Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say

[litesong]

cras ass wrote:

No one cares about that dead Jigger.

'cras ass' is a slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig, who is too scared to use the 'N' word.

[HomoSapiensLapto picus]

martinezjosei wrote:

<quoted text>
And the Media did NOT edited the tapes, right?
You see? Liberals really believe that they are always the victim!
Was he UNDER drugs? Why were you guys so adamant to hide such info from his autopsy? Because liberalism is based on deception and lies!!!
Did he had tools for stealing car radios? A screwdriver? Why did he had a backpack and a screwdriver?
See? Liberals are brain dead hypocrites easy to fool by the Liberal Media.
If he was a liberal angel, why did your liberal media HAD TO edit the tapes?
See? Liberals are brain dead hypocrites easy to fool.
And you still believe what the media injected into your brain dead head, that he was the poor victim because he was a Liberal and his attacker was a gun armed white Republican.
See? Liberals are brain dead hypocrites easy to fool.

OBVIOUSLY there have been MULTIPLE edits, & we've all heard several of them. You think I'm an id!ot?

The cops said afterward that he was told to NOT follow Trayvon, & yes, it's on tape. Editing wouldn't change that.

Yeah, leave to one of you troglodytes to think that Skittles & a soda is worth shooting someone over.

Don't worry, Zimmerman will go down, one way or another.

[HomoSapiensLapto picus]

Errata:

Next to last paragraph should say "Yeah, leave IT to one of you troglodytes..."

Last sentence should read "...one way or another, in this life or the next."

[SpaceBlues]

I agree.

Did you notice lurkers hate rational posts?

[SpaceBlues]

Kyle wrote:

<quoted text>
Done. To a ridiculously high level of statistical certainty. A dozen yrs ago. Your brainwashing notwithstanding.

True. Well done.

That poster is history as of late. Maybe he's begging his maker for repost.

[litesong]

SpaceBlues wrote:

That poster is history as of late. Maybe he's begging his maker for repost.

Since dirtling,'earthling has no brain','eart hling(alien has no affinity to Earth)','injun killer(has no love for human beings)' is an atheist, arrogant & prideful, it would gladfully dwell with Satan's elite its, altho........ the MERCY OF GOD is much higher than my imagination, so Praise God!

[PHD]

litesong wrote:

<quoted text>
Since dirtling,'earthling has no brain','eart hling(alien has no affinity to Earth)','injun killer(has no love for human beings)' is an atheist, arrogant & prideful, it would gladfully dwell with Satan's elite its, altho........ the MERCY OF GOD is much higher than my imagination, so Praise God!

And you think topix doesn’t know what you publish? Attacks on me won't delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.

[tina anne]

Kyle wrote:

<quoted text>
During the Cambrian, many other things were different. It is absolutely illogical to deny global warming or its seriousness on the grounds that climate has changed before or some such crap. MEANINGLESS. You need to deal with the fact that CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is rising at a rate 100X as fast as at any time in the historical record. Far faster than it can be consumed by weathering of silicates or absorbed into the deep ocean. Facts are facts, deniers. Start living in reality and forget your loony conspiracy theories. AGW was statistically proven beyond any reasonable doubt a dozen years ago.

And how long is the historical record? Compare that to how long the earth has had a climate and you discover that we have only recorded a minor fraction. That research has discovered that the thawing perifrost is releasing CO2 and CH4. Which makes the rising CO2 level an effect and not a cause. Also, you forgot that plants also asorb CO2, and produce O2 in the process.

Yes, facts are facts. The CO2 levels in the Cambrian were higher and the world was lush with life. AGW was disproven in various studies and the reason why you no longer hear about it in the media where it is now called climate change. That many climate scientist have now disproved AGW with other studies.
AGW was actually disproved both scientifically and statistically.

[Amused Slew]

Actually, you were disproved, both scientifically and statistically.

LMAOROTFU~!

As for your "fraction", we're part of the fraction and the life during Cambrian didn't include annoying idiots, like you.

[PHD]

You are trying to argue with the scientific science fiction useless babble bunch. Talk to an empty chair you will get a better answer.

[Brian_G]

Did I ever tell you, Nitrogen isn't my favorite atmospheric gas? What with 350.org and the greens; we can all design our own atmosphere. I favor more CO2 and Oxygen, but less Nitrogen for balance.

Yes, it's transparent to infrared light as much as clear to visible light but that's not good enough. I like CO2 more carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas. If our atmosphere was too clear to IR light, we'd freeze.

Nitrogen makes good fertilizer, but I like O2 and CO2 more.

[Amused Slew]

Brain Gone wrote-"I find Topix is mostly a waste of time."

In your case, a COMPLETE waste of time.

[PHD]

Don't inhale it you may wake up dead.

[Amused Slew]

Personal experience ??

[PHD]

No, have you?

[Amused Slew]

Seems like you're brain dead, so I asked outta concern..... Pretty dumb playing rubber/glue, but YOU are you. LMAOROTFU~!

Ps- Good plan, using small words, they fit your "ability".

[PHD]

It may seem that I'm brain dead but there is no doubt yours is. PS. Get that check up from the neck up you desperately need…

[Amused Slew]

PHD wrote:

It may seem that I'm brain dead but there is no doubt yours is. PS. Get that check up from the neck up you desperately need…

It may seem ....??? UNDERSTATEMENT !!! Sadly, you've used that old blather dozens of times, are you THAT SIMPLE ???

[PHD]

Amused Slew wrote:

<quoted text>It may seem ....??? UNDERSTATEMENT !!! Sadly, you've used that old blather dozens of times, are you THAT SIMPLE ???

Yes simple unlike you a simpleton.

[Amused Slew]

Yes, you are both simple and a simpleton....