Global warming 'undeniable,' scientis...

Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say

There are 35583 comments on the story from Jul 29, 2010, titled Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say. In it, reports that:

Scientists from around the world are providing even more evidence of global warming, one day after President Barack Obama renewed his call for climate legislation.

Join the discussion below, or


Rensselaer, IN

#24258 Mar 9, 2013
Ralph wrote:
<quoted text>
OK but it still seems strange if the earth was warming by mans activity it would ever cool down at all. I'd expect it to continue to warm and the warming would accelerate NOT cool down.

I suppose that it should be hotter every day than the day before. What a mental midget.

Are the rest of you deniers proud of the company you keep?

Rensselaer, IN

#24259 Mar 9, 2013
joey wrote:
so all you global warming nuts should leave and go to another planet and take gore with you.gores millions made from this hoax has turned into a billion plus but you aholes still suck his ass?yes,you are the liberals that believe what you hear from the lame stream media?
No, moron, I suggest that all of you denier nuts should leave and go to another planet and take the Koch brothers with you. Koch's BILLIONS made aholes like you think science is a hoax but you aholes still suck his ass? yes,you are the teabaggers that believe what you hear from the objectively (proven) dishonest teabagger media complex.

I'll be you're a creationist, too and think Rush is literally right, and that Beck is sane, and that Hannity is honest.

As a true conservative, I can tell you they're all some combo of sold-out and insane. Read a book.

Everett, WA

#24260 Mar 9, 2013
Ralph wrote:
Sheepie........ mindless sheepie....
More toxic topix AGW deniers show too much interest in sheep, specially sheep bottoms.

Rensselaer, IN

#24261 Mar 9, 2013
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>Actually your not an expert on anything. Well my bad you are an expert on Scientific science fiction and scare tactics.
The only thing you show any expertise in is bare assertions, insults, and meaningless blather.

Since this is a science topic and since you have a very adamant view on the science, maybe you should show us some of your expertise in SCIENCE. Post some SCIENCE that supports your views.

I know that you won't, so I accept your concession. Having conceded, go away.

Or continue to post on your actual areas of expertise, emphasizing that you've not only conceded, but are incapable of mounting an argument at all and are so dishonest/insane that you can't accept that fact.

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#24262 Mar 9, 2013
Could all of the space debry that falls back to earth have anything to do with the ozone layer problem? What about all of the rockets that burn through to outer space to send stuff that will eventually come back down ?
Actually the Earth rise in temperatures is caused by the weakening magnetic force field of Earth allowing sun flares more impact on our climate.

Nothin about SUV's nor asthma inhalers killing polar bears.

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#24263 Mar 9, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>I didn't say when the sky would fall, but in 2010, I pointed out the following about falling ice:

The recently collapsed Wilkens Ice Shelf was estimated 10,000 years old.
The recently collapsed Ward Hunt Ice Shelf was estimated 4500 years old.
The recently collapsed Larsen B Ice Shelf was estimated 12.000 years old.

All collapsed within 7 years of each other.
4500 years old..........7 years
10,000 years old.......7 years
12,000 years old.......7 years
The Sun is hotter than an asthma inhaler. Should we also ban the Sun?

Liberals care so much about the kids that they made asthma inhalers possession a federal crime punishable by imprison. Yes, those inhalers do save kids but they kill Liberal protected polar bears, which is worst, Liberals claim.

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#24264 Mar 9, 2013
Kyle wrote:

Doubling down on demented conspiracist diversionary attempts fools no one. Post some science or concede honestly.
You evaded the point, liberal SOP.

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#24265 Mar 9, 2013
Kyle wrote:
<quoted text>You failed completely yet again. When can we expect your honest concession?

Response to idiocy of idiotic argument that climate changed before = non-existent

Response to my rebuttal regarding the incredible stupidity of your chosen mythical conspiracy vs the unhidden "conspiracy" that's behind your denialism = non-existent

Robotic repitition of loony conspiracy claims anyway = dishonest form of concession

More politics; still NO SCIENCE = dishonest concession

Accusations that IM liberal though I've already told you my views = dogmatic narrow -mindedness

Calls GW a hoax in all caps; once again mistaking bare assertion for a logical argument = dumber than a sack of hammers
Stop calling me names and show me a non-Liberals scientists pro GW and I will listen.

So far, every single GW alarmist being a socialists hack!

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#24266 Mar 9, 2013
Kyle wrote:
<quoted text>FACTS:

The number is more like 98%.

The other 2% are almost entirely people who quibble about one or two minor conclusions.

The handful of actually qualified climate scientists who actually believe as you do are exactly like Roy Spencer, who I've already discredited so thoroughly that you dishonest morons that brought him up refuse to discuss him now.

Science content that refutes the mountains of published, peer-reviewed science that essentially 99.99% of those who know best all agree upon = ZERO .... AS ALWAYS!
Liberals destroy anyone who disagrees!

Typical Liberal Standard operation procedure!

If you guys spend more time doing real unbiased science work instead of spending 98% of your time attacking the objective scientists then the real numbers will show up.

Global Warming Petition

31,487 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,029 with PhDs


Minneapolis, MN

#24267 Mar 9, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>The warming trend will accelerate as seen already.
Read my posts again. Cooling down is not mentioned with regard to the global climate change..
"The warming trend will accelerate as seen already."

But But But, THIS WINTER is below (COOLER) than normal in Minnesota...

Do you have a logical response?

BTW, you can take all your PHDs and remember they all have opinions just like everyone else.

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#24268 Mar 9, 2013
US Huh wrote:
Scientist at the Institute of John Q Public have determined that the cause of global warming has been attributed to one geographical area on Earth. That place is D.C. Scientist have found very telling evidence of a large output of hot gases emanating from the Capitol Building and the White House. Scientist conclude that the only way to reverse the trend is with one simple solution- throwout all the incumbents.
Start with the Liberals!

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#24269 Mar 9, 2013
Kyle wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, I could, but even if you could understand it, you would not accept it because you're a dogmatic ideologue. BTW, you've never asked me this incredibly lame diversionary question before, so why make it seem like I refused to answer?

That said, I do refuse .... precisely because it's an incredibly lame diversionary tactic to avoid your utter failure.

Can you post any actual science that supports your denial? Hmmm?
When I preheat my oven to 350 degrees Fahrenheit, I sometimes, not always but few times, found it made blocks of ice.

I am planing to replace my ice dispenser for my oven.

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#24270 Mar 9, 2013
Kyle wrote:
<quoted text>I did find it tedious that you repeated unsupported and ridiculously improbable CT (How did Gore corrupt every competent climate scientist into falsifying all of the published, peer-reviewed science and every national science academy on the planet?) while completely ignoring the openly available information regarding the origins and funding of denial.

And your inability to post science or concede is getting damn tedious, too. ;o)
Are all GW alarmist socialist, communist or Liberals?

Can you show me a real conservative who is also an GW alarmist?

What happened to the year 2,000 mass hunger you guys predicted?

See? You guys predicted back in the 70's that by the year 2000, there will be shortage of necessary metals for hospital equipment, food processing, life support, medicine, transportation, cooking, well being, survival, etc!

Capitalist predicted the OPPOSITE! Shortage of metals mean higher prices so greater motivation to explore and mine metals!

Who was right?

We Conservatives were right as always!

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#24271 Mar 9, 2013
Kyle wrote:
<quoted text>Political ideology has ZERO effect on validity of science. The subject of the thread is GW; all the infantile attempts to conflated your many distractions with the science are not only tiresome, they serve to show the vacuity of denier science.
Do you agree with banning asthma inhaler to kids to stop global warning?

Yes, No, or I am clueless!

A simple question deserves a simple answer, except when asked to a Liberal.

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#24272 Mar 9, 2013
WTF wrote:
<quoted text>Money sometimes is a good tool to use when trying to influence someone. Al Gore would know that to, being a fat cat DC politician.
For twenty millions I would also lie about Global Warming!

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#24273 Mar 9, 2013
Kyle wrote:
<quoted text>One or two claim to do so.

Thousands actually know that it's incredibly well supported science with thousands of peer reviewed, published studies looking at it from many, many angles.

Your use of Argument by Bare Assertion = a very clear concession that you couldn't formulate a valid argument with a gun to your head.

What a complete loser! Keep posting, dude; you're our secret weapon; exposing denial for the idiocy that it is.
Kyle said "One or two claim to do so."

Facts: 31,487 to be exact and growing!

You are factually wrong! stop watching MSNBC, they are lying to you!

Minneapolis, MN

#24274 Mar 9, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
When I preheat my oven to 350 degrees Fahrenheit, I sometimes, not always but few times, found it made blocks of ice.
I am planing to replace my ice dispenser for my oven.
Reminds me of those GREEN evenings when we are supposed to turn OFF all our electrical appliances.

Irritates my wife but I go around and turn EVERYTHING ON!!

You know electric ovens, heaters, microwave, toaster, arc welder, vacume, etc..

I enjoy seeing all the GREENIES in the area turning off their lights. Meanwhile my oven burns as much as a blocks lights.
Rich Slew

Seattle, WA

#24275 Mar 9, 2013
It's would be "block's" and you're clearly a complete idiot, under every moniker.

United States

#24276 Mar 9, 2013
Vacuum, not "vacume."
Rich Slew

Seattle, WA

#24278 Mar 9, 2013
Ralph wrote:
<quoted text>
OK, so earth is being warmed by human activity.
So why has the Minnesota winter been colder than normal?
It's easy to claim the earth is burning up getting hotter each year then how can it magically cool down this year?
Overall, winters have warmed about two to four degrees in the past 30 years or so. One good way to measure it is to look at these number of subzero lows that we're seeing at night. There are distinct trends that are emerging in the past 30 to 40 years toward fewer subzero low temperatures in Minnesota and the Twin Cities.

Quick example: this year we've had five days so far, last year we had three. That's a very low number. If you go back to the 1970s - the whole decade - we had 444 subzero days. During the 1980s we had 280, during the 1990s we had 256; down to 198 in the 2000s. That's a 57% drop in those subzero nights. If you look at that overall the trend lines show we could be down to around 10 on average per winter. We used to average about 30 back in the '70s and we could be maybe closer to zero by 2040. By 2040, in the Twin Cities we could be very close to few or any subzero nights if our current climate trends continue.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Can't manage the gov & NOT honest or trustworthy (Nov '13) 1 hr LIbEralS 560
Definition of Liberal 20 hr cantmakeitup 1
Wikileaks highlights 21 hr LIbEralS 35
Trump is Totally Unqualified Tue Honor Student 5
News Chelsea Clinton rallies the faithful in Twin Ci... (Feb '16) Oct 15 Stop Sr Discrimin... 49
Bill clinton a rapist but liberals excuse it. Oct 14 huh 27
Dayton admits obamacare disaster Oct 14 Trump 2 Clinton 0 5

Minneapolis Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Minneapolis Mortgages