ever experimentally captured or released greenhouse gas into the air and measured a temperature change?"

Wake up, liar. Released! Measured!

Status: Nowadays 90,000,000 tons of man-made CO2 are emitted daily and the temperatures are still measured all over.

Shame on you.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24432
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Brian_G wrote:
We don't want our governments to tell us what to drive or try to mitigate climate change. We'll show them, in November.
And that was 2008 election.

Did you show them?
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24433
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Poor Brain Gone, slept through the recent election and spamming is the only solution ???
PHD

Overton, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24434
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>"No one has ever experimentally captured or released greenhouse gas into the air and measured a temperature change?"
Wake up, liar. Released! Measured!
Status: Nowadays 90,000,000 tons of man-made CO2 are emitted daily and the temperatures are still measured all over.
Shame on you.
Yes you are correct they did measure man made CO2 by the scientific science fiction method. Now put on your big boy/girl pants and show all your peer reviewed published REAL SCIENCE work or go away and shut your pie hole.
Kyle

Knox, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24435
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

PHD wrote:
<quoted text>Yes you are correct they did measure man made CO2 by the scientific science fiction method. Now put on your big boy/girl pants and show all your peer reviewed published REAL SCIENCE work or go away and shut your pie hole.
Not even the most dishonest/deranged science denier questions that the increased CO2 output is man made. All you need do is some simple math to calculate the amount produced by the burning of the known qty's fuels used
Where the hell is YOUR SCIENCE?! ANY SCIENCE?!

Knowing that you're incapable of science - even referencing it in any way - I preemptively accept your 134th consecutive concession.
Will Not fly on a 787

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24436
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Damn it's COLD!!

10-15 degrees colder than average.

Global WARMING?

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24437
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

SpaceBlues wrote:
"No one has ever experimentally captured or released greenhouse gas into the air and measured a temperature change?" Wake up, liar. Released! Measured! Status: Nowadays 90,000,000 tons of man-made CO2 are emitted daily and the temperatures are still measured all over. Shame on you.
Our CO2 emissions aren't an experiment; most alarmists don't understand science so they can't make rational judgments about it.

When they learn how experiments are used to refine theory and see there are no experimental tests of climate change mitigation; they'll know better.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24438
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Our CO2 emissions aren't an experiment; most alarmists don't understand science so they can't make rational judgments about it.
When they learn how experiments are used to refine theory and see there are no experimental tests of climate change mitigation; they'll know better.
Actually, your arrogance is astounding. If you knew science, you would recognize the posters with science education, training, and experience from their posts.

Your comment is absolutely nonsense. Hey stay that way, a box of rocks like your buddy ph'd.

The GHG physics is science that you don't understand along with the rest of science and mathematics.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24439
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Kyle wrote:
<quoted text>to ph'd:

Not even the most dishonest/deranged science denier questions that the increased CO2 output is man made. All you need do is some simple math to calculate the amount produced by the burning of the known qty's fuels used.
Where the hell is YOUR SCIENCE?! ANY SCIENCE?!
Knowing that you're incapable of science - even referencing it in any way - I preemptively accept your 134th consecutive concession.
I agree.

You express precisely and impressively. Thanks for our lesson.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24440
Mar 17, 2013
 
SpaceBlues wrote:
Actually, your arrogance is astounding. If you knew science, you would recognize the posters with science education, training, and experience from their posts. Your comment is absolutely nonsense. Hey stay that way, a box of rocks like your buddy ph'd. The GHG physics is science that you don't understand along with the rest of science and mathematics.
Does SpaceBlues believe our greenhouse gas emissions are an experimental test of global warming, like Fair Game? If so, he knows as little about the experimental method as Fair Game.
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24441
Mar 17, 2013
 
Just whining about an experiment, then you'd complain about the comparison... Go find a dog and walk it, you're more useful doing menial tasks.....

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24442
Mar 17, 2013
 
Kyle wrote:
Not even the most dishonest/deranged science denier questions that the increased CO2 output is man made. All you need do is some simple math to calculate the amount produced by the burning of the known qty's fuels used Where the hell is YOUR SCIENCE?! ANY SCIENCE?! Knowing that you're incapable of science - even referencing it in any way - I preemptively accept your 134th consecutive concession.
Even if you measured worldwide, how much fuel people used or stored, how much wood, pete and organic waste was burned, that wouldn't tell how that compares to natural sources. There'd still be no way to compare man's CO2 emissions from CO2 effervesced from the oceans as they warm and CO2 emissions for geological sources.

Coincidence isn't causality.
Will Not fly on a 787

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24443
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Man it's cold!!

HOW could mans activity be warming the earth AND the earth gets colder?


AND all this warming krap is based on recordered history of weather, which is a drop in the bucket in terms of earths existance.
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24444
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Man it's warm, are you sick or just sitting ALL DAY ???
PHD

Overton, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24445
Mar 18, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Kyle wrote:
<quoted text>
Not even the most dishonest/deranged science denier questions that the increased CO2 output is man made. All you need do is some simple math to calculate the amount produced by the burning of the known qty's fuels used
Where the hell is YOUR SCIENCE?! ANY SCIENCE?!
Knowing that you're incapable of science - even referencing it in any way - I preemptively accept your 134th consecutive concession.
Wrong again you engineered the Auto Ind. into bankruptcy specialist. They only thing that is possible would be you apologizing to that pay for profit school you attended for wasting class room time.
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24446
Mar 18, 2013
 
Phd="If you most lie...."

You make it EZ, to disregard your claptrap.

The next time you address the topic, will be the first. Please seek help.
litesong

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24447
Mar 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

[QUOTE who="can get 90+passengermiles/gal on 787 "]Man it's cold!![/QUOTE]

The unpopulated North Pole is cold with 6 months of darkness. Presently, lots of warm fronts push into the Arctic & flush lots of cold to populated southern regions.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24448
Mar 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Even if you measured worldwide, how much fuel people used or stored, how much wood, pete and organic waste was burned, that wouldn't tell how that compares to natural sources. There'd still be no way to compare man's CO2 emissions from CO2 effervesced from the oceans as they warm and CO2 emissions for geological sources.
Coincidence isn't causality.
Why don't you try learning some science? There IS a way to tell when CO2 is from the burning of fossil fuels.

Ever hear of isotope ratios? The CO2 that humans have emitted by burning FFs is ancient carbon, depleted of C-13 & C-14. CO2 from most other sources is not depleted this way. That's one of the ways we know that the rise in CO2 we've seen since the 1800s is entirely anthropogenic in origin.

We are not doing a conscious experiment by raising atmospheric CO2. We are INADVERTENTLY doing that very, very dangerous experiment on the only home we have.
Wake up

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24449
Mar 18, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

GOD Says It's
Global Freezing And Global Scorching
Not Global Warming!

http://www.alamoministries.com/Newsletters/07...
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24450
Mar 18, 2013
 
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Does SpaceBlues believe our greenhouse gas emissions are an experimental test of global warming, like Fair Game? If so, he knows as little about the experimental method as Fair Game.
You could be called funny if you weren't serious. But you are so silly to judge others for science when you have none.

It's like talking to a crazy man about science. You make no sense but you think you do.

Where do you get your confidence? Why don't you switch now to medicine and treat cancer?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Debate: Ferguson - Minneapolis, MN 5 hr NSNovum 70
American Douglas McAuthur McCain Dies Fighting ... 6 hr Einer Joe Hansen ... 2
Young, female American aid worker being held by... 8 hr Cut It Off 7
Profile: Michael Brown a 'little kid in a big b... 8 hr Capt Crunch 16
Al Sharpton, White House officials attend Micha... 9 hr redeemer 10
Religion of peace 11 hr Einer Joe Hansen ... 21
"naawp darren wilson legal defence fund" 12 hr NAAWP - 2014 1

Search the Minneapolis Forum:
•••
•••
•••

Minneapolis Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Minneapolis News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Minneapolis
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••