Global warming 'undeniable,' scientis...

Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say

There are 34383 comments on the TwinCities.com story from Jul 29, 2010, titled Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say. In it, TwinCities.com reports that:

Scientists from around the world are providing even more evidence of global warming, one day after President Barack Obama renewed his call for climate legislation.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at TwinCities.com.

redeemer

Minneapolis, MN

#24127 Mar 4, 2013
Capt Crunch wrote:
<quoted text>
Related? Lord, I hope not! All of my relatives that I am aware of, are content to enjoy what Gaia has provided, without getting our pants wet worrying about climate change, or such.It has changed multiple times in the past and we are still here. No, our biggest
enjoyment comes from reading the nissives from the ersatz jigger above, who is a local degenerate of may names. And, BTW, I notice that most of the raging going on, is from the caterwauling Progressives who fave latched on to this latest bugaboo.
may names?WTF kind of lingo do you speak beetch?
Capt Crunch

Sedona, AZ

#24128 Mar 4, 2013
redeemer wrote:
<quoted text>
may names?WTF kind of lingo do you speak beetch?
Our biggest enjoyment comes from reading the nissives from the ersatz jigger above, who is a local degenerate of many names.

“Impeach Obama!”

Since: Jul 08

Memphis, TN

#24129 Mar 4, 2013
Stopping the Keystone Pipeline will neither stop global warming nor stop the extraction of petroleum from the tarsands in Canada. The Keystone Pipeline will provide jobs for thousands and reduce dependence on petroleum producers in Saudi Arabia. Let us not forget that Saudi Arabia, while mostly an "ally" of the United States, is nevertheless a theocratic dictatorship just as bad in many ways, if not worse, than Iran.
Kyle

United States

#24131 Mar 5, 2013
Capt Crunch wrote:
<quoted text>
It has changed multiple times in the past and we are still here.
That's one of the top ten most egregiously fallacious denier "arguments". How you wingnuts construe it as an argument against the science is beyond me; I'm not irrational enough to guess the cognitive errors required.
Kyle

United States

#24132 Mar 5, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
You have a lot to learn son!
Had you decoded the DNA strains? Do you know who wrote that four bit code?
Do you believe in parallel universes?

(Steaming heap of obviously desperate attempts to distract from losing argument)

So? Do you believe in parallel universes? Yes or Not?
No, son, you're going to answer my questions and cease the evasions.

Do you admit that your source for cherry-picked "expert" opinion is a full fledged creatard? Don't continue to deliberately confuse the existence of God with denial of infinite, concilient facts of biological evolution.

Do you admit that anyone who can deny the infinite evidence of evolution is not rational enough to deserve to be called a scientist?

Do you admit that such a dogmatic science denier is the worst possible source for your cherry-picked Argument from Authority?(A compound fallacy to begin with!)
Ralph

Saint Paul, MN

#24133 Mar 5, 2013
More cold weather/proof of Global Warming..

IF man was heating the earth it would NEVER get colder.

NEVER!
liBeRALs

Minneapolis, MN

#24134 Mar 5, 2013
Ralph wrote:
More cold weather/proof of Global Warming..
IF man was heating the earth it would NEVER get colder.
NEVER!
Another alcohol-induced reality from Schmahl.

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#24135 Mar 6, 2013
Capt Crunch wrote:
<quoted text>Some %90 of "scientists" of a bygone age beleived that the Earth was flat and that phlogistan burned in fire. Even today, some political "scientists" beleive that socialism is a viable alternative to capitalism.
BINGO!

They see the financial success of AT&T, Microsoft, Apple, Exon-Mobile, Walt Disney, Hollywood, etc.
And STILL they claim capitalism had absolutely NOTHING to do with it!

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#24136 Mar 6, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Not true. You are confusing the church with nonexisting scientists.

What's your problem? Are you a stinking polluter of our air and water?
Did you know that Conservatives cares more about the environment that Liberals?

Drive-by a Liberal infected ghetto and you will see!

Tea Party rallies leave the parks CLEANER than it was before, but look at Al Sharpton's rallies, trash everywhere. Pun intended!

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#24137 Mar 6, 2013
Philliproy wrote:
Stopping the Keystone Pipeline will neither stop global warming nor stop the extraction of petroleum from the tarsands in Canada. The Keystone Pipeline will provide jobs for thousands and reduce dependence on petroleum producers in Saudi Arabia. Let us not forget that Saudi Arabia, while mostly an "ally" of the United States, is nevertheless a theocratic dictatorship just as bad in many ways, if not worse, than Iran.
Obama was put in office by Saudi Arabia. How do you expect him to go against his masters?

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#24138 Mar 6, 2013
Kyle wrote:
<quoted text>That's one of the top ten most egregiously fallacious denier "arguments". How you wingnuts construe it as an argument against the science is beyond me; I'm not irrational enough to guess the cognitive errors required.
Why do you still believe the Earth is flat and in Global Warming?

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#24139 Mar 6, 2013
Ralph wrote:
More cold weather/proof of Global Warming..

IF man was heating the earth it would NEVER get colder.

NEVER!
I keep finding blocks of ice on my 350 degrees oven!!!
Kyle

United States

#24140 Mar 6, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama was put in office by Saudi Arabia. How do you expect him to go against his masters?
It's answers like this that emphasize your total lack of valid arguments. Keep it up. You're your own worst enemy.
Kyle

United States

#24141 Mar 6, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you still believe the Earth is flat and in Global Warming?
Thanks for the concession that you can't even attempt to find a valid argument in the lame denier "climate changed before" BS. I accept it. Don't use it again. If you were intellectually honest, you would fall out other deniers when they use it. BIG "if", of course.
Ralph

Minneapolis, MN

#24142 Mar 6, 2013
I wonder why 90-plus percent of climate researchers and meteorologists believe that global warming is occurring, and that man is contributing to that warming?

Obviously, we'd be better served taking the word of a bigoted teabagger over the opinion of all these scientists.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#24143 Mar 6, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you know that Conservatives cares more about the environment that Liberals?
Drive-by a Liberal infected ghetto and you will see!
Tea Party rallies leave the parks CLEANER than it was before, but look at Al Sharpton's rallies, trash everywhere. Pun intended!
Does it itch in your brain that you lie so much!!

You have not posted one correct thing.
Kyle

United States

#24144 Mar 6, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
I keep finding blocks of ice on my 350 degrees oven!!!
We get it already, dude. You've got nothing but blowhard blather. You haven't presented anything remotely close to meaningful .... well, ever, as far as I can see. But keep posting more than everyone else combined so as to continue illustrating the irrational, dogmatic, anti-intellectual, anti-science, deceitful, denier "arguments".
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#24145 Mar 6, 2013
Ralph wrote:
More cold weather/proof of Global Warming..
IF man was heating the earth it would NEVER get colder.
NEVER!
Sooo???

You could "ponder" on your own, micey-unnicey!
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#24146 Mar 6, 2013
Capt Crunch wrote:
<quoted text>
.. And, BTW, I notice that most of the raging going on, is from the caterwauling Progressives who fave latched on to this latest bugaboo.
That's your bias.
Kyle

United States

#24147 Mar 6, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you find it curious that Global Warming is attached to bigger governments and higher taxes?
Do you find it curious that GW denial is attached to businesses and individuals profiting from emitting CO2 sans paying the external costs, the non-scientific "think tanks" they openly fund, and the politicians they buy and/or possess an anti-science outlook?

Explain why you believe in a ridiculously implausible global conspiracy that is based upon publication of data, methods, and results and subject to peer review but don't believe in one that is based on open funding of non-scientific critiques of the science by unqualified people and endless repetition of long refuted lies and fallacious arguments. Or not, because you can't. But keep on posting!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
I'm Voting for Trump 3 hr space ace 16
blasted drunk 3 hr space ace 4
America Ferrera Writes "Thank You" Letter to Do... 4 hr American Crassus 9
Be thankful on the 4th f July 4 hr American Crassus 4
South Carolina 4 hr TOASTER 11
As long as we're discussing flags, what about M... 5 hr American Crassus 22
A Very Sad Day 8 hr FOVR 15
More from around the web

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Minneapolis Mortgages